Publication - Research and analysis

Public Acceptability of Data Sharing Between the Public, Private and Third Sectors for Research Purposes

Published: 4 Oct 2013
Part of:

Report of a deliberative research project on the public's attitudes towards data sharing. It focuses particularly on a) the public's opinion about data sharing with the private and third sector; b) the acceptability of different methods for sharing benefits gained from the use of their data; and c) the appeal of different methods for empowering citizens in decision making about the use of their data.

130 page PDF

1.6 MB

130 page PDF

1.6 MB

Public Acceptability of Data Sharing Between the Public, Private and Third Sectors for Research Purposes

130 page PDF

1.6 MB


Administrative Data Taskforce (2012) The UK Administrative Data Research Network: Improving Access for Research and Policy [Online] Available from:

Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C., 1999, 'Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation' World Development 27(4): 629-649

Aitken, M., 2011, 'Linking social care, housing and health data: Social care clients' and patients' views' Scottish Government Social Research

Al Qadire, M., Hammami, M., 2010, 'Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples' BMC Medical Ethics 11(18)

Armstrong, V., Barnett, J., Cooper, H., Monkman, M., Moran-Ellis, J. & Shepherd, R., 2007, Public Attitudes to Governance: A qualitative study in a deliberative context London: The Wellcome Trust

Arnason G (2007) Icelandic Biobank. A Report for GenBenefit [Online] Available from :

Arnstein, S. R., 1969, 'A Ladder of Citizen Participation' Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216-224

Asai, A., Ohnishi, M., Nishigaki, E., Sekimoto, M., Fukuhara, S. and Fukui, T., 2002, 'Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews' BMC Medical Ethics 3

Barr C, Resosudarmo I, Dermawan A, and McCarthy J (2006) with Moeliono M and Setiono B, (eds.). Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods. Bogor, Indonesia.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

Barr et al (2009) Rethinking Forest Partnerships and Benefit-sharing: Insights on Factors and Context that make Collaborative Arrangements Work for Communities and Landowners. World Bank Agricultural and Rural Development Department Report No. 51575-GLB

Barrett, G., Cassell, J.A., Peacock, J.L., Coleman, M.P., 2006, 'National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry' BMJ 332: 1068-72

Baslar K (1998) The Concept of The Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law. Netherlands, Klewer Law International

Bombard, Y., Abelson, J., Simeonov, D., & Gauvin, F., 2011, 'Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach' Social Science & Medicine 73: 135-144

Bhopal, R., Fischbacher, C., Povey, C., Chalmers, J., Mueller, G., Steiner, M., Brown, H., Brewster, D.H. and Bansal, N. (2011), 'Cohort Profile: Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study of 4.65 million people exploring ethnic variations in disease in Scotland'. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40 (5): 1168-1175

Brown, K., 2003a, 'Three challenges for a real people-centred conservation' Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 89-92

Buckley, B.S., Murphy, A.W. & MacFarlane, A.E., 2011, 'Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public' Journal of Medical Ethics: 50-55

Chadwick R and Berg K (2001) Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetic. [Online] 2, 318-321. Available from: doi:10.1038/35066094

Chilvers, J., 2010, Sustainable participation? Mapping out and reflecting on the field of public dialogue on science and technology Sciencewise Expert Resource Centre

COI, 2009, Effective Public Engagement: A guide for policy-makers and communications professionals

Coleman, S. & Gotze, J., 2010, Bowling Together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation

Cooke, B. & Kothari, U., 2001, 'The Case for Participation as Tyranny' 1-15 in B. Cooke & U. Kothari eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books: London, New York

Cousins G., McGee H., Ring L., Conroy R., Kay E., Croke D., 2005, Public perceptions of biomedical research: A survey of the general population in Ireland Dublin: Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Damschroder, L.J., Pritts, J.L., Neblo, M.A., Kalarickal, R.J., Creswell, J.W. & Hayward, R.A., 2007, 'Patients, privacy and trust: Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records' Social Science and Medicine 64: 223-235

Davidson, S., McLean, C., Cunningham-Burley, S. & Pagliari, C., 2012, Public Acceptability of Cross-Sectoral Data Linkage Scottish Government Social Research

Department of Health (2013), Information: To share or not to share? The Information Governance Review [Online] Available from:

De Vries R, Stanczyk A, Wall IF, Uhlmann R, Damschroder LJ & Kim SY, 2010, 'Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research' Social Science and Medicine 70: 1896-1903

De Vries, R., Stanczyk, A. E., Ryan, K. A., & Kim, S. Y., 2011, 'A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics' Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6(3): 3

Dialogue by Design, 2008, Dialogue by Design: A handbook of public and stakeholder engagement (Version 2)

Etchegary, H., Green, J., Dicks, E., Pullman, D., Street, C., & Parfrey, P., 2013, 'Consulting the community: public expectations and attitudes about genetics research' European Journal of Human Genetics

Fife Council, An Introduction to Consultation Methods

Generation Scotland (2013), Access to Generation Scotland Resources [Online] Available from:

Goddard B et al (2004) Strategies for Consulting with the Community: The case of four large-scale genetic databases, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10: 457-477

Goss, S., 1999, Managing Working with the Public Kogan Page Ltd

Greeley H (2000) Iceland's plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40 (2): 153-191

Gregory, J. & Miller, S., 1998, Science in Public: Communication, culture and credibility Perseus Publishing: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Haddow G, Laurie G, Cunningham-Burley S and Hunter K (2007) Tackling community concerns about commercialisation and genetic research: A modest interdisciplinary proposal. Social Science & Medicine 64: 272-282

Haddow G, Cunningham-Burley S, Bruce A and Parry S (2008) Generation Scotland: consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic database's development. Critical Public Health. [Online] 18 (2), 139-149. Available from:

Haddow, G., Bruce, A., Sathanandam, S. & Wyatt, J.C., 2011, 'Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes' Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17(6): 1140-6

Halverson, C. M., & Ross, L. F., 2012, 'Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results' Journal of community genetics 3(4): 275-283 Hayden C (2007) Taking as Giving: Bioscience, Exchange, and the Politics of Benefit-sharing. Social Studies of Science 37 (5), 729-758

Holmes, T. & Scoones, I., 2000, Participatory Environmental Policy Processes: experiences from North and South Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper 113, University of Sussex

House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, 2000, Science and Society (Third Report) available at

Human Genome Regulation Act Estonia 2001

Hunter K (2011) The Governance of Biobanks: Benefit-Sharing or Power Sharing? Doctoral Thesis, University of Edinburgh

IAP2, 2007, Spectrum of Public Participation

INVOLVE, 2005, People and Participation: How to put citizens at the heart of decision-making

INVOLVE, 2004, Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing notes for researchers

Irwin, A., 2006, 'The Politics of Talk: Coming to terms with 'new' scientific governance' Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320

Jasanoff, S., 2005, Designs on Nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford

Jefferson, A. L., Lambe, S., Chaisson, C., Palmisano, J., Horvath, K. J., & Karlawish, J., 2011, 'Clinical research participation among aging adults enrolled in an Alzheimer's Disease Centre research registry' Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 23(3): 443-452.

Kadri S (2005) Benefit-sharing: an inquiry regarding the meaning and limits of the concept in human genetic research. Genomics, Society and Policy, 1 (2)

Kadri S (2007) Benefit-sharing Frameworks - Justifications for and against benefit-sharing in human genetic research. A Report for GenBenefit

Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. L., 2009, 'Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research' American journal of human genetics 85(5): 643

Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., Amos, A., 1998, 'The New Genetics and Health: mobilizing lay expertise' Public Understanding of Science 7: 41-60

Kettis-Lindblad, Å., Ring, L., Viberth, E., & Hansson, M. G., 2007, 'Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study' Scandinavian journal of public health 35(2): 148-156

Kim, S. Y. H., Kim, H. M., Knopman, D. S., De Vries, R., Damschroder, L., & Appelbaum, P. S., 2011, 'Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research' Neurology 77(24): 2097-2104

King, T., Brankovic, L., & Gillard, P., 2012, 'Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases' International journal of medical informatics 81(4): 279-289

Knoppers B (2000) Population Genetics and Benefit-sharing. Community Genetics 3: 212-214

Kothari, U., 2001, 'Power, Knowledge and Social Control in Participatory Development' pp139-152 in B. Cooke & U. Kothari eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books: London, New York

Laurie G and Hunter K (2004) Benefit-sharing and public trust in genetic research. In: Arnason G, Nordal S and Arnason V (eds.) Blood and Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases. Reykjavik, University of Iceland Press: 323-331

Lemke, A. A., Halverson, C., & Ross, L. F., 2012, 'Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago' American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 158(5): 1029-1037

Lewis, Freeman and Borreill (2008) Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Sustainable Forest Management in the Congo Basin. Switzerland: Berne.Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, Intercooperation and Society for Threatened People

Lofters, A. K., Shankardass, K., Kirst, M., & Quiñonez, C., 2011, 'Sociodemographic Data Collection in Healthcare Settings: An Examination of Public Opinions' Medical care 49(2): 193-199

Luchenski, S., Balasanthiran, A., Marston, C., Sasaki, K., Majeed, A., Bell, D., & Reed, J., 2012, 'Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol' BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12(1): 40

McInnis M (1999) The assent of a nation: genetics in Iceland. Clinical Genetics, 55
(4): 234-9

McClellan M (2003), Lecture, BIO 2003, Washington D.C., 23rd June 2003 [Online] Accessed at : <>

Melas A, Holm L, Forsner T, Edhborg M, Juth N, Forsell Y and Lavebratt C (2010) Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. J Med Ethics. 36: 93e98

Millum (2012) Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches. J Med Ethics, 38: 219-223

Morris, A.D., Boyle, D., McAlpine, R., Emslie-Smith, A., Jung, R.T., and MacDonald, T. (1997), 'The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (darts) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register'. British Medical Journal, 315: 524

MRC, 2007, The Use of Personal Health Information in Medical Research

NCC, 2008, Deliberative Public Engagement: Nine principles

Nicol D and Critchley C (2009) What Benefit-sharing Arrangements to people want from biobanks? A survey of public opinion in Australia. In Kaye J and Stranger M (eds.) Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance, Ashgate: 17-32

Organisation of African Unity (2000), Model Law Algeria 2000 Rights of Communities, Farmers, Breeders, and Access to Biological Resources

OECD, 2001, Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making

Parkin, L., & Paul, C., 2011, 'Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research' Journal of epidemiology and community health 65(2): 150-156

Pieczka, M., & Escobar, O., 2013, 'Dialogue and science: Innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK' Science and Public Policy 40(1): 113-126

Prainsack B and Buyx A (2011) Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics, Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report

Pullman D and Latus A (2003) Benefit-sharing in Smaller Markets: The Case of Newfoundland and Labrador. Community Genetics, 6: 178-181

Robling, M.R., Hood, K., Houston, H., Pill, R., Fay, J. & Evans, H.M., 2004, 'Public Attitudes towards the Use of Primary Care Patient Record Data in Medical Research without Consent: A qualitative study' Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 104-109

Rowe, G. & Frewer, L.J., 2005, 'A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms' Science Technology and Human Values 30(2): 251-290

Rowe, G. & Wright, G., 2001, 'Differences in Expert and Lay Judgements of Risk: Myth or reality?' Risk Analysis 21(2): 341-356

Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. & Pidgeon, N., 2005, 'Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops' Public Understanding of Science 14: 331-352

Rowe, G., Rawsthorne, D., Scarpello, T., & Dainty, J. R., 2010, 'Public engagement in research funding: a study of public capabilities and engagement methodology' Public Understanding of Science 19(2): 225-239

Ruiz-Canela, M., Valle-Mansilla, J. I., & Sulmasy, D. P., 2011, 'What Research Participants Want to Know About Genetic Research Results: The Impact of "Genetic Exceptionalism"' Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6(3): 39-46

Sciencewise, 2009, The Government's Approach to Public Dialogue on Science and Technology

Schroeder D (2007) Benefit-sharing: it's time for a definition. J Med Ethics 33: 205-209

Schroeder D and Gefenas E (2012) Realizing Benefit-Sharing - The Case of Post-Study Obligations. Bioethics. [Online].26 (6), 305-314. Available from: doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01857.x

Scottish Consumer Council, 2005, Health on-line: public attitudes to data sharing in the NHS

Scottish Government (2013), 'Joined up data for better decisions: A strategy for improving data access and analysis':

Scottish Government (2012), 'A Scotland-wide Data Linkage Framework for Statistics and Research: Consultation Paper on the Aims and Guiding Principles':

SHIP, 2011, SHIP Public Engagement: Summary of Focus Group Findings,

SHIP, 2012, Your Data and Health Research: SHIP Public Workshops,

Sheremeta L and Knoppers B (2007) Beyond the Rhetoric: Population Genetics and Benefit-Sharing (in Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution). The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, 11: 157-182

Swiderska K (2001) Participation in policy-making for access and benefit-sharing: case studies and recommendations. Bio-Brief (2)

Trinidad, S.T., Fullerton, S.M., Bares, J.M., Jarvik, G.P., Larson, E.B. & Burke, W., 2010, 'Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants' Genetics in Medicine 12(8): 486-495

UK Biobank (2007) UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Framework [Online] Available from :

United Nations (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity

United Nations, Convention on Biological Diversity (2002) Bonn Guidelines on Access to Generic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing Arising out of their Utilisation

UNESCO (2005) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Wakeford, T. (ed.), 1998, Citizen Foresight: A Tool to Enhance Democratic Policy-Making, Part 1: The Future of Food and Agriculture, London Centre for Governance Innovation and Science and the Genetics Forum, available at <> ; See also

Wakeford, T., 2010, 'Third-Order Thinking in Science Communication' Japanese Journal of Science Communication 7: 87-93

Wallace H (2005) The development of UL Biobank: Excluding scientific controversy from ethical debate. Critical Public Health, 15 (4): 323-333

Webster A, Brown N, Douglas C, Lewis G, Kaye J, Tutton R and Williams N (2008) Public attitudes to third party access and benefit-sharing: their application to UK Biobank, [Online] EGC UK Report. Available from

Wellcome Trust, 2005, Information and Attitudes: Consulting the public about biomedical science

Wilcox, D., 1994, The Guide to Effective Participation

Willison, D.J., Schwartz, L., Abelson, J., Charles, C., Swinton, M. Northcup, D. & Thabane, L., 2007, 'Alternatives to Project-specific Consent for Access to Personal Information for Health Research: What is the Opinion of the Canadian Public?' Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(6): 706-712

Willison, D. J., Swinton, M., Schwartz, L., Abelson, J., Charles, C., Northrup, D. & Thabane, L., 2008, 'Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue' BMC medical ethics 9(1): 18

Willison, D. J., Steeves, V., Charles, C., Schwartz, L., Ranford, J., Agarwal, G., & Thabane, L., 2009, 'Consent for use of personal information for health research: Do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?' BMC Medical Ethics 10(1): 10

Wilsdon, J. & Willis, R., 2004, See-Through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream

Winickoff D (2008) From Benefit-sharing to Power Sharing: Partnership Governance in Population Genomics Research. U.C. Berkeley, JSP/Centre for the Study of Law and Society Faculty Working Papers

Wynne, B., 2006, 'Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science - Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?' Community Genetics 9: 211-220


Email: Wendy van der Neut