Fisheries Management Measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) Management Areas - High level Site Summary Details and Potential Impacts of Proposed Fisheries Management Measures
Overview of site and area details and potential impacts of the proposed fisheries management measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) management areas
21. Shetland Isles Scottish Marine Region Proposed PMF Management Areas
Due to the complexity and large number of areas, the estimated socio-economic impacts of proposed measures data has been produced at a regional level, allowing for a more consistent assessment across wider geographical scales while still capturing key variations in ecological, social, and economic value. Some values may not be disclosed for confidentiality reasons, as it relates to the operations of fewer than three vessels. Sites with a proposed single management option will be option 2.
|
Socio-Economic Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Average annual loss in value of landings (£000s, 2022 prices) |
0 - 7.5 |
0 - 7.5 |
|
Direct + indirect reduction in GVA (PV) impact (£000s) 20 years |
0 - 55.9 |
0 - 55.9 |
|
Average (mean) number of direct + indirect jobs (year on year, over 20 years), Full Time Equivalents |
0 - 0.1 |
0 - 0.1 |
|
Environmental Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Benefits within the sites/areas |
Major beneficial |
Major beneficial |
|
Spill over benefits |
Negligible beneficial |
Negligible beneficial |
|
Displacement effects |
Negligible adverse |
Negligible adverse |
|
Effects from other gear types |
Minor adverse |
Negligible adverse |
|
Estimated overall environmental impact |
Benefit |
Benefit |
21.1. Single Proposed Management Option
PMF management areas will be closed to demersal trawls and seines, beam trawls, mechanical dredges, and hydraulic dredges. This is because the features present in these areas are sensitive to these gear types.
A single management option has been developed for the following 9 PMF management areas. Only one option was identified due to one of, or combination of, evidence (fishing activity or PMF related), boundary setting principles and compliance considerations.
21.1.1. Area: Back of Ollaberry, Yell Sound (Shetland)
This was developed to include known horse mussel bed records and to accommodate additional fishing data provided.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
Figure 184. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.2. Area: Lunna Ness, North (Shetland)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Yell Sound Coast SAC and East Mainland Coast, Shetland SPA.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for East Mainland Coast SPA for set nets (including fyke nets) and Yell Sound Coast SAC for set nets (including fyke nets) and pelagic seine (including ring-nets) which are not shown in the map below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static and pelagic gear measures.
This was developed to encompass known records and the depth preferences of maerl in Shetland and to accommodate additional fishing data provided.
Feature: Maerl beds
There are also maerl or coarse shell gravel with burrowing sea cucumber records present, but they were not a qualifying feature for area selection.
Figure 185. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.3. Area: Linga Sound (Shetland)
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area.
The boundary was drawn around the majority of known horse mussel bed records at the time of the areas were being finalised for consultation. We are aware there are additional horse mussel bed records to the south of the area that were part of North Atlantic Fisheries College (NAFC) Marine Centre University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Shetland survey in 2019 but were not in Geodatabase of Marine features adjacent to Scotland (GeMS) when areas were developed.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
Figure 186. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.4. Area: Lunning Sound (Shetland)
The boundary was drawn around known maerl bed records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area. The boundary matches the existing SSMO closure.
Feature: Maerl beds and maerl or coarse shell gravel with burrowing sea cucumbers
Figure 187. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.5. Area: Papa, North (Shetland)
The boundary was drawn around known maerl bed records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area.
Feature: Maerl beds
Figure 188. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.6. Area: Quey Firth (Shetland)
The boundary was drawn around known horse mussel bed records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area. The area overlaps with an existing SSMO closure.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
Figure 189. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.7. Area: Whalsay, South-West (Shetland)
The boundary was drawn around known horse mussel bed records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
Figure 190. Map of measures proposed:
21.1.8. Area: West Mainland Voes, Shetland
West Mainland Voes (Shetland) proposed PMF management area covers three distinct areas: the waters of Sandsound and Whiteness Voes, as well as an area to the southeast of Fore Holm.
This covers three discrete locations with some overlaps with current SSMO closures. Amendments were made based on stakeholder feedback and NatureScot advice from what was a bigger area in 2018. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed management area.
We are aware there are additional horse mussel records outside the area by the Fore Holm area but these were not in GeMS when the areas were drawn. There are also the three horse mussel bed records at Stromness Voe but these are older records (1986, 1987 and 1974) and were not included.
Feature: Horse mussel beds, blue mussel beds and seagrass beds
There are also intertidal blue mussel records present but they were not considered as part of this process due to there being no overlaps with bottom-contacting fisheries and intertidal mussel beds.
Figure 191. Map of measures proposed:*
*There are blue mussel bed records obscured by the cluster of seagrass bed records in Whiteness Voe
21.1.9. Area: West Voe, East Burra (Shetland)
This area incorporates two SSMO closures which cover the seagrass bed records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area.
Feature: Seagrass beds
Figure 192. Map of measures proposed:
21.2. Two Proposed management options
PMF management areas will be closed to demersal trawls and seines, beam trawls, mechanical dredges, and hydraulic dredges. This is because the features present in these areas are sensitive to these gear types.
Two options have been developed for the following 2 PMF management areas. Option 1 reflects a smaller footprint that reflects one, or a combination of evidence (fishing activity or PMF related), boundary setting principles and compliance considerations. Option 2 covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
21.2.1. Area: Busta Voe (Shetland)
There are records included in Option 2 that are not included in Option 1 due to the age of the records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management area.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
Option 1: Developed around records with newer dates. Is larger than, but includes, SSMO closures.
Figure 193. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection and includes older records.
Figure 194. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
21.2.2. Area: Wadbister Voe (Shetland)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the East Mainland Coast, Shetland SPA.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for East Mainland Coast SPA for set nets (including fyke nets) which are not shown in the maps below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear measures.
Feature: Maerl beds
There is a maerl bed record included in Option 2 but not included in Option 1 as it is an older record from 1986. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Option 1: Developed around more recent records, incorporates the SSMO closure, extending slightly to the south-east.
Figure 195. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection and includes an older record.
Figure 196. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
Contact
Email: marine_biodiversity@gov.scot