Heat and Energy Efficiency Technical Suitability Assessment: consultation analysis

Q13 Developing a Legal Basis for a HEETSA

Of the 56 respondents that answered this question, most thought it necessary to develop a legal basis for HEETSA (n=44). Only 12 respondents thought it is not necessary to develop a legal basis.

Organisations were more likely than individuals to respond that it is necessary to develop a legal basis for HEETSA.

Reasons for supporting

The most cited reason for supporting a legal basis was that this would ensure that the HEETSA assessor is held accountable for their work. This safeguards the consumer. A similar number of respondents considered that it should also help ensure the delivery of a consistent and quality service. For example, a legal framework would ensure that assessors are adequately accredited and trained. It was felt that a legal basis would enable enforcement and monitoring of implementation.

More generally, some respondents thought a legal basis for HEETSA would increase its legitimacy and uptake. This could improve market confidence in HEETSA.

Some respondents noted that a legal framework would be required to support integration with other regulation, including PRS MEES.

Reasons for opposing

One reason for opposing was the time, resource and cost of developing the legal basis. Some suggested a flexible approach to mitigate this. For example, a phased introduction could enable early uptake while a legal basis is developed. Others suggested that imposing HEETSA through regulation could limit market innovation and collaboration.

Other considerations and suggestions

• Duplication: Some respondents noted that overlap with existing regulations should be considered to avoid duplication.
• Not mandating HEETSA: A few respondents noted that the legal basis should not make HEETSA obligatory. It was also suggested implementing recommendations should be a choice not a requirement.