Land acquisition powers and land ownership restrictions in European countries: evidence review

The research looks at how countries have changed their land ownership laws and the extent to which that complies with the right to property included in the European Convention on Human Rights.


1. Ahlinder, E. (2018). Fair Compensation for Telecom Rights in Land in Sweden and the UK. European Property Law Journal, 7(1).

2. Auckland, C., & Goold, I. (2020). Re-Evaluating ‘Best Interests’ in the Wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors. Modern Law Review, 83(6).

3. Azzena, L. I. M. (2020). Dialogue between Courts about the right to property. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos, 120.

4. Варава, К. І. (2020). Problematic Issues of Protecting Property Rights from Illegal Actions of Public Authorities. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 90(3).

5. Beloff, M., & Brown, P. (1999). Planning contravention notices and the right to silence: The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998. Journal of Planning and Environment Law, DEC.

6. Bennion, T. et al. (2017) New Zealand land law / Elizabeth Toomey, general editor; John Burrows QC, consulting editor; Tom Bennion [and seven others]. 3rd edition. Wellington [New Zealand: Thomson Reuters.

7. Bindi, E. (2016). Proportionality test in the “age of balancing.” Revista de Derecho Politico, 96.

8. Borowiecki, K.J. (2012) Dynamics of a protected housing market: The case of Switzerland. Urban Studies, 49(14): 3195-3210.

9. Butterwick, M., & Rolfe, E.n. (1965). Structural Reform in French Agriculture the Work of the SAFERs. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16 (4), 548–554.

10. Coruhlu, Y. E., Uzun, B., & Yildiz, O. (2020). Zoning plan-based legal confiscation without expropriation in Turkey in light of ECHR decisions. Land Use Policy, 95.

11. De Witt, Siefried, Corinna Durinke and Maria Geismann, (2015) “Expropriation Law in Germany” in Sluysmans, Verbist, S., & Waring, E. Expropriation law in Europe / edited by Jacques Sluysmans, Stijn Verbist and Emma Waring. Wolters Kluwer.

12. DLA Piper, 2017, Bob Martens, The Flemish Expropriation Decree: Ready for take-off?

13. Dosch, Jörn, and Malvina Lakatos. “South Tyrol and Åland: Collective Identity in the Interplay of Old and New Minorities.” Studies in ethnicity and nationalism 20.2 (2020): 188–207.

14. Duranthon, A. (2020). Thomas Perroud, Jacques Caillosse, Jacques Chevallier et Danièle Lochak (dir.), Paris: LGDJ, coll. «Les grandes décisions», 2020, 567 p. Revue Française d’administration Publique, N°176(4).

15. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Impact on Polish Law Development. (2021). Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(1).

16. ECHR Case Profile for Bulgaria

17. Engel Voelkers, (2021). Legal guide to Lex Koller.

18. Gerards, J. (2020a). Abstract and Concrete Reasonableness Review by the European Court of Human Rights. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, 1(2).

19. Gerards, J. (2020b). The age of balancing revisited? In European Data Protection Law Review (Vol. 6, Issue 1).

20. Glass, J., Bryce, R., Combe, M., Hutchison, N.E., Price, M.F., Schulz, L. and Valero, D. (2018). Research on interventions to manage land markets and limit the concentration of land ownership elsewhere in the world. Scottish Land Commission, Commissioned Report.

21. Glen Searle (ed.). (2018). Compulsory property acquisition for urban densification. Routledge.

22. Glenn, S., MacKessack-Leitch, J., Pollard, K., Glass, J., and McMorran, R., (2019), Investigation into the Issues Associated with Large scale and Concentrated Landownership in Scotland, Scottish Land Commission.

23. Gordon, A. (2012). Public Interest in UK Courts. ESRC End of Award Report.

24. Greer, S., Gerards, J., & Slowe, R. (2018). The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. In Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union.

25. Gugushvili, A. (2016) ‘Money Can’t Buy Me Land’: Foreign Land Ownership Regime and Public Opinion in a Transition Society.” Land use policy 55: 142–153.

26. Hepburn, E. Forging autonomy in a unitary state: The Åland Islands in Finland. Comp Eur Polit 12, 468–487 (2014).

27. Hilber, C. and O. Schöni. (2016). Housing policies in Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States, in Yoshino, Naoyuki and Helble, Matthias, (eds.) The Housing Challenge in Emerging Asia: Options and Solutions. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Development Bank Institute pp. 210-259.

28. Hindle, R., Thomson, S., Skerratt, S., McMorran, R. & Onea, P. 20 14. Economic Contribution of Estates in Scotland: An Economic Assessment for Scottish Land & Estates. Final report.

29. Holtslag-Broekhof, S. (2018). Urban land readjustment: Necessary for effective urban renewal? Analysing the Dutch quest for new legislation. Land Use Policy, 77.

30. Holtslag-Broekhof, S., Beunen, R., Marwijk, R. van, & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2018). Exploring the valuation of compulsory purchase compensation. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(2).

31. Holtslag-Broekhof, S. M., van Marwijk, R., Beunen, R., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2016). Perceived (In)justice of Public Land Acquisition. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2).

32. Iosifidis, P., & Katsirea, I. (2014). Public Service Broadcasting in Greece in the Era of Austerity. SSRN Electronic Journal.

33. Jackson, P., & Wilde, D. C. (n.d.). The Reform of Property Law.

34. Jacobs, M. (2015) Law of Compulsory Land Acquisition, Thomson Reuters.

35. Jepsen, M.R. et al. (2015) Transitions in European Land-Management Regimes Between 1800 and 2010. Land use policy 49.SI. pp. 53–64.

36. Joenniemi, Pertti. “The Åland Islands: Neither Local nor Fully Sovereign.” Cooperation and conflict 49.1 (2014): 80–97.

37. Jones, G., & Pike, J. (2002). Proportionality and planning - A difficult and nice point to be decided. Journal of Planning and Environment Law, Aug, 908–922.

38. Karlsson, A. (2009) ‘Sub-National Island Jurisdictions as Configurations of Jurisdictional Powers and Economic Capacity: Nordic Experiences from Åland, Faroes and Greenland’, Island Studies Journal 4(2): 139-162.

39. Kim, I., Lee, H., & Somin, I. (2017). Eminent Domain [Book]. Cambridge University Press.

40. Kirkwood, P. (2020). Marina v Romania: Balance between privacy and the public interest in the publication of private information. European Data Protection Law Review, 6(4).

41. Kirsten, J. & Sihlobo, W. 2021. “How a land reform agency could break South Africa’s land redistribution deadlock”, The Conversation.

42. Kovalenko, Т. (2019). The Right to the Land (Pay) in the Land Rights System in Ukraine. Social Law, 1.

43. Kotaka, T. & Callies, D. L. (2002) Taking Land: Compulsory Purchase and Regulation in Asian-Pacific Countries. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

44. Lawley, C. (2018) Ownership Restrictions and Farmland Values: Evidence from the 2003 Saskatchewan Farm Security Act Amendment. American journal of agricultural economics 100.1. pp. 311–337.

45. Legislative proposals for addressing concentrated landownership - 601acfc4ea58a_Legislative proposals to address the impact of Scotland’s concentration of land ownership - Discussion Paper Feb 2021. (n.d.-b).

46. Loveland, I. (2001). The compatibility of the land use planning system with article 6 of the European convention on human rights. Journal of Planning and Environment Law, MAY.

47. Mateeva, Ekaterina, (2015) “Expropriation Law in Bulgaria” in Sluysmans, Verbist, S., & Waring, E. Expropriation law in Europe / edited by Jacques Sluysmans, Stijn Verbist and Emma Waring. Wolters Kluwer.

48. Melstrom, R. T. (2021) “The Effect of Land Use Restrictions Protecting Endangered Species on Agricultural Land Values.” American journal of agricultural economics 103.1: 162–184.

49. Moratinos, G. L., & Castillo Parrilla, J. A. (2020). Algorithmic valoration before human rights and the European Convention on Human Rights and the General Data Protection Regulation: The SyRI case. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnologia, 9(1).

50. Mullen, T., Murdoch, J., Miller, A., & Craig, S. (2005). Human rights in the Scottish courts. Journal of Law and Society, 32(1).

51. Munhoz, L. (2014) The Environmental Limitations to Property Rights in Brazil and the United States of America (LLM thesis, Pace University School of Law).

52. Nanhthavong, V., Oberlack, C., Hett, C., Messerli, P., & Epprecht, M. (2021). Pathways to human well-being in the context of land acquisitions in Lao PDR. Global Environmental Change, 68.

53. Notess, L., Veit, P., Monterroso, I., Andiko, Sulle, E., Larson, A. M., Gindroz, A. S., Quaedvlieg, J., & Williams, A. (2021). Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries. Land Use Policy, 110.

54. OECD 2021, Decentralisation and Regionalisation in Bulgaria: Towards Balanced Regional Development

55. Orebech, P. T. (2009). From diplomatic - To human rights protection: The possessions under the 1950 European human rights convention, first additional protocol article 1. Journal of World Trade, 43(1).

56. Öst, Heidi. “The Concept of the Åland Islands’ Regional Citizenship and Its Impact on the Inclusion of Migrants.” European yearbook of minority issues 13.1 (2016): 220–232.

57. Palmstorfer, N. (2017). Austrian Constitutional Court: Vegan Landowner Must Tolerate Hunting on his Property. ICL Journal, 11(1).

58. Parker, G., & Amati, M. (2009). Institutional setting, politics and planning: Private property, public interest and land reform in Japan. International Planning Studies, 14(2), 141–160.

59. Paul, B. (n.d.). Statutory Land Exchanges that Reflect “Appropriate” Value and “Well Serve” the Public Interest.

60. Pestalozzi Law. (2021) New attempt to tighten rules on foreign real property investments fails in Parliament, 26th March 2021.

61. Pestalozzi Law. (2018) “Federal government drops plan to tighten rules on foreign real property investments”, 29th June 2018.

62. Piet, L., Latruffe, L., Le Mouël, C., & Desjeux, Y. (2012). How do agricultural policies influence farm size inequality? The example of France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 5–28.

63. Ralli, T. & Weckström, K. (2015) Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union, National Report Finland.

64. Ramesh, J. (2015). Legislating for justice: the making of the 2013 Land Acquisition Law (M. A. Khan, Ed.; First edition.) [Book]. Oxford University Press.

65. Reynolds, S. (2010). Before Eminent Domain [Book]. The University of North Carolina Press.

66. Saccucci, A. (2021). Accesso ai rimedi costituzionali, previo esaurimento e gestione “sussidiaria” delle violazioni strutturali della CEDU derivanti da difetti legislativi. Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, 2.

67. SAFER Report 2018. “50 Actions des Safers dans nos regions.”

68. Sanglier, M. et al. (2017). Policies and instruments of land market regulations: The SAFER, French land agencies. Terre de Liens.

69. Sayın, Y. et al. (2017) Land Law and Limits on the Right to Property: Historical, Comparative and International Analysis. European Property Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017, pp. 4-52.

70. Searle, G. (2021) Compulsory property acquisition for urban densification, Routledge.

71. Shields, K. (2015). Tackling the Misuse of Rights Rhetoric in Land Reform Debate. Greens Scottish Human Rights Journal, 1(68), 1–4. Open access at

72. Simolin, S. (2018) “The Aims of Åland and Finland Regarding a New Act on the Autonomy of Åland.” Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies 2.1.

73. Slidders, C. (2020) Janneke Gerards: General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights. In European Yearbook on Human Rights 2019.

74. Sluysmans, J. et al. (eds.), (2015). Expropriation law in Europe. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.

75. Sluysmans, J.A.M.A. and Regien de Graaff, (2015) Expropriation Law in the Netherlands, in Sluysmans, J. et al. (eds.), (2015). Expropriation law in Europe. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.

76. Smits, J. M. (Jan M., & Edward Elgar Publishing. (n.d.). Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law.

77. Stricker, Luzius. (2022). Restricting the Construction of Second Homes in Tourist Destinations: An Effective Intervention Towards Sustainability? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 158.1, 1–16.

78. Sztranyiczki, S. (2019). A Few Considerations with Regard to the Case-Law of the ECHR in Connection to the Enforcement of Final Judgements in the Matter of Land Resources. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies, 8(1).

79. Tang, D., Liu, H., Song, E., & Chang, S. (2020). Urban expansion simulation from the perspective of land acquisition-based on bargaining model and ant colony optimization. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 82.

80. Teodoru. G. (2022). Restrictions on the sale of agricultural land. Controversies National Law – Union Law (sic). Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 11(1), 142–156.

81. The Guardian, 29 Sept 2021, “Berlin’s vote to take properties from big landlords could be a watershed moment”.

82. The Guardian, 9 Sept 2021. “Netherlands proposes radical plans to cut livestock numbers by almost a third.”

83. The public interest test in FOISA Briefing. (n.d.).

84. Trykhlib, K. (2020). The Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of the Human Rights. EU 2020 – Lessons from the Past and Solutions for the Future, 4.

85. van Aaken, A. (2017). Direct expropriation: Multi-layered legal protection in Europe. In Eminent Domain: A Comparative Perspective.

86. van der Schyff, G. (2013). Interpreting the protection guaranteed by two-stage rights in the European Convention on Human Rights. In Shaping rights in the ECHR.

87. van Erp, S. (2006). Comparative Property Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford University Press.

88. Verbist, Stijn, (2015) “Expropriation Law in Belgium” in Sluysmans, J. et al. (eds.), (2015). Expropriation law in Europe. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.

89. Viesturs, J. et al. (2017) Arguments Used for Restricting International Real Property Transactions: Case Study of Latvia. Baltic journal of real estate economics and construction management 5.1: 62–75.

90. von Thomas Buomberger. (2018). “Überfremdung”: History of a Swiss term. Blogpost (in German).

91. Wightman, A. 2013. The Poor had no Lawyers: Who owns Scotland and how they got it. Birlinn, Edinburgh. 448 pp.

92. Xhafaj, J. (2017). The impact of public interest in the information privacy: Analyze of the ECHR Decisions.

93. Xu, T. (2019). A law-and-community approach to compensation for takings of property under the European Convention on Human Rights. In Legal Studies (Vol. 39, Issue 3).



Back to top