Heat and Energy Efficiency Technical Suitability Assessment: consultation analysis

Q6 Skills and Qualifications required to undertake a HEETSA

60 respondents provided answers to Q6, many making multiple comments. Half of the comments proposed existing skills, training and qualifications that could be used where relevant. Of the remaining comments, three-quarters identified skill gaps. The residual comments were split equally between suggesting specific training that is needed and more general comments.

Existing Skills and Training

There was a recognition that there is an existing pool of potential HEETSA assessors. Many possess relevant skills and experience, which can be built upon which are referenced here. There was little appetite for the creation of an entirely new discipline.

Some respondents referenced the need to have one or more existing professional qualifications. Of these there was an overlap between referencing the need for professional qualifications in general and stating specific qualifications needed including building surveying, architecture, architectural technology or engineering.

Some respondents also referenced existing training that could be used. This included specific training such as PAS 2035, domestic energy assessment, Passivhaus EnerPhit, MCS accreditation or AECB assessment. There was also reference to more generalised training including in building physics, energy modelling software, risk assessment, and thermographic and moisture surveying.

Skill Gaps

Few respondents felt that there was a pre-existing qualification which, by itself, was sufficient. However, many existing qualifications and skilled professionals could undertake HEETSA Assessments with some top-up training. Some respondents specifically considered that necessary upskilling was deliverable through CPD and other training.

Some respondents provided feedback on training needs. Examples included: new low-carbon technologies, building pathology (particularly traditional buildings), occupancy and household profiling, heritage retro-fit, traditional building materials and methodologies and finally, ventilation systems.

Importantly, respondents highlighted that different buildings may require different skills. In particular, specialist knowledge is needed for traditional buildings and emerging new technologies. Hence, the necessary upskilling depended on the building being assessed.

New Training Opportunities

Some respondents highlighted new training opportunities.

• HEETSA qualification: In due course, a specific HEETSA qualification should be considered.
• Product training: There is a need for specific product training. Particularly regarding new technologies and heating systems.
• BS 40104: BS 40104 might form a framework for further training.

General Comments

In addition, a few respondents provided each of the following comments.

• HEETSA advocate: There is a need for an advocate to support homeowners in navigating the HEETSA process.
• Building visit and independence: HEETSA cannot be a desktop assessment and must be independently carried out.
• Building Performance Evaluation (BPE): Building performance evaluation should be included as a final stage of HEETSA to validate results.
• Communication: It is the responsibility of HEETSA assessors to communicate the assessment results effectively to building owners and occupants.