Fisheries Management Measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) Management Areas - High level Site Summary Details and Potential Impacts of Proposed Fisheries Management Measures
Overview of site and area details and potential impacts of the proposed fisheries management measures within Scottish Inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) management areas
17. Orkney Islands Scottish Marine Region Proposed PMF Management Areas
Due to the complexity and large number of areas, the estimated socio-economic impacts of proposed measures data has been produced at a regional level, allowing for a more consistent assessment across wider geographical scales while still capturing key variations in ecological, social, and economic value. Some values may not be disclosed for confidentiality reasons, as it relates to the operations of fewer than three vessels. Sites with a proposed single management option will be option 2.
|
Socio-Economic Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Average annual loss in value of landings (£000s, 2022 prices) |
4.2 - 13.3 |
7.1 - 24.6 |
|
Direct + indirect reduction in GVA (PV) impact (£000s) 20 years |
31.1 - 97.1 |
53.3 - 183 |
|
Average (mean) number of direct + indirect jobs (year on year, over 20 years), Full Time Equivalents |
0 - 0.2 |
0.1 - 0.3 |
|
Environmental Impact |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Benefits within the sites/areas |
Major beneficial |
Major beneficial |
|
Spill over benefits |
Negligible beneficial |
Negligible beneficial |
|
Displacement effects |
Negligible adverse |
Negligible adverse |
|
Effects from other gear types |
Negligible adverse |
Negligible adverse |
|
Estimated overall environmental impact |
Benefit |
Benefit |
17.1. Single Proposed Management Option
PMF management areas will be closed to demersal trawls and seines, beam trawls, mechanical dredges, and hydraulic dredges. This is because the features present in these areas are sensitive to these gear types.
A single management option has been developed for the following 2 PMF management areas. Only one option was identified due to one of, or combination of, evidence (fishing activity or PMF related), boundary setting principles and compliance considerations.
17.1.1. Area: Bay of Tuquoy, Westray (Orkney)
Management measures reflects the distribution of the PMF records. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed management area.
Feature: Seagrass beds
Figure 92. Map of measures proposed:
17.1.2. Area: Bay of Swartmill (Orkney)
This option includes the known PMF records and the whole bay has been included as the area is of suitable depth for maerl beds in Orkney. No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed management area.
Feature: Maerl beds
Figure 93. Map of measures proposed:
17.2. Two Proposed management options
PMF management areas will be closed to demersal trawls and seines, beam trawls, mechanical dredges, and hydraulic dredges. This is because the features present in these areas are sensitive to these gear types.
Two options have been developed for the following 7 PMF management areas. Option 1 reflects a smaller footprint that reflects one, or a combination of evidence (fishing activity or PMF related), boundary setting principles and compliance considerations. Option 2 covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
17.2.1. Area: Copinsay (Orkney)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Copinsay SPA.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for Copinsay SPA for set nets (including fyke nets) and longlines (until technical measures come into force) which are not shown in the maps below.
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear and longline measures.
Additional observations of horse mussel beds that lie outside the option 1 area, and one beyond the option 2 area. This was from a 2024 NatureScot-Marine Directorate survey where data were only available after the area was finalised for consultation.
Feature: Horse mussel beds
There are also fan mussel aggregation records present in option 2, but they were not a qualifying feature for area selection.
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint around most of the cluster of horse mussel bed records.
Figure 94. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
Figure 95. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.2. Area: Hoy Sound (East) to South Walls (Orkney)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Hoy and Scapa Flow SPAs.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for Hoy and Scapa Flow SPAs for set nets (including fyke nets) and overlapping area with Hoy SPA for longlines (until technical measures come into force) which are not shown in the maps below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear and longline measures.
Option 1 originally covered our knowledge of the records but new records of horse mussel records to the north and maerl bed records to the southeast of the area have been confirmed since the options were developed. The boundary developed for Option 2 was already large enough to include the horse mussel bed records. The maerl bed records to southeast of the area fall outside the developed options as they were available in GeMS after the proposed areas were finalised for consultation.
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Feature: Flame shell beds, horse mussel beds, maerl beds, fan mussel aggregations and seagrass beds
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint over two discrete locations.
Figure 96. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger single area and extends to the north.
Figure 97. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.3. Area: Hoy Sound (Orkney)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Hoy and Scapa Flow SPAs.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for Hoy and Scapa Flow SPAs for set nets (including fyke nets) and overlapping area with Hoy SPA for longlines (until technical measures come into force) which are not shown in the maps below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear and longline measures.
Option 2 also has an additional maerl bed record not captured in Option 1 as the data were not available when the options were finalised for consultation. No additional fishing data provided within the proposed management areas.
Feature: Maerl beds, seagrass beds
There are also maerl or coarse shell gravel with burrowing sea cucumbers records present in Option 2, but they were not the focus for this area’s selection.
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint encompassing known maerl bed and seagrass bed records at the time.
Figure 98. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint extending to the south to include additional maerl bed records and maerl or coarse shell gravel and burrowing sea cucumbers records.
Figure 99. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.4. Area: Eday, Sanday, and Stronsay (Orkney)
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Feature: Horse mussel beds maerl beds, seagrass beds,
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint more closely reflecting the distribution of the PMFs.
Figure 100. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
Figure 101. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.5. Area: Orkney Sounds and Firths (South)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Rousay and North Orkney SPAs.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for Rousay and North Orkney SPAs for set nets (including fyke nets) and overlapping area with Rousay SPA for longlines (until technical measures come into force) which are not shown in the maps below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear and longline measures.
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Feature: Horse mussel beds, maerl beds and seagrass beds
There is also a fan mussel species record present in the options, but this feature was not a focus for this area’s selection.
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint and includes clusters of known PMF records within two discrete locations.
Figure 102. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
Figure 103. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.6. Area: Papa Westray, South (Orkney)
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
The sloping northern boundary at Knap of Hower and the southeastern boundary at Sheepheight were drawn to follow the boundary of the Papa Westray MPA.
Feature: Maerl beds, seagrass beds
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint, more closely following the 10 m depth contour in the south.
Figure 104. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
Figure 105. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
17.2.7. Area: Widewall Bay (Orkney)
This proposed PMF management area overlaps with the Scapa Flow SPA.
This PMF management area overlaps with management measures being consulted on for Scapa Flow SPA for set nets (including fyke nets) which are not shown in the maps below.
Please check overlapping site map option(s) to see static gear measures.
No additional fishing data were provided within the proposed PMF management areas.
Feature: Seagrass beds
Option 1: This boundary covers a smaller footprint that includes known seagrass bed records.
Figure 106. Map of measures proposed under option 1:
Option 2: This boundary covers a larger footprint that offers improved protection.
Figure 107. Map of measures proposed under option 2:
Contact
Email: marine_biodiversity@gov.scot