Fisheries Management Measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) Management Areas - High level Site Summary Details and Potential Impacts of Proposed Fisheries Management Measures
Overview of site and area details and potential impacts of the proposed fisheries management measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) management areas
9. Clyde Scottish Marine Region MPAs
Due to the complexity and large number of areas and sites, ecosystem services data has been produced at a regional level, allowing for a more consistent assessment across wider geographical scales while still capturing key variations in ecological, social, and economic value.
|
Total value of changes in ecosystem services |
Option 1 Min |
Option 1 Max |
Option 2 Min |
Option 2 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Benefits |
Low |
Low |
Low - Moderate |
Low - Moderate |
|
Costs |
Minimal - Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
|
Net Impacts |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Small benefit |
Small benefit |
9.1. Site: Clyde Sea Sill NCMPA
Protected features:
- Black guillemot
- Circalittoral and offshore sand and coarse sediment communities
- Fronts
- Marine Geomorphology of the Scottish Shelf Seabed
Fronts and Marine Geomorphology of the Scottish Shelf Seabed are not discussed further as they are not a protected feature for which fisheries management measures are required.
Feature conditions:
- Black guillemot - Unfavourable
- Circalittoral and offshore sand and coarse sediment communities - Favourable
Conservation objectives:
- Black guillemot - Recover
- Circalittoral and offshore sand and coarse sediment communities - Conserve
The proposed management measures for Clyde Sea Sill NCMPA are as follows.
Option 1:
- Full site closure to beam trawls, set nets (includes fyke nets) and hydraulic dredge
- Mechanical dredges prohibited in part of the site
Figure 28. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2:
- Full site closure to beam trawls, set nets (includes fyke nets), hydraulic dredge and mechanical dredge.
Figure 29. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
|
Socio-Economic Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Average annual loss in value of landings (£000s, 2022 prices) |
0 - 69.6 |
306 – 306 |
|
Direct + indirect reduction in GVA (PV) impact (£000s) 20 years |
0 - 515.2 |
2,269.8 - 2,269.8 |
|
Average (mean) number of direct + indirect jobs (year on year, over 20 years), Full Time Equivalents |
0 - 0.8 |
3.5 - 3.5 |
|
Environmental Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Benefits within the sites/areas |
Major beneficial |
Major beneficial |
|
Spill over benefits |
Negligible beneficial |
Negligible beneficial |
|
Displacement effects |
Negligible adverse |
Negligible adverse |
|
Effects from other gear types |
None |
None |
|
Estimated overall environmental impact |
Benefit |
Benefit |
9.2. Site: Ailsa Craig SPA
Protected features:
- Gannet - breeding
- Guillemot - breeding
- Herring Gull - breeding
- Kittiwake - breeding
- Lesser black-backed gull - breeding
Feature conditions:
- Gannet - Favourable
- Guillemot - Favourable
- Herring Gull - Unfavourable
- Kittiwake - Unfavourable
- Lesser black-backed gull - Unfavourable
Conservation objectives:
- Gannet - Maintain
- Guillemot - Maintain
- Herring Gull - Restore
- Kittiwake - Restore
- Lesser black-backed gull - Restore
The proposed management measures for Ailsa Craig SPA are as follows.
Option 1:
- Set nets (including fyke nets) prohibited from February till end of September in areas shallower than 34m based on presence and maximum dive depth for gannet.
- Demersal set nets (including fyke nets) prohibited from February until the end of August in areas deeper than 34m but shallower than 177m, based on presence and maximum dive depth of guillemot, and pelagic set nets prohibited February till end of September, in the same area based on presence of gannet.
- Full site closure to longlines (until technical measures come into force) and hydraulic dredge.
Figure 30. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2:
- Full site closure to longlines (until technical measures come into force), set nets (including fyke nets) and hydraulic dredge
Figure 31. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
Estimated Socio-economic impacts of proposed measures for Ailsa Craig SPA
No socio-economic impacts are anticipated for this site, based on available data in relation to:
- Average annual loss in value of landings (£000s, 2022 prices)
- Direct + indirect reduction in GVA (PV) impact (£000s) 20 years
- Average (mean) number of direct + indirect jobs (year on year, over 20 years), Full Time Equivalents
|
Environmental Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Benefits within the sites/areas |
Moderate beneficial |
Moderate beneficial |
|
Spill over benefits |
None |
None |
|
Displacement effects |
None |
None |
|
Effects from other gear types |
None |
None |
|
Estimated overall environmental impact |
Benefit |
Benefit |
Contact
Email: marine_biodiversity@gov.scot