Polypharmacy prescribing guidance - draft: consultation
We are consulting on this draft updated polypharmacy prescribing guidance. 'Appropriate Prescribing - Making medicines safe, effective and sustainable 2025-2028' aims to further improve the care of individuals taking multiple medicines through the use of 7-Steps medicine reviews and promotes a holistic approach to person-centred care.
Open
65 days to respond
Respond online
9. Case studies
9.1 Case study: Frailty without overt multimorbidity
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 69-year-old male
- Care home resident for two years - unable to manage at home post-fracture
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Concern regarding leg oedema and shortness of breath
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Ongoing frequent falls
- Fractured neck of femur - two years ago
- Dementia – mixed Alzheimer’s disease/ alcohol abuse
- Ex-smoker
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
- Amisulpride 100mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Cetirizine 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Diprobase® cream: apply as required
- Fucibet® cream: apply twice daily
- Thiamine 50mg tablets: one tablet three times daily
- Tramadol 50mg capsules: one capsule four times daily
- Trazodone 150mg capsules: one capsule at night
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 (severely frail)
- Lacked capacity at time of admission to care home two years ago, however with additional support this has improved
- Assistance of two carers required for transfer to chair - he falls frequently if he attempts to mobilise unaided
- Prompting is required to ensure that he eats and drinks
- Conversation is confused with occasional verbal aggression. He has poor short-term memory
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Feels tired (carers report he spends most of the day sleeping in his chair, and sleeps well at night)
- Reports feeling breathless
- Communication is sometimes difficult due to cognitive impairment
- There is minimal contact with his family
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 67kg, Height 172cm, BMI 22.6kg/m2
- BP 120/84 mmHg
- eGFR greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2
- LFTs within normal range
- FBC and urea and electrolytes within normal range
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 14
Most recent relevant consultations
- Two consultations in the last six months
- Chest infection for which he was prescribed an antibiotic
- A review following a fall, only minor bruising was noted on examination
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
|
---|---|---|---|
1 . Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
- bendroflumethiazide - thiamine - Fucibet® cream
- tramadol - cetirizine
|
Key concepts in this case
- Low number of conditions and medicines but still high potential for medicine related harm
- On-going review of medicine required when commenced for symptomatic relief
- Apparent low level of multimorbidity, but potential for undiagnosed treatable conditions, e.g. osteoporosis
- Over sedation a major risk to quality of life, morbidity (falls) and mortality
9.2 Case study: Frailty with multimorbidity
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 87-year-old female
- Lives at home with her husband
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Referred for medication review due to combination of frailty and multiple medicines
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Cerebrovascular disease
- Vascular dementia - two years ago
- Stroke (partial anterior circulation) - five years ago. Good recovery with mild left arm weakness main residual deficit
- Ischaemic heart disease
- Atrial fibrillation - five years ago
- ECHO (preserved LV function) - five years ago
- STEMI (thrombolysed) - 15 years ago
- Lumbar vertebral fracture - eight years ago. DXA confirmed osteoporosis
- Hypertension – 20 years ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus – 20 years ago
- Hypothyroidism – 27 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Adcal-D3® 1500mg/400iu tablets: two tablets daily
- Alendronic acid 70mg tablets: one tablet once a week
- Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Clopidogrel 75mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Digoxin 125microgram tablets: one tablet daily
- Edoxaban 60mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Gliclazide 80mg tablets: two tablets twice a day
- Indapamide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Levothyroxine 100microgram tablets: one tablet daily
- Levothyroxine 50microgram tablets: one tablet daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: two tablets three times a day
- Mirtazapine 30mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times a day
- Perindopril 4mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Tolterodine MR 4mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Zopiclone 7.5mg tablets: one tablet at night
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 (severely frail) - dependant on husband for personal care
- Mobility limited due to shortness of breath and joint pain
- Unsteady on feet, uses stick if walking outside
- Husband assists with showering and manages to dress with prompts from him
- Steadily worsening memory and needing regular re-orientation by husband
- Tendency to become much more confused with acute illness/infection
- Continence an issue. Needs assistance from husband to get to toilet
- Needs a lot of encouragement to eat and drink
- Only leaves the house to attend hospital clinics or GP appointment
- Non-smoker and no alcohol
- Husband has COPD with one hospital admission in the last year
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Main concern is bladder and incontinence issues
- Attends clinic with husband, who worries about her failing health. He underplays the large amount of care he provides - ‘we cope’
- Managing medicines is becoming more difficult and it can be a struggle to persuade her to take them
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Marked cognitive impairment and poor short-term memory apparent
- Weight 43kg, Height 157cm, BMI 17kg/m2
- BP 102/56mmHg sitting, 84/40mmHg standing
- Pulse 56bpm (irregularly irregular)
- Urea and Electrolytes: Creatinine 118micromol/L (60-120micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance 20ml/min
- Urine albumin/creatinine ratio 5mg/mmol (in diabetes ACR>3.5mg/mmol in women is considered clinically significant)
- HbA1c 34mmol/mol (5.3%)
Most recent relevant consultations
- Out of hours review after fall one month ago, no bony injury
- Suspected urinary tract infection three months ago, treated empirically with antibiotics
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
Medication Sick Day Guidance: advice given for perindopril and gliclazide (if continued) |
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Medicine targets need to consider the individual and be appropriate for them, especially in frailty
- Although most medicines here have a clear indication, many are in the range of overtreatment
- Marked strain on individual and carer with large tablet burden
- Increased frailty reduces physiological reserve for dealing with medicine side effects
- Unfortunately, many conditions that cause serious impairment of the individual’s quality of life require medicines that are associated with severe side effects e.g. continence and night sedation
- When multiple medications are changed, consider introducing changes sequentially, accounting for what matters to the individual
9.3 Case study: Care home resident with multimorbidity
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 82-year-old man
- Recently transferred to local care home following long hospital admission
- Previously:
- 20 years ago he suffered a lumber discectomy and decided to retire at 62 after a long career in business
- In retirement, he lived alone in a remote location
- Three children but none are local
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Medication review following admission to care home (change of care setting)
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Admitted to hospital seven months ago following a fall at home
- Fractured right neck of femur and repaired with dynamic hip screw
- Confused post operatively which resolved but remained cognitively impaired
- Concerns raised at time of admission, house noted to be in a mess, no food in house and general state of ill repair
- Family do not live locally and had not seen him recently
- Diagnosed with dementia and unable to return home due to combination of mobility and cognitive impairment
- No welfare power of attorney and long wait in hospital for guardianship to support discharge
- Little medical contact in year prior to admission
- Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with transient speech upset - five years ago
- Hypertension - five years ago
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus diagnosed - five years ago
- Bowel cancer leading to right hemicolectomy - 10 years ago
- Lumbar discectomy L4/5 - 20 years ago
- Hard of hearing
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
Currently prescribed:
- Adcal-D3® 750mg/200IU caplets: two caplets twice a day
- Amlodipine 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Aspirin 75mg dispersible tablets: one tablet daily
- Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Folic acid 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Gabapentin 300mg capsules: three capsules three times a day
- Gliclazide 80mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Lisinopril 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lisinopril 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lorazepam 500micrograms tablets: one tablet at night
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times a day
- Sertraline 100mg tablets: one tablet daily
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 - severely frail - completely dependent for all personal care
- Assistance of one needed to transfer. Stand aid hoist needed when tired
- Assistance of one to mobilise with walking aid
- Can communicate simple conversation. Often disorientated to place
- Catheter (since hospital admission) and occasional faecal incontinence
- Eats well but needs prompting and supervision
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Has enjoyed video conference contact with family who had not been in touch for a while
- Lots of foreign travel over his life and enjoys talking about this
- He is not keen to mobilise and prefers to be sedentary
- Initially he did not leave his room and engage with others but slowly engaging more and appears to enjoy that
- No current issues with pain
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
Bloods updated recently
- Weight 54kg, Height 177cm, BMI 17kg/m2
- BP 110/60 mmHg
- Creatinine 82 micromol/L (60-120 micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance 39 ml/min
- HbA1c 38 mmol/mol (5.6%)
Most recent relevant consultations
- None recently as he has been in hospital for seven months
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
|
---|---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
|
Key concepts in this case
- Transfer to long-term care is an important change of care setting and is a trigger for medication review
- Frail older adults frequently have a range of conditions with diagnosis often made when younger and fitter. Treatment targets are likely to change with time and caution is needed to prevent over treatment
- Improvements in function can be made with non-drug interventions especially in adults who have become deconditioned due to illness or social isolation. Consider nutrition as a reversible cause of decline in function
- Ensure all medications have a valid current indication
- Sedatives should be avoided especially for long-term use
- Reduced time in medication administration can free time for other activities for the individual and staff that may be more beneficial
- Social health is important, and care plan should involve exploration of individual’s interests and enjoyments
9.4 Care home resident with multimorbidity including dementia
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 78-year-old woman
- Resident in a care home
- Retired factory worker
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Request from care home for medication review
- Due to the quantity of medicines, many in the morning, can often refuse all. For the past few weeks complaining of nausea and has been sick
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Peripheral oedema/ bilateral cellulitis - started on diuretic, follow up to titrate diuretic dose and check renal function to take place in primary care
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus: new diagnosis six weeks ago during hospital admission
- Fractured humerus - six months ago following a fall
- Mixed Alzheimer’s Disease / vascular dementia - moderately severe
- She does not have capacity to make decisions about her welfare and has a welfare power of attorney in place
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Furosemide 40mg tablets: two tablets in the morning and one at lunchtime
- Furosemide 40mg if required for oedema - new this cycle as regular dose has been reduced by 40mg this cycle
- Laxido® sachets: one sachet up to twice a day as required
- Lorazepam 500 micrograms tablets: one tablet at teatime and one if required for agitation once a day
- Metformin 500mg tablets: two tablets twice daily - started six weeks ago
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times daily
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Tramadol 50mg capsules: one or two capsules three times daily
Recent acute medication:
- Fexofenadine 120mg tablets: one tablet daily for itchy rash. Taken three times in last two weeks - legs hot and itchy
- Metoclopramide 10mg tablets: one tablet up to three times daily for nausea two weeks ago - taken regularly three times daily
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily: started two weeks ago
- Wound management products/ skin emollients
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 (living with severe frailty)
From talking to care staff:
- She eats approximately two out of her three meals each day. She does not smoke and drinks rarely - one or two units of alcohol a month
- She has lost 10kg weight over the last six weeks and now weighs 96kg. Much of this has been fluid, as her legs are less swollen now and they are not weeping as much. She drinks plenty
- Her legs are sore much of the time. She will usually take analgesia when offered and can verbalise her pain
- She has had an injurious fall at least once in the past, but none in the care home
- Independent with a walking aid, but is slow due to the bandaging on her legs
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- She said her legs were sometimes sore and itchy and feel heavy and painful
- She feels sick a lot of the time
From talking to care staff:
- She has no problems swallowing food or drink. She likes paracetamol tablets halved but they stick in her throat. When given large tablets she chews these rather than swallowing them whole. This seems to be due to her dementia rather than due to her swallow
- Chewing medication seems to make her feel sick, and the number of tablets compounds this
- She refuses to take medicines a few times each week, or she takes some but not all of them. Staff are going back to try again at each medication round
- There has been no difference since starting metformin. The nausea seems to be related to the number of medicines
- Subjectively (the resident can verbalise pain) and objectively (using an observational pain score for people with dementia) the resident is in pain much of the time
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
Relevant results one month ago:
- Weight 96kg, Height 154cm, BMI 40.5kg/m2
- HbA1c 89mmol/mol (10.3%)
- Blood pressure 120/80mmHg, no postural hypotension
- Urea and electrolytes:
- Urea 22.0mmol/L (2.5-7.8mmol/L)
- Creatinine 62micromol/L (60-120 micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance greater than 60ml/min
- Albumin 33g/L (35-50 g/L)
- K 3.5mmol/L (3.5- 5.3 mmol/L)
- CRP 15mg/L (0-10mg/L); Hb 122g/L (120-160 g/L)
Most recent relevant consultations
- On follow-up visit, U&E and results were within normal range. The oedema had improved and blood pressure normal
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
Review the need for:
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
Review need for:
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
Pain relief in a person with dementia
- Not all people with dementia are able to verbalise pain. Use of an observational pain score can improve identification of pain
- Pain is often poorly assessed and inadequately managed in people with dementia – see Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines pain assessment – cognitive impairment section
Relief of itch
- Non-sedating antihistamines would usually be first line choice in an older person
- Appropriate use of wound management products and emollients by care staff relieved itch in this case
Tailoring medication formulation to suit the person
- Although more expensive, the use of liquid formulations of medicines can be clinically justified in some cases
Reduction in potentially inappropriate medication
- Tramadol can increase risk of falls, drowsiness, constipation. Use was reduced and then stopped by enabling regular use of paracetamol
- The complex interaction between the resident’s pain, mobility and mood meant that better pain relief improved her mood and her mobility. This in turn meant that lorazepam could be reduced, and the additional furosemide dose was not required (which can increase the likelihood of dehydration or renal impairment, and falls due to lower blood pressure)
- The total number of medicines prescribed and dosing frequency was reduced, allowing more time for care staff to provide other care
- As a care home resident, staff can encourage her to adhere to a healthy diet. Her physical activity can be increased since her pain is better controlled
9.5 Case study: Younger adult with intellectual disability in a care home
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 38-year-old female
- 24-hour care in group care home due to severe intellectual disability
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Care Programme Approach (CPA) called to discuss deterioration in presentation
- She had become very drowsy, has recurrent vomiting, increased seizure frequency, intermittent episodes of stupor/unresponsiveness, appears pale and clammy
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Non-oral: medications and sustenance given via gastrostomy
- Recurrent aspiration risk (including silent aspiration from secretions)
- Recurrent chest infections/pneumonia - exacerbates seizures and requires out-of-hours GP contacts
- Different seizure types – tonic-clonic, tonic, focal, myoclonic, status epilepticus (including non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE))
- Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
- Clobazam 5mg/5ml suspension: 10mg (10mls) at night (regular treatment of seizures)
- Lamotrigine 100mg dispersible tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Lamotrigine 25mg dispersible tablets: two tablets twice a day
- Metoclopramide 5mg/5ml solution: 10mg (10mls) three times daily
- Mirtazapine 15mg/5ml solution: 30mg (10mls) at night
- Phenytoin 30mg/5ml solution: 270mg (45mls) once daily at night
- Rufinamide 200mg/5ml suspension: 200mg (5mls) twice a day
- Sodium valproate (Epilim®) 200mg/5ml liquid: 1gram (25mls) twice a day
As is common in those with intellectual disability, the medication regime is static, with minimal changes in recent years, other than addition of mirtazapine.
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Non-smoker, nil alcohol, diet entirely comprised of enteral feed
- Has normal periods of alertness and interactivity, reduced when physically unwell or has had a recent seizure
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- She is non-verbal
- Elderly father and sister have ongoing contact. They are distressed but also accept that she had been given a limited life expectancy as a child.
- Fully prepared to take recommendations from the Health and Social Care Team
- Family feel that antiseizure medications (ASM) are most important, and acknowledge the anxiety caused by the introduction of the Valproate Pregnancy Prevention Programme (“Prevent”) for women of childbearing age
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 47kg, Height 155cm, BMI 19.6kg/m2
- Routine bloods are similar to her normal baseline (e.g. elevated LFTs aligned with treatment with sodium valproate and rufinamide, albumin levels within range and no recent changes)
- Chest clear on auscultation
- Urinalysis normal
Most recent relevant consultations
- Two months ago: antidepressant therapy started for signs and symptoms indicative of a depressive episode, with moderate improvement
- Four weeks ago: Valproate Pregnancy Prevention Programme annual risk assessment form completed by intellectual disability psychiatrist
- Meeting convened to discuss commencement of palliative care pathway:
- Discussion with medical team, welfare power of attorney, family and carers around immediate commencement of palliative care, including a decision not to aggressively treat symptoms of physical health, admit to hospital or provide Hospital at Home care
- Evident from case records that recent ASM therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has not taken place with documentation that regular drug monitoring is not indicated. Epilepsy nurse specialist advises that given complicated profile, it would be indicated in this instance
- Concerns raised about some aspects of the presentation being similar to neurotoxicity and/or non-convulsive status epilepticus
- Acknowledgement and documentation of medication regime including contra-indications (metoclopramide) and pharmacological agents that are difficult to manage or outwith scope of best practice guidelines (phenytoin for management of LGS)
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
Outcomes
|
Key concepts in this case
- Diagnostic overshadowing in people with intellectual disability. This occurs when a health professional makes the assumption that the behaviour of a person with intellectual disability is part of their disability without exploring other factors such as biological determinants
- People with intellectual disability often remain on medication longer than necessary and are more likely to accrue polypharmacy
- Long-standing polypharmacy: a changing presentation requires investigation due to various factors that have been subject to change e.g. biophysiology secondary to natural ageing; addition of medication due to age related physical health needs
- Role for proactive monitoring of blood serum levels in complex clinical scenario
- Reactive prescribing of anti-emetic added to sedating profile, was potentially pro-epileptic and required treatment of neurotoxicity symptoms
Additional information regarding metoclopramide:
- People with intellectual disability are more likely to have acute episodes of gastrointestinal distress and are often prescribed short courses of metoclopramide.
- Metoclopramide adverse effects include movement disorders and extrapyramidal side effects which can complicate differential diagnosis and/or lead to diagnostic overshadowing of stereotypy, subtle epileptogenic activity (i.e. the side effects of metoclopramide may be confused with signs of epilepsy). In individuals with communication deficit, this increases the risk of emergent behaviours or changes of presentation being misdiagnosed or diagnostically overshadowed (i.e. side effects of metoclopramide could be interpreted as normal behaviour in someone with intellectual disability).
- Metoclopramide is contra-indicated in epilepsy; people with intellectual disability have a 30-33% prevalence rate for epilepsy. This sub-population are more likely to develop late onset or epilepsy of older age due to atypical cerebral structures.
- All of the above may be underpinned by ongoing or longer than indicated therapy with metoclopramide.
9.6 Case study: Multimorbidity without frailty (acute pain, depression, COPD and high-risk combinations)
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 58-year-old woman
- Receptionist in local garage
- Provides support for elderly mother who lives alone and has early dementia
- Lives with husband who is out of work long-term
History of presentation/reason for review
- Ongoing ankle swelling
- Back pain difficult to manage and resistant to several strategies
- Occasional palpitations
- Persistent indigestion with heartburn
- Long-term financial worries. Increasing carer strain
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) non-STEMI - one year ago
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) – one year ago
- Diabetes type 2 - five years ago
- Hypertension – six years ago
- COPD – eight years ago
- Chronic back pain – 10 years ago
- Depression - two episodes, 11 years and four years ago
- Hypothyroidism – 24 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil known
- Amlodipine 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Aspirin 75mg dispersible tablets: one tablet daily
- Atenolol 50mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Citalopram 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Clenil® 100mcg metered dose inhaler: inhale one puff twice daily
- Co-codamol 8/500mg tablets: two tablets up to four times daily
- Diclofenac 50mg tablets: one tablet up to three times daily
- Furosemide 40mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Gabapentin 400mg capsules: one capsule three times daily
- Gliclazide 80mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Levothyroxine 50micrograms/5ml liquid: one 5ml spoonful daily
- Levothyroxine 25micrograms/5ml liquid: one 5ml spoonful daily
- Lisinopril 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lisinopril 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: two tablets three times daily
- Omeprazole 40mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Pioglitazone 30mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Salbutamol 100micrograms metered dose inhaler: inhale one or two puffs as required
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Smoking: 10–15 cigarettes a day
- Alcohol: 20 units/week
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Concerns dominated by the heart attack last year and fear of recurrence, “I don’t know what my mother and husband would do if I got too ill to work or look after her.”
- “I feel breathless whenever I have to rush or climbing the stairs; Do I really need to take so many pills; my ankles are getting really swollen”
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 95.2kg, Height 165cm, BMI 35kg/m2
- HbA1c 86 mmol/mol (10%)
- BP 150/85mmHg
- Spirometry shows mild obstruction
- No urinary protein detected
- eGFR 55ml/min/1.73m2
Most recent relevant consultations
- Flu-like illness leading to exacerbation of COPD two years ago
- Chest pain 12 months ago - found to be in AF on admission and troponin positive. Angiogram showed widespread coronary artery disease but not severe enough to warrant revascularisation. Echocardiography showed normal left ventricular systolic function
- On dual aspirin and clopidogrel for one year. Recently moved to aspirin monotherapy
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Large number of medications are likely to be needed and effective, however more support may be required as adherence could be an issue
- Identifying untreated indications (in this case atrial fibrillation)
- Identifying high risk drug combinations particularly in those on multiple medications
- Effect of reduced renal function on medication dose, e.g. metformin
- Link with non-pharmacological management
- A longer consultation may be required to ensure that there is time to cover any concerns and issues and focus on medication and deprescribe where appropriate, with appropriate follow-up
- The need for a multidisciplinary approach
9.7 Case study: High risk combination - multiple blood thinners
Case summary
Background details: (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 81-year-old female
- Retired primary school teacher
- Lives alone (widowed four years ago)
History of presentation/reason for review
- Attends with her daughter who has noted that she is struggling with medication packets and medication regimen. She is asking if a compliance aid is suitable
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) - transient left arm and face weakness resolved - one year ago
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) - two years ago
- Ischaemic heart disease
- Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction - three years ago, angiogram, no stents, managed medically
- Depression following husband’s death - four years ago
- Hypertension – 14 years ago
- Hypothyroidism – 35 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional remedies and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
- Atorvastatin 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Citalopram 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Citalopram 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Clopidogrel 75mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Co-codamol 30/500 tablets: take one or two tablets four to six hourly as required for pain
- Edoxaban 60mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Levothyroxine 100microgram tablets: one tablet daily
- Levothyroxine 25microgram tablets: one tablet daily
- Lisinopril 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Zopiclone 3.75mg tablets: one tablet at night
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Supported by two daughters who live locally with shopping and domestic tasks
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 6 (moderately frail)
- Mobile with a stick for short distances
- House on one level
- Short walks outside if accompanied
- No power of attorney
- Non-smoker, occasional alcohol at celebrations and special occasions
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Finding multiple medicines challenging to take
- Supported by daughters but feeling much more isolated since COVID-19 lockdown. Previous social interactions have not restarted and some worries about going out
- Not walking as far and not feeling as able to walk as far
- Keen to remain as independent as possible at home
- Worried over risk of fall after fracture several years ago which occurred the year before husband’s death. He was unwell at the time, and this was very stressful. Both were in hospital concurrently at one point
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 52kg, Height 160cm, BMI 20kg/m2
- BP last three readings: 142/63mmHg, 118/45mmHg, 138/56mmHg
- Urea and electrolytes:
- Urea 10mmol/L (2.5-7.8mmol/L)
- Creatinine 118micromol/L (60-120micromol/L)
- eGFR 38ml/min/1.73m2
- Calculated creatinine clearance 27ml/min
- Recent thyroid function tests (TFTs) within normal range
Most recent consultations
- Suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) six months ago, presented with confusion and dysuria, and treated empirically with antibiotics
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- High risk drug combinations. On two blood thinners as a second indication (AF) occurred after the first indication of coronary heart disease. Combination not indicated or needed and is high risk
- Falls risk from sedatives and tight BP control
- Effect of renal function on medication dose – edoxaban
- Adverse effects of social isolation on function
- Non-pharmacological interventions
9.8 Case study: Chronic pain – opioids
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 74-year-old female
- Lives in ground floor flat
- Mobilises with walking aid but currently housebound
History of presentation/reason for review
- Identified for review by a search in her GP practice (using Scottish Therapeutics Utility (STU)), as she is prescribed a high dose opioid (>50mg morphine equivalent)
- Currently taking Longtec® 90mg daily plus Shortec® 30mg daily (i.e. 240mg morphine equivalent daily (MED) dose)
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Lower back pain episode - six years ago
- Transient diplopia - cause uncertain – 10 years ago
- Essential hypertension – 14 years ago
- Barrett’s oesophagus with hiatus hernia – 14 years ago
- Chronic lower back pain - 24 years ago
- Cerebrovascular disease – 25 years ago
- Seronegative polyarthropathy – 25 years ago
- Osteoporosis – 26 years ago
- Anxiety – 31 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
- Adverse reaction to aspirin previously - GI upset
Current medication
- Amlodipine 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Clopidogrel 75mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Diazepam 2mg tablets: one tablet daily in the morning
- Longtec® 40mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Longtec® 5mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Mirtazapine 15mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Nitrofurantoin 50mg capsules: one capsule at night
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule twice daily
- Oxybutynin 2.5mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets three times daily
- Quinine sulphate 200mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Ramipril 10mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Shortec® 10mg capsules: one capsule six hourly, as required
- Vitamin D3 1000IU capsules: one capsule daily
- Zopiclone 3.75mg tablets: one tablet at night
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 6 (moderately frail)
- Medication in compliance aid
- No difficulty swallowing medicines
- Carers four times a day for personal care/medication prompt/meals/shopping
- Appears a bit confused at times but lucid and normally perceptive (MMSE score 26/30 on testing three months ago)
- Smokes 15 cigarettes a day
- Reports no alcohol or recreational/over the counter drug use
- Reports poor appetite and diet but weight stable at 32kg:
- Three years ago 38kg
- Two years ago 34.1kg, with dietetic input started
- Now on sip feeds and carers add in full cream milk, biscuits etc
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Very fixed mindset on requirement for all medicines. Denies any side effects
- Would like to reduce pain levels - widespread pain in back, joints, and stomach. She rates her pain as 10/10
- Would like to go to bingo but has lost confidence to leave the flat
- Keeps herself happy by feeding birds/foxes - misses her dog who died last year
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 32kg (stable for last six months), Height 140cm, BMI 16.3kg/m2
- Urea and electrolytes– within range three months ago, eGFR greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2, calculated creatinine clearance 33mL/min
- BP average over three readings 145/85mmHg, no postural drop
- Serum cholesterol 4.4mmol/l (<5.0mmol/L), HDL/LDL ratio 3.8 (for women <2.5)
- DXA six years ago after being on bisphosphonate for five years. T= -2.7 Advised to stop bisphosphonate for two years and then re DXA - GP to refer again
Most recent relevant consultations
- Pain and polypharmacy review during a home visit three months ago. Brief Pain Inventory score average is 9/10 (unable to score interference questions, analgesic effectiveness 0-10%)
- GAD score 9/21
- Weekly phone calls to practice over last six months for a variety of complaints: urinary tract infection (UTI), upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), stomach pains
Follow-up:
- Regular contact with community link worker and follow-up with pharmacist to implement pain and polypharmacy medication review changes. Medication changes discussed, but reluctant to try some of them. Signposted to the patient resources on “My Live Well with Pain” website
- Follow up every four to six weeks to review medication changes - slow, gradual changes with regular reassessment and individual choice over which medications to deprescribe and when
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
Discuss ADR and potential harm, increasing risk of falls, hyperalgesia, impact on cognition, sedation, immune suppression, query a factor in recurrent UTIs
Medication Sick Day Guidance given for ramipril |
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
After four months follow-up, she had reduced to 45mg oxycodone (90 MED). Pain still 9/10, but now going out with carer one day a week and visiting shops |
Key concepts in this case
- Reducing medicine related harm compared to person-centredness
- A person-centred approach is required as individuals often feel medicines are necessary and report no side effects. However, a lack of efficacy and risk of adverse effects must be considered and ensure safety in prescribing.
- There is a need to build a therapeutic relationship with trust to support and influence change, and to deprescribe medicines
- The need for subsequent and ongoing reviews to address a stepped and supported approach to trials of reduction and deprescribing, ensuring shared decision-making at every stage
9.9 Case study: Chronic pain – anticonvulsants
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 47-year-old female
- Police officer
History of presentation/reason for review
- She self-presents concerned about the impact of medicines and side effects on her ability to do her job. Recently she had tried to stop them all completely and felt awful, like she had the flu. She is concerned that she is addicted
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Chronic low back pain and neuropathic leg pain following accident at work - two years ago
- Menopause - three years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
- Femoston-conti® 1mg/5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Gabapentin 300mg capsules: three capsules three times daily
- Paracetamol 500mg caplets: two tablets up to four times daily when required
- Tramadol 50mg capsules: two capsules four times daily
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Lives with husband and two teenage sons
- After accident was moved from being on the beat to a desk job as was overly sedated on medication
- Not as active due to back and leg pain, and sedentary job
- Avoids driving due to drowsiness
- Concerned she is putting on weight despite a healthy diet
- Non-smoker
- Alcohol less than seven units/week
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- “Pain has been improving so I tried to stop the medicines because they made me so tired. Burning and shooting feeling had gone”
- “One day I decided enough was enough, and just stopped taking the gabapentin and the tramadol. I don’t really use the paracetamol very often”
- “I felt so bad, my pain was worse, it was as though I had flu and I ended up taking them again - I’m scared to try stopping them now”
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 74.3kg, Height 168cm, BMI 26kg/m2
- Serum creatinine 84micromol/L (60-120micromol/L)
- FBC in normal range
- MRI - nothing abnormal
Most recent relevant consultations
- Gabapentin dose was increased eight months ago following a fall which had flared up her pain
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
• Pain improved, therefore same level of medication no longer required
• Side effects:
Drowsiness
weight gain
dependency (evidenced by withdrawal)
• High risk medicine combinations
• Deprescribing – supporting the individual to safely reduce or stop medicines
9.10 Case study: Chronic pain – Antidepressants
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 54-year-old male
- Works as a painter and decorator
History of presentation/reason for review
- Attends appointment due to uncontrolled pain
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain - two years ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus - four years ago
- Gout - seven years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Allopurinol 100mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Amitriptyline 50mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Atorvastatin 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Duloxetine 60mg capsules: one capsule daily (started three months prior to review)
- Metformin 500mg tablets: two tablets twice daily
- Tramadol 50mg capsules: two capsules when required for pain (no recent change – average use two to three times daily)
Over the counter medicines: nil
Occasional cannabis use for neuropathic pain
Lifestyle and current function
- Keeps active with regular walking
- Does not smoke
- Drinks eight units of alcohol a week (on his days off work)
- Has significantly changed diet over past two years since diabetes worsened
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Wants pain to stop, especially during the day. He is particularly struggling when working
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 70kg, Height 174cm, BMI 23kg/m2 (with changes to diet and lifestyle he has managed to significantly reduce weight over past two years – nothing sinister suspected)
- BP 128/67mmHg
- Urea and Electrolytes in normal range, eGFR greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2
- HbA1c 50mmol/mol (6.7%)
- Thyroid function tests (TFTs) in normal range
- Bone profile in normal range
- Lipids in normal range
Most recent relevant consultations
- Duloxetine started for neuropathic pain three months prior to review
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Optimisation of medication to maximise benefit and minimise risk to the individual
- Acceptance of, and education, around chronic pain conditions. Use of self-management strategies will support chronic pain management in conjunction with pharmacological options
9.11 Case study: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe frailty
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 71 years old female, with very severe frailty
- Lives with husband who is her carer
History of presentation/reason for review
- Home visit by frailty multidisciplinary team (MDT), after recent fall and hospitalisation
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Malignant neoplasm of cervix – 8 months ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) – 8 years ago
- Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) – 9 years ago
- angina pectoris – 9 years ago
- acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) – 7 years ago
- Essential hypertension – 11 years ago
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – 12 years ago
- Depressive episode, unspecified – 16 years ago
- Hypothyroidism – 25 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
Currently prescribed:
- Ascorbic acid 500mg tablets: two tablets morning and night
- Blood glucose testing strips: use as directed
- Carbocisteine 375mg capsules: two capsules three times a day
- Doxazosin 4mg tablet: one tablet daily
- Ferrous fumarate 210mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Folic acid 5mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Furosemide 40mg tablets: two tablets twice a day
- Glyceryl trinitrate 400micrograms/dose pump sublingual spray: one to two puffs under the tongue if required for chest pain
- Insulin lispro 100units/ml solution for injection 3ml pre-filled pen: to be injected twice a day
- Insulin glargine 300units/ml solution for injection 1.5ml pre-filled pen: to be injected as directed by diabetes specialist nurse
- Insulin needles: to be used as directed
- Lactulose 3.1-3.7g/5ml oral solution: 10ml twice a day
- Lancets 0.2mm/33 gauge: use as directed
- Levothyroxine sodium 100microgram tablets: one tablet once daily
- Liraglutide 6mg/ml solution for injection 3ml pre-filled: 1.2mg once daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: two tabs twice daily before breakfast and evening meal
- Mirtazapine 45mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Oxycodone 5mg modified-release tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Pregabalin 25mg capsules: one capsule twice a day
- Salbutamol 100micrograms/dose inhaler CFC free: one or two puffs up to four times daily as required
- Salbutamol 2.5mg/2.5ml nebuliser liquid unit dose vials: use one nebule when required as directed by respiratory clinic
- Solifenacin 5mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Trelegy Ellipta® 92mcg/55mcg/222mcg per dose device: one inhalation once daily
- Venlafaxine 75mg tablets: two tablets in the morning and one at night
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 8 (very severely frail)
- Recent fall and hospital admission, has walking frame but does not use it
- Ex-smoker
- On long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Reducing risk of falls “I don’t want to be in hospital”
- “Can I take less tablets? Do I need them all?”
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 104kg, Height 161cm, BMI 40.1kg/m2
- BP 123/72mmHg
- eGFR 60ml/min/1.73m2, calculated creatinine clearance 42ml/min
- Urine albumin 3mg/ml, urine creatinine 9.1mmol/l (9 - 18mmol/L), ACR 0.3mg/mmol (in diabetes ACR>3.5mg/mmol in women is considered clinically significant)
- HbA1c 57mmol/mol (7.4%)
- Cholesterol 6.3mmol/L (<5.0mmol/L)
- LFTs within normal range
- TSH within normal range
- FBC within normal range
- Folate >20nanograms/mL (2.5-20nanograms/mL)
Most recent relevant consultations
- Recent fall and hospitalisation
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
Medication Sick Day Guidance given for furosemide and metformin |
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Increasing frailty requiring de-escalation of diabetes and hypertension therapies
- Opportunity for review of all medication, identifying:
what matters to the individual - reduced medication burden
unnecessary therapies
increased risk of adverse effects
9.12 Case study: Chronic Constipation
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 56-year-old male
- Long-term unemployed
History of presentation/reason for review
- The practice has a significant number of people prescribed long-term opioids and decided to review them
- He was identified after running a search in the GP practice using the Scottish Therapeutics Utility (STU)
- He has been prescribed Oxypro® (oxycodone modified release) 40mg twice a day for several years with no recent review
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Iron deficiency anaemia – 3 years ago
- Urinary incontinence – 5 years ago
- Secondary pulmonary hypertension – 6 years ago
- Mild left ventricular dysfunction (well controlled, no overt symptoms) – 6 years ago
- Atrial flutter – 8 years ago
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 – 8 years ago
- Obstructive sleep apnoea – 9 years ago
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – 10 years ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (diet controlled) – 14 years ago
- Essential hypertension – 14 years ago
- Severe obesity – 30 years ago
- Postural scoliosis contributing to back pain – 34 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor 1 blockers due to cough
Currently prescribed:
- Amiodarone 200mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Apixaban 5mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Aspirin 75mg enteric coated tablets: one tablet daily
- Bisoprolol 10mg tablets: one tablet each morning
- Bumetanide 1mg tablets: two tablets morning and lunchtime
- Ferrous fumarate 210mg tablets: one tablet three times a day
- Gabapentin 100mg capsules: one capsule three times a day
- Oxypro® 40mg modified release tablets: one tablet morning and night
- Salbutamol 100microgram metered dose inhaler: two puffs when required
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Shortec® 10mg capsules: one capsule when required for pain (maximum twice a day)
- Solifenacin 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Spironolactone 25mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Trelegy® dry powder inhaler 92/55/22micrograms/dose: one inhalation daily
- He uses a weekly monitored dose system (MDS) “dosette box” from the local pharmacy for 10 years
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Smoker – 20 cigarettes a day
- Does not drink alcohol
- Lives alone and spends most of the time at home
- Uses continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment for obstructive sleep apnoea at home
- Does not participate in any form of physical activity
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- “I just take what I am prescribed. I keep getting prescriptions so I must need all the medicines”
- Lacks understanding regarding his medication and would like to take less medication
- Would like to feel less constipated and lose weight
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 120kg, Height 175cm, BMI 39.2kg/m2
- BP 130/70mmHg, pulse 65bpm
- Urea and Electrolytes within normal range
- Creatinine 72micromol/L (60-120micromol/L)
- eGFR greater than 60 ml/min/1.73m2
- FBC all within normal range
- HbA1c 45mmol/mol (6.3%) (two months ago)
- Cholesterol 4.7mmol/L (<5.0mmol/L), HDL 1.2mmol/L (0.9-1.5mmol/L)
- LFTs all within normal range
- TSH 1.4mU/L (0.27-4.20mU/L)
All blood tests were taken two weeks ago in preparation for clinic review
Most recent relevant consultations
- He complained of constipation during a telephone consultation a few months ago. Senna started.
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Inappropriate prescribing of long-term opioids and gabapentin for chronic pain without review
- Multifactorial nature of constipation e.g. opioid induced, iron supplements, anticholinergic burden, lack of exercise and dietary fibre
- High risk drug combinations and managing the risk – inappropriate long-term prescribing of dual antiplatelets, and potential need for gastrointestinal protection
- Solifenacin was prescribed for urinary incontinence which may have been aggravated by chronic constipation. Solifenacin may have contributed to worsening constipation and in turn added to urinary incontinence symptoms, and hence the individual perceived no benefit from it
- The challenges of managing medication in an MDS. He had lost ownership and understanding of his medication and health conditions. The case presents the practical issues when medication needs to be changed, and the potential delays. Considering other options such as a prompt chart or downloading the national Polypharmacy app may have negated the need for an MDS in the first instance
9.13 Case study: Adult with Parkinson’s disease
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- Male, aged 78 years
- Retired painter and decorator
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Parkinson’s disease medication review as increasing issues with side effects to medication (feeling sleepy). In addition, starting to have problems with swallowing, particularly in the morning.
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Swallowing difficulties - 6 months ago
- Chronic pain – 3 years ago
- Depression – 6 years ago
- Parkinson’s disease (PD). Diagnosis after presenting with tremor and balance problems – 10 years ago
- Falls – 11 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation and herbal remedies)
Currently prescribed:
- Co-beneldopa 12.5mg/50mg dispersible tablet: one tablet daily (bedtime)
- Co-beneldopa 25mg/100mg tablets: one tablet four times daily
- Co-codamol 30mg/500 tablets: two tablets four times daily
- Colecalciferol 400 unit tablet: one daily
- Laxido® sachets: one sachet when required
- Peptac® suspension: 10ml four times daily when required
- Pregabalin 25mg capsules: one capsule twice daily
- Sertraline 100mg tablets: one tablet daily
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs):
- phenoxymethylpenicillin, flucloxacillin
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Housebound, lives with wife
- Medication is packed into monitored dosage system (dosette box labelled breakfast, lunchtime, teatime and bedtime) and delivered by local pharmacy
- Carers visit three times a day (breakfast, lunch and bedtime) to assist with activities of daily living (ADL), including prompting medication. Teatime dose is managed by the individual himself
- Rockwood Frailty Scale 6 (moderate frailty)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Ask person to complete questions to prepare for the review (PROMs)
- Individual and his wife want to have a review of medication because of side effects and increasing problems with swallowing
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local lab reference ranges may vary
- Weight 61kg, Height 170cm, BMI 21kg/m2
- BP 128/79 mmHg
- Urea and Electrolytes, LFTs and cholesterol in normal range
- FBC in normal range
Most recent relevant consultations
- Seen by specialist PD service eight months ago, with no changes to medication then
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
|
---|---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask person to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask person or carer to complete the post-review PROMs questions after their review |
Agreed plan
|
|
Key concepts in this case
- The need to involve the person with Parkinson’s disease, their family members, carers and PD specialist team in agreeing a care plan
- The importance of administering antiparkinsonian medicines at appropriate times and suitable formulations
- Information regarding medication timings is easily accessible across interfaces of care
- The potential for adverse effects with antiparkinsonian medicines and discussion of benefit versus risk
- Discuss advance care planning such as anticipatory care plans and Welfare Power of Attorney provisions and document in relevant clinical systems (e.g. KIS)
9.14 Case study: Depression and Health Inequalities
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 54-year-old male who currently lives alone
- Recent loss of employment as a joiner for a local window company
- Unmarried and lives alone
- No children but father and a supportive friend who live nearby
- Has a dog
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Attends the practice with low mood after starting antidepressant therapy two months ago for depression
- He attends with a supportive friend who is concerned as he has cancelled plans to meet and avoids contact with others, becoming more socially isolated
- On a telephone review four weeks ago, he reported no change to his mood but today has signs of self-neglect
- Has lost half a stone in weight due to reduced appetite, early morning wakening, increased rumination, and a loss of motivation
- He is feeling stressed and anxious about his financial situation, having recently lost his job. He is in rent arrears and has a number of credit card debts. He reports difficulty with managing the rising costs of heating his home and is only eating one meal a day. His internet has recently been cut off
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Depressive episode, started on antidepressant therapy two months ago
- No previous past medical history of depression/ anxiety
- Asthma (diagnosed in childhood) well-controlled
- Family history of hypothyroidism
- Harmful use of alcohol in the past
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Clenil® (beclomethasone dipropionate) 100microgram meter dose inhaler: two puffs twice a day
- Citalopram 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Salbutamol inhaler 100mcg meter dose inhaler: two puffs up to four times a day (two inhalers ordered in last 12 months)
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
At review:
- Does little exercise and spends most of his time watching TV at present.
- Has consumed alcohol to harmful levels in the past when has felt anxious or sleep has been poor. Not currently drinking alcohol to harmful levels
- Does not smoke cigarettes but does use cannabis on a nightly basis as he finds that this helps with his sleep
- Diet is high in fat, sugar, salt. Doesn’t tend to cook for himself. Finding food expensive.
“What matters to me” (patient ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- When asked about his goals he struggles to identify any other than wanting to feel better, but feels helpless as to how to change his situation
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
Recent blood tests
- including thyroid function tests within normal range
- low in folate (due to dietary deficiency)
- Weight 95kg, Height 178cm, BMI 30kg/m2
- PHQ-9 score increased from 14/27 (moderate depression) eight weeks ago to 20/27 today (severe depression).
Most recent relevant consultations
- Avoiding eye contact and when asked about mood becomes tearful reporting fleeting, occasional thoughts of ending his life. Whilst no current active plans he discloses has thought about different ways of ending his life (including taking an overdose). He is adamant he would not act on these, citing his father and dog as protective factors.
- He reports taking his citalopram every day for eight weeks but felt little/ no benefit.
- More recently has shared his difficult social circumstances, previously felt unable to do this because he felt ashamed. Building trust with the same healthcare professional (HCP) has helped him feel confident to disclose these wider social issues.
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
|
---|---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
Management with combination of:
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
|
Key concepts in this case
- Presenting with worsening symptoms of depression, despite starting antidepressant medication
- Change of SSRI more appropriate than increase dose (due to flat dose effect of SSRIs)
- Signs of distress with fleeting suicidal thoughts and socially isolated
- Has attempted low intensity interventions with limited benefit – may struggle to engage with further online support due to low motivation and feelings of helplessness
9.15 Case study: Anxiety
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 24-year-old female
- Office administrator
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Reports a six-month history of increasing anxiety including worry, mild irritability, difficulties concentrating, trouble relaxing and marked sleep disturbance
- Caffeine intake – four cups of coffee per day plus a can of cola in afternoon
- Increasing difficulty concentrating which is having an impact on her work. She has been going in early and staying late as she is taking extra time to both complete and then check over her work due to concerns that she may make a mistake
- She has avoided coming into the practice as she is keen to avoid medication
- Parents have noticed she is more on edge, restless and seems tired all the time
- She has no intent or plans to harm herself or others - no family history of mental health conditions
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- None
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
Currently prescribed: nil
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Single, no dependents
- Lives at home with her parents
- Alcohol: six units at a weekend
- Non-smoker
- No recreational drug use
- Very supportive group of friends, parents and older brother that she can talk to about her anxiety
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Keen to reduce the time she spends worrying, improve her sleep, and feel less tense
- Although she is experiencing some difficulties at work, she is keen to avoid time off and is still managing to go to the gym
- Keen to avoid medication
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- GAD-7 score 10 (moderate anxiety)
- No recent test results as no previous ill health
Most recent relevant consultations
No previous consultations
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Moderate Generalised Anxiety Disorder
- Non-pharmacological management preferred by patient, and matches with step care as per NICE guidelines223
- Self-help and cCBT fits with individual’s preferences, needs and ease of access
- Avoidance of potential polypharmacy
9.16 Case study: Post traumatic stress disorder with “street benzo” use
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 32-year-old male
- Currently unemployed
History of presentation/ reason for review
- Requesting diazepam for ongoing sleep problems
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- No mental or physical health comorbidities recorded in notes
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
- Currently no prescribed medication. Takes street benzodiazepines.
- Previously prescribed dihydrocodeine for pain related to injuries from assault (broken ankle). On discharge he received a further two weeks’ supply. He did not attend physiotherapy appointments
Over the counter medicines: Solpadeine Max® (codeine 12.8mg and paracetamol 500mg)
Lifestyle and current function
- Single, no dependents
- Lives alone
- Alcohol – current intake is around 30 units week, has been trying to reduce intake
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Keen to have a safe option to control symptoms, reduce street benzos, and OTC co-codamol use
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- No recent bloods or tests
Most recent relevant consultations
During the consultation:
- When discussing his sleep routine, he avoids going to bed because he has increased anxiety, with flashbacks and recurring nightmares related to a serious assault last year
- He states his emotions are “all over the place” making him feel “out of control” and that he has memory problems. He explains the assault has triggered memories of trauma earlier in his life.
- He confirms that he still experiences some pain from the assault and started to buy OTC co-codamol to help manage this
- By providing a safe place where his concerns are acknowledged, he discloses taking street benzodiazepines and Solpadeine Max® with alcohol, in increasing doses, which helps block out overwhelming thoughts and feelings. He visits various pharmacies to buy the co-codamol, as some refuse the sale due to the frequency of requests
- He reports that his mood is low with fleeting thoughts of suicide. However, he confirms he does not have any immediate suicidal plans and protective factors, include his family and friends
- He becomes more tearful and agitated when discussing polydrug use. He is aware of risks having witnessed a friend’s non-fatal overdose and thought a prescription might reduce the risks with street drugs and OTC medicines
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- PTSD presentation (possible complex trauma) and may require further specialist support
- Co-occurring non-prescribed polydrug use – challenges in assessing possible dependency with uncertainty around overall dose and alcohol consumption
- Increased risks of overdose (near fatal or fatal)
- Risks associated with alcohol and street drug use:
Benzodiazepines: sudden withdrawal: rapid heart rate, confusion, seizures.
Long term use can cause anxiety, depression, insomnia, memory loss
Alcohol: sudden withdrawal: delirium, with or without seizures.
Long-term use can lead to cognitive impairment
- Potential liver damage from excess paracetamol use and alcohol consumption
- Possible alcohol dependency – AUDIT score indicates referral for specialist assessment
9.17 Case study: Bipolar disorder and lithium
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 67-year-old retired female
History of presentation/reason for review
- Attends the practice for a routine medication review
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Nocturnal leg cramps – 18 months ago
- Hypertension – 20 years ago
- Primary hypercholesterolaemia – 20 years ago
- Bipolar Type 1 disorder – 38 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Atorvastatin 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lithium (Priadel®) 400mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Quinine sulfate 200mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Ramipril 10mg capsules: one capsule daily (increased two months prior to review)
Over the counter medicines: none except ibuprofen, “simple painkillers”, but none taken in recent months. Does not take any herbal remedies or street drugs
Lifestyle and current function
- Keeps active (walking)
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 3 (managing well)
- Drinks around five units of alcohol per week, although reports this can vary considerably
- Does not smoke
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- She is happy with current therapy and feels medicines are working well and reports no concerns.
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
Examination
- Drowsiness and fine tremor noted – no other concerns noted at mental state examination (no other obvious concerns in appearance, behaviour, speech, thought form/content, perception, cognition, insight, mood and capacity)
Recent blood tests
- Weight 64kg, Height 163cm, BMI 24kg/m2
- Average home blood pressure reading: 164/88mmgHg (8 weeks prior to review); 134/84mmHg (4 weeks prior to review)
- Urea and Electrolytes satisfactory with no deterioration in eGFR
- Creatinine 70micromol/L (60-120micromol/L), eGFR greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2
- Cholesterol within normal range (on current treatment)
- LFTs, TSH, bone profile within normal ranges
- Lithium levels (0.4–1mmol/L):
- 0.98mmol/L (two weeks prior to review)
- 0.90mmol/L (four months prior to review)
- 0.82mmol/L (one year prior to review)
- 0.70mmol/L (four years prior to review)
- 0.72mmol/L (six years prior to review)
Most recent relevant consultations
- Ramipril increased eight weeks prior to review due to uncontrolled hypertension
- Recent psychiatry letter noting that her mental state has been stable for over seven years
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
Ask patient to complete PROMs (questions to prepare for my review) before their review |
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- It is important to look at trends in lithium levels rather than individual levels, and how this relates to the person’s mental health. In this case the bipolar disorder was managed adequately at lithium levels around 0.7mmol/L and despite the recent level (0.98mmol/L) being in reference range, the dose may be kept at an unnecessarily high level. This puts them at increased risk of side effects (e.g. fine tremor, drowsiness). Given the length of time her mood has been stabilised, levels lower than 0.7mmol/L could also be considered
- It generally takes five to seven days for lithium levels to fully adjust. Therefore, levels should be taken after at least five days on any new dosage regimen. In some scenarios (such as a recent overdose) a level earlier than five days may be obtained to establish whether lithium levels are trending upwards or downwards. As there was no urgency in this scenario, two weeks was chosen. Levels should ideally be taken 12 hours post dose (if on twice daily regimen the dose should be delayed allowing for this)
- Lithium follows linear pharmacokinetics and dose reductions should be made accordingly. Specialist mental health teams should be contacted for advice where required. If any dose reduction is made to lithium, the individual’s mental state should be monitored during this transition period for any deterioration.
- Individuals should be counselled on lithium including importance of monitoring, signs and symptoms of toxicity and factors that can influence lithium levels.
- Medication interactions and dehydration are common factors that increase lithium levels.
- Individuals should be offered the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) patient information (or similar). This includes a lithium record booklet and alert card. This card can be a useful prompt to individuals and healthcare professionals supplying or prescribing medications to take into account potential interactions. In this case it might have avoided ibuprofen being purchased in addition to lithium
- Individuals may require medication combinations which interact with lithium (resulting in higher lithium levels). If so, it is important they are fully aware of the risk and fully understand the signs and symptoms of toxicity, and what to do should these occur. More frequent monitoring could be considered.
- Several medications can prolong the QTc interval. It is important to identify these (especially in at risk individuals) and discuss any additional risk with therapy, or alternative treatment options where available.
- Other points to consider as part of a comprehensive polypharmacy review are:
Appropriateness of quinine in leg cramps
Hypertension management including the impact of NSAIDs
9.18 Case study: Antipsychotics in dementia
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 75-year-old retired female
- Reduced mobility due to left sided weakness (previous stroke)
- Lives with husband. Dependent on husband and carers for activities of daily living
History of presentation/reason for review
- Admitted to hospital with fall, found by husband on floor beside the bed in the morning
- Presentation of worsening cognition and function over the past three months
- Over the past week, sudden increase in confusion, agitation and aggression. Refusing medicines today. Eating and drinking normally
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Cerebrovascular disease: right partial anterior circulation stroke (PACS) leading to mild left arm and leg weakness three years ago
- Mixed dementia (Alzheimer’s/vascular)
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Aspirin 75mg dispersible tablets: one tablet daily
- Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Donepezil 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Perindopril 4mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Solifenacin 5mg tablets: one tablet daily (started one month ago for urinary frequency)
Recent acute medication:
- Hydroxyzine 25mg tablets: one tablet at night (started two weeks ago for an itchy rash on back)
- Risperidone 250 microgram tablets: one tablet twice daily (prescribed one day prior to admission but not taken yet)
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Carers four times a day
- Mobile with a stick for short distances, lives in ground floor flat
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 (severely frail)
- Ex-smoker (stopped 10 years ago), no alcohol
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)
- Lacks capacity for discussion
- Husband is unable to cope with her increased aggression at home and concerned that she is refusing medication.
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 65kg, Height 160cm, BMI 25.4kg/m2
- Blood pressure 120/75mmHg, no postural hypotension
- Pulse: 50 beats/minute
- Urea and Electrolytes:
- within normal range
- eGFR greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2
- Liver function tests: within range
- CRP, white cell count, temperature within normal range
- MSSU: nil of note
- Full blood count (reference ranges given in brackets):
- Haemoglobin 85g/L (115-165g/L)
- MCV 187fL (80-100fL)
- Serum folate 2.5micrograms/L (4.6-18.7micrograms/L)
- Serum vitamin B12 96nanograms/L (180-700nanograms/L)
- Ferritin 95micrograms/L (15-300micrograms/L)
- QTc: 470ms (normal range equivalent or less than 470ms in female)
- Bowel chart: no bowel movement for past three days
- Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score 4
- CT head: normal
Most recent relevant consultations
- Deterioration of cognition and function over past three months, awaiting old age psychiatry review
- Urinary frequency: solifenacin started one month ago after trial of non-pharmacological options
- Rash (itchy) causing distress especially at night: hydroxyzine 25mg at night prescribed
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan Delirium:
|
Key concepts in this case
• Acute onset in mental status or new onset confusion? THINK DELIRIUM
• Use TIME bundle:
Triggers: identify potential triggers (e.g. constipation, anticholinergics)
Investigate: record national early warning system (NEWS), screen for infection, take bloods
Manage: document diagnosis of delirium, causes and plan
Engage: engage with patient/family/carers, complete “what matters to me”. If patient does not have capacity to consent to care, complete Adult With Incapacity (AWI) documentation
• Use non-pharmacological options such as environment (e.g. quiet room), verbal and non-verbal escalation techniques
• Anticholinergic medications can cause symptoms such as dry mouth, constipation and urinary retention. Exposure to anticholinergic agents has been linked to impaired cognition and physical decline. They may also be associated with falls, increased mortality and cardiovascular events. The anticholinergic effect of individual medicines varies greatly between individual patients, and the effect of multiple medicines are cumulative
• Covert administration: requires a formal agreement between healthcare professionals and carers (it should only be completed for patients who lack capacity to agree to treatment). See Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland: Covert medication good practice guide. Refer to local policy and procedures. Set a date for review of the continued need for covert administration
• Cholinesterase inhibitors: stopping established treatment may lead to loss of cognition or function, which may not be regained if the medication is restarted. The risks and benefits of deprescribing should be considered carefully
9.19 Case study: Antipsychotic use following recent hospital discharge
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 78-year-old female normally independent and still driving
- Lives alone after husband’s death eight years ago
- No family locally, but good support from neighbours and friends
- Lives in bungalow with no stairs
- No particular exercise but will go on short walks
History of presentation/reason for review
- Recent discharge from hospital and needs a medication review
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Discharged two weeks ago after short admission (three days) with delirium from a suspected chest or urine infection
- Breast cancer - wide local excision followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy – 14 years ago
- Hypertension – 24 years ago
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus – 24 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
Medication prior to recent admission
- Amitriptyline 50mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Amlodipine 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
- Oxybutynin 5mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
Medications started on recent admission
- Amoxicillin 500mg capsules: one capsule three times a day - course complete
- Trimethoprim 200mg tablets: one tablet twice a day - course complete
- Risperidone 500 microgram tablets: one tablet twice a day
Medications stopped on recent admission
- Amlodipine 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Daughter temporarily moved in to support her following hospital discharge
- Walking more slowly. Sleepy - seems slower cognitively. Some confusion especially later in the day
- Eating less than normal
- Managing to wash and dress but needing some assistance
- No issues with continence but taking longer to get to the toilet
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 3 (managing well)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Would like to get back to previous level of independence
- Concerned by recent drop in function
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- BP 176/84mmHg
- Pulse 80bpm
- Weight 52kg (58kg one year ago), Height 152cm, BMI 21.6kg/m2
- Urea and Electrolytes within normal range
- FBC normal at time of hospital discharge
- HbA1c 58mmol/mol (7.5%) on last check nine months ago
Most recent relevant consultations
- No consultations in the last year prior to admission
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Antipsychotic prescribing for delirium needs to be for the lowest possible dose, for the shortest possible time. Adults discharged from hospital on antipsychotics need follow up to ensure they are withdrawn. Clear direction should be provided in the discharge plan
- If medication is stopped in hospital, a rationale should be included for when to restart
- Clear indications are needed for all prescribed medications
- Attention is needed to the overall sedative burden of prescribed medication
- Hospital discharge is an important trigger for medication review
- Ensure appropriate local community teams are aware if care or rehabilitation needs are identified
- Consider undiagnosed health conditions if not improving
9.20 Case study: Antibiotics - penicillin allergy de-labelling
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 85-year-old female, retired office worker who lives alone
- Usually manages at home with support from family for meals, shopping and housework
History of presentation/reason for review
- Admitted to hospital after being found by family member on the bathroom floor having fallen overnight
- Spiking temperatures, complaining of back pain, dysuria, urinary frequency and new urinary incontinence. Has signs and symptoms of heart failure including increasing shortness of breath and ankle swelling
- Family say she is more confused than usual, resisting help to get into the ambulance, resisting offers of food and fluid
- Single dose of gentamicin given empirically on the day of admission for a working diagnosis of upper urinary tract infection
- After receiving the dose, she removed the intravenous cannula and resisted attempts to re-site the cannula, therefore oral treatment considered
- MSU result showed multiple antibiotic resistance and so treatment with oral penicillin was considered.
- The nature of penicillin allergy was discussed with the individual and her family. According to GP records and next of kin penicillin “allergy” was nausea and diarrhoea more than 20 years ago during a course of amoxicillin for a chest infection. No reported rash or need for hospitalisation. At the time, she finished the course, and the GP documented the allergy
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (ECHO within the last year)
- Mild Alzheimer’s dementia (MMSE 23/30) – 4 years ago
- COPD – 12 years ago
- Generalised osteoarthritis – 27 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional and herbal remedies)
Allergies: Penicillin
Current medications:
- Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Donepezil 5mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Furosemide 20mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Lisinopril 5mg tablets: one tablet in the morning
- Macrogol 3350 sachets: one sachet twice daily
- Paracetamol 500mg caplets: two caplets four times daily
- Salbutamol 200 microgram dry powder inhaler: one inhalation when required for shortness of breath/ wheeze
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Trelegy Ellipta® (fluticasone 92 micrograms/ vilanterol 22 micrograms/ umeclidinium 65 micrograms) dry powder inhaler, one inhalation in the morning
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- The family feel that medication is not being taken regularly, boxes of tablets and inhalers are often found around the house
- Ex-smoker, 10 pack years, stopped 20 years ago
- Alcohol occasionally at celebratory events
- Walks for about a mile most days with a friend or family member
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 5 (living with mild frailty)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- She has always expressed a wish to maintain independence as long as possible. Currently has delirium
- Family wish to support her at home for as long as possible with a focus for medication on symptom relief
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Weight 47kg, Height 158cm, BMI 18kg/m2
- BP 108/56 mmHg, pulse 68bpm regular, oxygen saturation 96% on air, respiration rate normal
- Noted to have reduced mobility and marked pitting oedema to both knees
- Urea and Electrolytes
- Potassium 5.2mmol/L (3.5-5.3mmol/L)
- Sodium 138mmol/L (133-146mmol/L)
- Urea 8.6mmol/L (2.5-7.8mmol/L)
- WBC 12.9x109/L (4.0-10.0x109/L).
- CRP 72mg/L (0-10mg/L)
- ECG: sinus rhythm, heart rate 72bpm
- Urine culture: sample sent by GP and results available the day after admission
- Organism: Escherichia coli
- Organism Growth 105 orgs/ml
- Sensitive to amoxicillin, gentamicin, aztreonam
- Resistant to trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin
Creatinine 110micromol/L (60-120micromol/L), Calculated creatinine clearance 25 mL/min
Most recent relevant consultations
- Recent dietetic advice provided regarding high nutrient density food to encourage weight gain and family have been incorporating that into meals
- Whilst in hospital:
- Lisinopril withheld on admission due to low blood pressure
- Atorvastatin withheld on admission due to lack of indication
- Furosemide continued due to oedema and increased shortness of breath
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Penicillin challenge can only be undertaken if there is a clear documented assessment of risk.253
- There must be careful assessment of the nature of the “allergy” which includes associated symptoms and the timing of the reaction. Explain the purpose of the penicillin challenge to the person. Following successful oral challenge, it is essential to communicate the implications to the individual and family, and to the GP for the allergy label to be removed from medical records
- Penicillin challenge would ideally be done on an elective basis, through an allergy clinic or similar setting. However, at present such clinics are not available in every area. In practice it may be appropriate to undertake penicillin challenge opportunistically in an acute setting for an individual who is clinically stable253
- Advice on management of UTI in people over 65 is available[319]
- Nitrofurantoin is not excreted in urine in renal impairment, and therefore a caution in use if eGFR<45ml/min. Short courses (three to seven days may be considered at eGFR 30- 44ml/min)[320]
- For older women with low body weight, calculated creatinine clearance is often markedly reduced with only moderately increased serum creatinine
- Inhaler choice and technique: dry powder inhaler (DPI) versus metered dose inhaler (MDI). Ensure the person understands the action (the lack of feeling of a dose being administered) of the DPI. MDI may be more helpful with a spacer/mask for some people, however there is a need to balance this against the environmental effect. The least sustainable drug is the one that is not taken
- Inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in COPD is possible where a person has fewer than two exacerbations per year and no raised eosinophils
- Differentiating breathlessness from heart failure and COPD. The individual had not been taking furosemide regularly prior to admission and oedema and breathlessness improved when this was taken in hospital
9.21 Case study: Antibiotics in end-of-life care
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 79-year-old male
- Nursing home resident currently admitted to hospital
History of presentation/reason for review
- One week ago: worsening cough, shortness of breath and acute confusion
- Deterioration over last three days and now on day four of five-day course of doxycycline for presumed pneumonia
- Last 24 hours: difficulty swallowing, drowsy and too unwell to discuss treatment approach. Discussion with son and admitted to hospital for treatment of suspected pneumonia and dehydration
- Oral candidiasis
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Non-small cell lung cancer with bone, liver and adrenal metastases diagnosed three months ago. For symptomatic management as not fit for chemotherapy
- Parkinson’s disease (PD) – 10 years ago
- Chronic kidney disease – 14 years ago
- Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and hypertension – 18 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drugs reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Amlodipine 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Aspirin 75mg dispersible tablets: one tablet daily
- Co-beneldopa 100/25mg capsules: one capsule every six hours
- Macrogol 3350 sachets: one sachet twice daily
- Paracetamol 500mg caplets: two caplets every six hours
- Quinine sulfate 200mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Simvastatin 40mg tablets: one tablet at night
- Thiamine 100mg tablets: one tablet three times daily
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Clinical frailty score (Rockwood) seven (severely frail)
- Previous alcohol excess, has been abstinent for five years
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Community DNACPR order
- Advance Care Plan in place, listing care home as preferred place of death with ‘consider hospital admission for reversible conditions’
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- New confusion – abbreviated mental test (AMT) 0/4
- Weight 52kg, Height 167cm, BMI 18.6kg/m2
- BP 100/55mmHg, pulse 110bpm
- Respiratory rate 26 per minute; coarse bilateral crepitations on auscultation
- Temperature 35.5°C
- Urea and Electrolytes:
- Urea 22.0mmol/L (2.5-7.8mmol/L)
- eGFR 33 ml/min/1.73m2
- Creatinine 180micromol/L, (60-120micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance 21ml/min
- Albumin 15g/dL (3-50g/dL)
- CRP 75mg/L (0-10mg/L)
- Adjusted calcium 3.21mmol/L (2.20 -2.60mmol/L)
Most recent relevant consultations
Following admission to hospital:
- Intravenous (IV) antibiotics and fluids commenced for treatment of community acquired pneumonia and IV pamidronate for hypercalcaemia of malignancy
- Visibly worsening despite 24 hours of IV treatment
- Agitated and pulling out vascular devices
- Incontinent of loose stools (sample sent for clostridium difficile (C. diff))
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
Anticipatory care plan in place includes desire for
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Recognising “end of life” is critical and transitioning care to palliation is often complex and emotive. It is important to keep a clear focus on overall goals when considering the likely efficacy of any intervention balanced by any burdens associated with treatment. This can be difficult in emergency presentations. Discussion of the management of sudden decline should ideally have been discussed previously to avoid adding to distress by requiring difficult decisions to be made in a short time frame
- Ensure the individual has access to appropriate anticipatory/just in case medications (see Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines)169 N.B. Avoid use of levomepromazine, haloperidol, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide in Parkinson’s disease without specialist advice
- Focus on symptom control with guidance from specialist palliative care team when required
- In this case the individual may not achieve their preferred place of death due to management of this decline as a reversible emergency
- Importance of setting realistic treatment goals before a crisis point
- Importance of review of efficacy and burden of interventions if commenced
- Antibiotic prescribing at end of life should be reviewed regularly and only be given or continued if likely to achieve therapeutic objectives specific to the individual (see SAPG good practice recommendations for use of antibiotics towards the end of life)
- Parkinson’s disease at end of life normally requires specialist input. For example, switching to rotigotine patches from oral formulations. Advice on switching should be obtained from local guidelines and/or OPTIMAL calculator approved by British Geriatric Society and can give advice pending specialist review. Note that rotigotine dose is reduced in adults who are confused or affected by delirium
9.22 Case study: Medication Sick Day Guidance (in nursing home resident)
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 83-year-old male
- Nursing home resident
- Registered blind
History of presentation/reason for review
- Nausea and vomiting (twice two nights ago, and once the following morning)
- Dapagliflozin, furosemide, macrogol, metformin, ramipril and senna suspended until 48 hours after nausea and vomiting resolved. Staff asked for advice from Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) before suspending. ANP advised them to follow sick day guidance and in addition withhold laxative therapy.
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Ankle oedema – 5 months ago
- Depression – 4 years ago
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia – 7 years ago
- Ischaemic heart disease – 12 years ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus – 18 years ago
- Hypertension – 18 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
Current medications:
- Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Co-codamol 30mg/500mg tablets: one or two tablets up to four times a day
- Dapagliflozin 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Finasteride 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Furosemide 40mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lansoprazole 30mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Macrogol 3350 sachets: one or two sachets daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: one tablet twice daily
- Mirtazapine 30mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Ramipril 10mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: one or two tablets at night
- Tamsulosin 400 micrograms modified-release capsules: one capsule daily
- Prescribed prochlorperazine for duration of the acute illness of nausea and vomiting
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Does not smoke or drink alcohol
- Eats a normal diet and fluids
- Requires help of one staff member for personal care, washing and dressing
- Mobility - able to transfer using a walking aid and two staff. Wheelchair for longer distances
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 6 (moderately frail)
- Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 20, referred to Older Adult Community Mental Health Team (OA CMHT)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Individual understood why medication was withheld as had been counselled on sick day guidance at previous medication review
- Wants to ensure that his medication is restarted as soon as possible where appropriate
Observations, examinations and results Note: local laboratory ranges may vary
Blood results from three months ago:
- Weight 87kg, Height 173cm, BMI 29kg/m2
- BP 145/85mmHg, pulse 65bpm
- Urea and Electrolytes:
- Potassium 4.0mmol/L (3.5-5.3mmol/L)
- Sodium 140mmol/L (133-146mmol/L)
- Urea 7.5mmol/L (2.5-7.8mmol/L)
- Creatinine 70micromol/L, eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73m2, calculated creatinine clearance 87ml/min
- HbA1c 53mmol/mol (7.0%)
- Cholesterol 4.8mmol/L (<5.0mmol/L)
Most recent relevant consultations
- With the nursing home staff, they have created his personalised medicines list in the Polypharmacy: Manage Medicines website/app
- Family/welfare power of attorney (POA) informed
- Commenced on a fluid intake and output chart for monitoring
- No further nausea or vomiting since yesterday morning
- Restarted the temporarily withheld medicines
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Implementation of Medication Sick Day Guidance
- Fluid intake and output monitoring during potentially dehydrating illness
- Restarting medicines following sick days according to Medication Sick Day Guidance
- Review of medicines following acute illness is an opportunity to complete full review of long-term conditions and medicines
9.23 Case study: Osteoporosis and risk of falls
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 81-year-old female
- Retired shop assistant
- Lives alone (widowed 12 years ago)
- Has largely been independent, driving until two years ago
- Rarely leaves the house unless accompanied due to her fear of falls
History of presentation/reason for review
- Falls clinic review after recent fall in kitchen at home (with no fractures)
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Further falls around the home with no fractures
- Non-valvular atrial fibrillation – seven years ago
- Fractured wrist after fall on ice - eight years ago
- Osteoporosis – 11 years ago
- COPD – 15 years ago
- Osteoarthritis (OA) – 16 years ago
- Hypertension – 24 years ago
- Dyspepsia – 24 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): nil
Currently prescribed:
- Alendronic acid 70mg tablets: one tablet weekly
- Anoro Ellipta® dry powder inhaler (DPI): one dose each morning
- Atorvastatin 40mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Calcium 1.5g and vitamin D 400iu chewable tablets: two tablets daily
- Diclofenac gel: apply as needed
- Indapamide 2.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Lansoprazole 15mg capsule: one capsule daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: take two tablets when required for pain
- Peptac® liquid: 20ml twice daily
- Ramipril 10mg tablet: one tablet daily
- Salbutamol metered dose inhaler (MDI) 100 micrograms: two puffs when required for breathlessness
- Warfarin tablets 1mg tablets: three tablets daily (target INR 2.5)
- Zopiclone 7.5mg tablet: one tablet at night
Over the counter medicines: Devil’s claw herbal remedy
Lifestyle and current function
- Previously very fit and independent (golfing) and likes to do chair-based exercises daily (watching online)
- Mobile around the house using a walking frame
- Used to cook regularly but now relies on deliveries of ready-made meals
- Gave up smoking 22 years ago (40 pack-year smoking history)
- Drinks alcohol occasionally
- Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 5 (mildly frail)
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Wants to stay at home and live independently for as long as possible without falls or pain
- Doesn’t find the diclofenac gel useful but is unsure what else she could use for sore knees after falling
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory ranges may vary
- Weight 44.9kg, Height 152cm, BMI 19kg/m2
- BP 130/72mmHg, no postural change
- Urea and Electrolytes within normal range
- Creatinine 77micromol/L (60-120micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance 36ml/min
- FBC within normal range
- INR: 2.5 (target 2.0-3.0)
- HbA1c 54mmol/mol (7.1%)
- Cholesterol 4.9mmol/L (<5.0mmol/L)
- LFTs within normal range
- TSH within normal range
- DXA (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan T-score of –2.5 spine and –3 hip (11 years ago)
- QFracture score 36.2
Most recent relevant consultations
- The Advanced Nurse Practitioner visited last week to check urea and electrolytes and blood pressure after recent fall - all observations and results were within normal range
- An occupational therapist has assessed her living accommodation and there are rails, a raised toilet seat and the walking frame is suitable
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Reducing falls risk due to medication and other adverse effects
- Review bisphosphonate treatment duration (risk versus benefit). Benefit of bisphosphonates continues for a period once stopped. After treatment pause (bisphosphonate holiday), review including an assessment of frailty and life expectancy. If benefit still a realistic prospect, consider restarting bisphosphonate. Parenteral bisphosphonate treatment would have less impact with other medication and comorbidities (dyspepsia) or consider denosumab
- Consider warfarin safety in an individual with falls risk
- Adherence to therapy with polypharmacy and reducing medication burden where appropriate
- Highlight the need to review all medication including herbal and OTC medicines
- Sustainability considerations: diclofenac gel and inhaler choices
9.24 Case Study: Palliative Care (Cardiovascular)
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 66-year-old female
- Retired nurse
- Lives at home alone
- Husband died 18 months ago due to cerebrovascular accident. Two supportive daughters live locally
History of presentation/reason for review
- Referred to palliative care team due to general deterioration, uncontrolled pain and constipation
- Poor oral intake
- Dry, painful mouth
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (brain, liver and bone metastases) - diagnosed three months ago
- Depression – 18 months ago
- Urge incontinence – 2 years ago
- Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation – 3 years ago
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – 6 years ago
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus – 12 years ago
- Hypertension – 13 years ago
- Hypothyroidism – 41 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Currently prescribed:
- Alogliptin 12.5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Amitriptyline 25mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Atorvastatin 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Dexamethasone 2mg tablets: three tablets daily
- Diazepam 5mg tablets: one tablet three times a day
- Edoxaban 60mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Folic acid 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Levothyroxine 100microgram tablets: two tablets daily
- Lidocaine 700mg plasters: Apply two plasters once daily for 12 hours, followed by a 12-hour plaster-free period
- Macrogol 3350 sachets: one sachet daily
- Metformin 500mg tablets: one twice a day
- Morphine MR 30mg capsules: one capsule twice a day
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times a day
- Pregabalin 300mg capsules: one capsule twice a day
- Ramipril 10mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Senna 7.5mg tablets: two tablets at night
- Sertraline 150mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Solifenacin 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Trelegy Ellipta® 22/92/55 micrograms DPI: one inhalation daily
As required medications:
- Morphine IR 10mg tablets: One every four to six hours as required for pain relief
- Salbutamol 100 micrograms pMDI: two doses as required for breathlessness
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) Performance Status: 2
- Assistance from carers for personal care
- Mobility limited due to pain, discomfort and shortness of breath
- Able to mobilise short distances with walking aid
- Oral intake deteriorating. Managing fluid and limited diet. Mouth sore on swallowing
- Smoker (20 cigarettes per day) and no alcohol
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Good pain control
- Struggling with medicines due to large tablet burden and oral pain
- Would like to spend time with grandchildren
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory ranges may vary
- Weight 85kg, Height 160cm, BMI 33.2kg/m2
- BP 110/60mmHg
- Pulse 65bpm, sinus rhythm
- eGFR: 40mL/minute/1.73 m2
- HbA1c 52mmol/mol (6.9%)
Most recent relevant consultations
- Oncology review - for best supportive care, expected prognosis of months
- Lower respiratory tract infection one month ago, treated with antibiotics in accordance with sputum culture sensitivities
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
Medication sick day guidance:
Dexamethasone: ensure aware of steroid sick day guidance and ensure they have a steroid emergency card |
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Medicine targets need to consider the individual and be appropriate for them, particularly with limited life expectancy
- Although most medicines included have a clear indication, many are no longer indicated due to limited prognosis
- Marked strain on individual with significant medicine burden, which may impact compliance
- Complex blood glucose control due to reduced oral intake and steroid use. Glycaemic targets and antihyperglycemic medicines require review
- Renal impairment has implications for safe prescribing, including the prescribing of opioids
- When multiple medications are changed, consider introducing changes sequentially, accounting for what matters to the individual
- Consider other routes of administration for medications essential for symptom control to reduce tablet burden
- Access the ECOG performance status scale
- If regular steroid administration consider requirements during acute illness see (Society for Endocrinology Steroid Sick Day Rules patient information leaflet)[321]
9.25 Case Study: Palliative Care – End of Life Care
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 53-year-old male
- Warehouse manager (currently unable to work)
- Married with three adult children
History of presentation/reason for review
Referred to local specialist palliative care team by GP for symptom management. Symptoms are poorly controlled, oral route is variable and there is general deterioration in overall condition.
Reasons for review:
- Poor swallow
- Painful mouth (oral thrush)
- Shortness of breath and fatigue
- Constipation, nausea
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Locally advanced oesophageal cancer; lung and bone metastases (diagnosed six months ago, now for Best Supportive Care)
- Anxiety and depression – 4 years ago
- Hypertension – 9 years ago
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus (since childhood)
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions (ADRs): no known drug allergy
Currently prescribed:
- Fentanyl patch 25micrograms/hour patch: one patch to be changed every 72 hours
- Fluconazole 50mg capsules: one capsule daily (started two days ago)
- Fluoxetine 40mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Ibuprofen 400mg tablets: one tablet three times a day
- Insulin detemir 100 unit per 1 ml injection (Levemir®): SC injection twice daily
- Insulin aspart 100 unit per 1ml injection (NovoRapid®): SC injection 15mins before each meal
- Laxido® sachets: one sachet twice daily
- Metoclopramide 10mg tablets: one tablet three times daily
- Omeprazole 20mg capsules: two capsules daily
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times a day
- Ramipril 10mg capsules: one capsule daily
- Zopiclone 7.5mg tablets: one tablet at night
As required medications:
- Morphine sulfate 10mg/5ml oral solution, 10mg (5ml) every four hours if needed for pain relief
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) 20%. Totally bedbound. Nursing care provided by community nurses and family members
- Confusion
- Heavy smoker (previously smoking > 30 cigarettes per day; now struggling to smoke)
- Previous alcohol excess
- Oral intake poor due to difficulty swallowing
- Wife is main carer
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Declined further upper GI endoscopy/stenting
- Does not wish aggressive medical interventions or admission to acute services
- Desire to focus on symptom control
- Preferred place of death hospice
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory ranges may vary
- Unremarkable blood results from two weeks ago (updated bloods not clinically indicated / desired)
- Blood glucose level consistently within acceptable range (6-15mmol/l)
- Breakthrough analgesia requirement. Typically, two or three doses of morphine 10mg PO /24 hours
- Oxygen saturation on room air 85%
- BP 105/55 mm/Hg; Pulse 80bpm Sinus Rhythm; Temp 36.5°C
- General condition - frail, able to speak short sentences, limited by fatigue/breathlessness. Considered to be in the last days of life
Most recent relevant consultations
- Recent single fraction of radiotherapy to L1/L2 for pain control (bone metastases)
- Under care of community specialist palliative care team
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice):
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs:
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives:
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for:
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for:
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
|
|
7. Person-centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider:
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
Ensure patient and /or family/POA (depending on capacity) understand and agree with goals of care Communicate that comfort is paramount as patient is nearing end of life |
Key concepts in this case
- Consider appropriate routes of medicines administration if difficulty swallowing. Conversion of essential medications to liquid/orodispersible formulations, subcutaneous (SC) injections or continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via a syringe pump may be indicated.
- Prescribe medications for administration via SC route in anticipation of need to ensure that medication is available to treat common symptoms experienced in the last days/weeks of life.314
Opioid for pain relief and/or breathlessness
Midazolam for anxiety or agitation or breathlessness
Levomepromazine for nausea and vomiting or agitation
Hyoscine butylbromide for thin, upper respiratory secretions
- Consider non-drug measures for symptom management (e.g. radiotherapy, positioning)
- Insulin should not be stopped in patients with type 1 diabetes. Consider switching to a once daily regime. Minimise interventions and monitoring. Goal is to avoid symptomatic hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia/ketoacidosis.[322]
- Do not switch fentanyl patch to another opioid in a dying patient. Continue the opioid patch and use an additional opioid as required via CSCI.169
- Risk/benefit decisions may alter as patient approaches end of life. The benefit associated with greater comfort often outweighs the potential harm from adverse drug effects. Decisions should be made in partnership with individual / power of attorney (POA).
- Consider nicotine withdrawal as a potential cause of delirium, terminal restlessness, anxiety, insomnia, irritability. Offer nicotine replacement therapy if a heavy smoker is unable to smoke.
- The use of medicines outwith a manufacturer’s licence or ‘off label use’ is common practice in palliative care, for example administration by the SC route, but carries additional responsibilities for prescribers, pharmacists and nurses. Once medications are mixed in a syringe for CSCI administration they become “unlicensed” however, this is considered safe and routine practice provided compatibilities and diluents are checked prior to prescription/administration.315
9.26 Case study: Drug dependency and requests for medication out of hours
Case summary
Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)
- 38-year-old female
- Part-time shop assistant
History of presentation/reason for review
- Contact to out of hours (via NHS 24) on Friday evening. Reports increasing pain, described as ‘tingling and shooting pain down my legs which comes and goes.’ Pain is chronic, more than three years, has not changed in nature, just intensity. No other symptoms which might suggest cord compression or other red flags
- Requesting more gabapentin and tramadol as states that pain is not controlled with current doses, so takes more than prescribed and has run out of medication
Current medical history and relevant comorbidities
- Depression – 7 years ago
- Chronic pain: hip and back – 9 years ago
- Drug dependency – 18 years ago
Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparations, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)
Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil
Currently prescribed:
- Amitriptyline 50mg tablets: two tablets daily
- Bisacodyl 5mg tablets: one or two at night as required
- Co-codamol 30/500mg tablets: two tablets four times daily
- Gabapentin 300mg capsules: one capsule three times daily
- Methadone 1mg/ml oral solution: 30ml daily, twice weekly pick-up
- Pregabalin 150mg capsules: one capsule twice daily
- Sertraline 100mg tablets: one tablet daily
- Tramadol 50mg capsules: one capsule three times daily
Over the counter medicines: nil
Lifestyle and current function
- Single, two grown up daughters who live away from home
- Moved to the area ten months ago due to violent break-up with previous partner
- Alcohol: one bottle of wine most evenings
- Smoker: 30g tobacco weekly
- Occasional street drug use: cannabis at the weekend
- Usually little physical activity. Currently unable to drive, as licence confiscated due to drink-driving, so walking to and from work
“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns, and expectations of treatment)
- Wants to get pain under control
- Frustrated at time taken to get through on phone to have query dealt with by out of hours (OOH)
Observations, examinations and results
Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary
- Urea and electrolytes normal
- Weight 79kg, Height 168cm, BMI 28kg/m2
- No change to bladder or bowel function, no loss of sensation
- Normal MRI scan within the last six months
- No additional information on Emergency Care Summary (ECS)
Most recent relevant consultations
Has frequent contacts with GP practice and out of hours as runs out of medication, which is dispensed weekly, often due to hip and low back pain.
Steps |
Process |
Person specific issues to address |
---|---|---|
1. Aims What matters to the individual about their condition(s)? |
Review diagnoses and consider:
|
|
2. Need Identify essential drug therapy |
Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)
|
|
3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy? |
Identify and review the continued need for drugs
|
|
4. Effectiveness Are therapeutic objectives being achieved? |
Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives
|
|
5. Safety Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the person know what to do if they’re ill? |
Identify individual safety risks by checking for
Identify adverse drug effects by checking for
|
|
6. Sustainability Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable? |
Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by
Consider the environmental impact of
Water pollution |
|
7. Person- centredness Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended? |
Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?
Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider
Agree and communicate plan
|
Agreed plan
|
Key concepts in this case
- Managing regular requests (including out of hours) for pain medication which has potential for abuse
- Special notes around indication for prescribing, planned reduction regimes or suggested management options for early prescription requests can be recorded within the ECS to aid decision making in OOH services
- In daytime GP practice recommend a plan for reducing inappropriate polypharmacy in pain and depression associated with drug dependency and substance use. This is preferable in daytime GP services due to access to full medical records and relational continuity, as this process can be complex and take time. With a clear plan documented on ECS, this will aid other healthcare providers such as out of hours or community pharmacies
- Referral to community link workers and third sector agencies may be helpful to assist a holistic approach to the management of pain and depression with a background of substance use. Gaining acceptance and motivation for this pathway may be challenging
- Varied half-lives for medication (and therefore elimination rates) (see Table 30 below) can be used to help determine if withdrawal effects are likely to be present during the out of hours period
Medication |
Half-life (T1/2) (hours, unless specified) |
Time to almost complete elimination (five half-lives) (hours, unless specified) |
---|---|---|
Amitriptyline |
25 |
125 (5 days) |
Tramadol |
6 |
30 |
Morphine |
1.5-4.5 |
7.5-22.5 |
Gabapentin |
5-7 |
25-35 |
Pregabalin |
6.3 |
31.5 |
9.27 Case studies: Addressing the use of psychoactive medication for people living with dementia through non-pharmacological techniques
Background
The 2017 Care Inspectorate report My Life, My Care Home highlights the standards
set out in the Scottish Government’s Standards of Care for People with Dementia in
Scotland (2011). It states that for people with dementia, if symptoms develop which cause distress or lead to behaviour that challenges, there should be an integrated assessment to establish the cause and a care plan developed.
A range of non-pharmacological interventions are available including evidence-based therapies, such as group based or individual cognitive stimulation, individual reality orientation therapy, art therapy, therapeutic activities and physical exercise.
Non-pharmacological interventions should be used first line to reduce the need for “as required” medication. When psychoactive medication is prescribed for people with dementia the prescriber needs to be satisfied that there is no reasonable alternative. The medication must be reviewed regularly and a plan recorded to make carers and staff aware of any potential side effects and how to report any concerns.
Case studies
HC-One (care home provider) and the Care Inspectorate worked together on a project in eight HC-One Scotland care homes aimed at improving dementia care and reducing the need for psychoactive medication for people living with dementia.
Staff were trained in “finding the why” for stress and distress behaviours and making adaptions to the physical and social environment. In addition, local system changes were tested to improve appropriate prescribing and use of sedating psychoactive medicines.
The project allowed frontline care staff the psychological freedom to test change ideas and data gathered locally was used to drive improvement. The case studies demonstrate change at an individual level and collectively across a care home.
Case Study 1:
Background: A female resident in a care home was struggling to accept twice daily personal care, with a baseline average of two sessions of personal care accepted per week. Desensitising the resident to the bathroom where personal care took place had limited effect. The service tried consistent staff, which had some effect, but gender of care staff had no effect. However, staff identified that height of care staff was a trigger factor for this person.
Change implemented: Staff of similar height to reduce anxiety
Outcomes:
- improved personal care - around 10-12 personal care sessions per week
- a successful reduction (over 50%) of antipsychotic (quetiapine) medication
- resident has also gained 2.25kg, has a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score of 0 and healthy body mass index (BMI), with staff reporting she now sits and enjoys her meal in the dining room, something she would not do before
- reduced staff time dealing with the administrative and challenging effects of the behaviours

Case Study 2:
Background: One staff member identified a resident watching care staff leave through the glass front door as a key trigger for the resident’s stress and distress behaviour.
Change implemented: a frosted covering was applied to the door
Outcomes:
- less stress and distress for the resident
- 60% reduction in use of when required anxiolytics
- weight gain of 1.4kg and now has a MUST score of 0 and healthy BMI
- care staff noted less time dealing with effects of behaviours that challenge, including filling in ABC (Antecedent, Behaviour, Consequence) charts and seeking input from external healthcare professionals.

Case Study 3:
Background: A resident nearing end of life was prescribed and received regular, and when required, psychoactive medicines.
Change implemented: to make her feel safe and reduce her stress, care staff adapted her room to provide a familiar space resembling her own living room, including familiar pictures, throws and cushions. They also purchased a reed diffuser to provide the comforting smell of her husband’s aftershave.
Outcomes:
- the resident was more settled, and her psychoactive medicines were discontinued
- a relative of the resident said: “Mum passed away peacefully, not on any sedative medication. She was able to hold a conversation with us and share memories. I will never be able to thank the staff enough for never giving up and giving my mum a nice death.”
- seeing the outcomes for this resident, staff created a cosy lounge area with a kitchen area and free access to outside space. This allowed a space away from the main lounge that residents could go to if they wanted somewhere quieter
- a reduction across the unit of when required psychoactive medication by 89%

Case Study 4:
Background: The resident initially presented with symptoms that suggested end-of-life. Dementia Care Team determined to ‘find the why’ of the behaviours of distress which increased during sunset, with possible hallucinations caused by shadows in their room. The resident also felt threatened by people following them or sitting outside their room.
Change implemented:
- as believed to be at end-of-life regular antipsychotic doses reduced and stopped
- a blind was fitted to the person’s room to reduce shadows and therefore hallucinations
- a door alarm linked to the nurse call system was implemented so that the person could have private time in their room
- an activity plan tailored to the resident’s interest (gardening) started
Outcomes:
- environmental measures resulted in a reduction in stress and distress incidents
- sedating psychoactive medicines were withdrawn and the resident re-engaged with the environment. However stress and distress increased to a level that the resident was served notice to leave the home
- psychoactive medicines were re-started but at a lower dose to allow resident to remain in the home
- the resident now runs a gardening club in the care home, are now mobilising and independent with personal care and eating

Case Study 5:
Background: A resident was admitted to a care home with an expectation from social work that the placement would fail due to her ‘behaviours of concern’, with long-term hospital care the next stage. The staff recognised there was no activity provided for the resident in order to provide a meaningful day.
Change implemented:
They found things she liked to do and included these in tailored activity plans, along with opportunities for independent activity through ‘life stations’. A life station is an area designed to evoke familiarity and comfort for residents with dementia. These stations reflect aspects of their past life, such as hobbies, careers, or routines. This included her supporting staff with folding towels and matching socks, organising the dressing table life station and supporting the wellbeing staff to set up activity trolleys, dining tables and organise cupboards throughout the day.
Outcomes:
- a complete reduction in stress and distress incidents
- no use of when required anxiolytic use in the last four months of the project, and a 25% reduction in the regular risperidone dose
- the placement in the home was a success
- the staff approach of “It’s never too late, you must always seek the why” gave this resident the opportunity to live their dementia journey in a homely environment.
Case Study 6:
Background: One home worked closely with their GP to agree a process for re-starting (post COVID) three monthly reviews of psychoactive medicines. 11 residents were prescribed psychoactive medications at the start of the project.
Change implemented:
GP reviews and staff training (from the dementia care team) with regular reviews
Outcomes:
- Eight now had a psychoactive medication review by the end of project:
- five have an active reduction plan in place
- two have had risperidone discontinued
- one had lorazepam discontinued
- an overall reduction in the level of when required psychoactive medicines used
- Note: The increase in use of psychoactive medication later in the project was driven primarily by staff who were less familiar with residents, using medicines as a first line option for management of stress and distress
- therefore, further change implemented when using staff who were unfamiliar with residents, the home’s approach to medication use was shared at the daily flash meetings

Case Study 7:
Background: A home recognised that current reviews by prescribers were ineffective because staff did not have the relevant information to hand when clinical discussions took place.
Change implemented:
Staff develop a form containing the necessary information pre-review, such as how often when required medicines are used, the number of distress incidents, resident presentation etc, to make reviews meaningful. The form was developed using a quality improvement approach of rapid change cycles, with different staff members inputting at each cycle.
Outcomes:
- by the end of the project the home were on version four of the form
- five residents have had a review with reduction plan in place, and two residents have had psychoactive medication discontinued.
- feedback on the form was positive:
- “As a new nurse this form gave me the confidence that I could have the discussion to reduce medication, prompted me to have all the information I needed ahead of time, ready to present and discuss with the prescribing practitioner”. (Staff Nurse)
- “It encouraged the process and benefit is not using medication.” (Consultant Psychiatrist)
- A relative of one of the residents noted the benefits of reduced use of medicine. “My wife has had her risperidone and trazodone medication stopped since moving into the care home and staff working closely with her. I feel my wife has a better quality of life and she is now able to understand some of what is being said and is now managing to do things for herself that she couldn’t do before when at home.”
Case Study 8:
Background: A couple of homes wanted to tackle the issue of staff using when required psychoactive medication as a first approach rather than a last resort for behaviours that challenge. A psychological safe space was essential so staff could be honest about administration practices and ways to change this without fear of judgement.
Change implemented:
The homes tested implementing ABC charts with peer review to show what steps were tried before administration of ‘when required’ psychoactive medication. Training and support were given to staff, so they knew what to document on the charts, how to review behaviours, “find the why” and implement strategies to support residents rather than use psychoactive medicines. The idea of the peer review was in case a second person could suggest anything that hadn’t been tried. This gave staff the confidence that when medication was felt necessary that they had explored all non-pharmacological interventions and could evidence as such.
Outcomes:
- the results in both homes were a reduction in when required psychoactive medication use (Chart 16 and Chart 17).
- in the first home (Chart 16) the change idea was tested on one resident:
- when required quetiapine being discontinued, along with a reduction in regular risperidone
- reduction in falls and better quality of life during their last three months
- in the second home (Chart 17) there was a 65% reduction in ‘when required’ psychoactive medication administration. This included a period of disruption caused by opening up/merging of units in the home.


Contact
Email: EPandT@gov.scot