Scottish Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer 2025
The Scottish Referral Guidelines (SRGs) for Suspected Cancer support primary care clinicians in identifying patients who are most likely to have cancer and therefore require urgent assessment by a specialist.
Purpose and development of the Guidelines
Purpose of the Guidelines
These Guidelines support delivery of the Cancer Strategy for Scotland’s earlier diagnosis vision. Reducing the number of later stage (3 or 4) diagnoses will improve cancer survival and patient outcomes.
These Guidelines have been developed to support healthcare professionals to identify and refer people with symptoms suspicious of cancer. The Guidelines will also aid secondary care clinicians in vetting referrals to ensure people with symptoms suspicious of cancer are prioritised for further assessment. In addition, they describe the impact that socio-economic and health inequalities can have on cancer referrals. The Guidelines will also help healthcare professionals to identify those who are unlikely to have cancer and may be managed or referred through other pathways.
Development of the Guidelines
The Scottish Referral Guidelines (SRGs) for Suspected Cancer were first published in 2002 and subsequently revised in 2007, 2014, and 2019. In 2023, the Scottish Government commissioned the Centre for Sustainable Delivery (CfSD) to conduct a full clinical review and update of the SRGs according to current evidence and clinical consensus.
CfSD commissioned Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) and Cancer Research UK (CRUK) to undertake a review of current international cancer referral guidelines and emerging evidence for each tumour group. Relevant demographic data was also obtained from Scottish Government and Public Health Scotland (PHS). A Project Team and Steering Group were established to oversee the clinical review process (see Appendices 1 & 2).
In the context of urgent suspicion of cancer (USC) referrals, a positive predictive value (PPV) describes the chance of a person having cancer when they present with defined clinical features. The prior SRGs used a threshold of equal to or above 3% (≥3%). This meant that a person should be referred for urgent assessment if there was a 3% (or greater) chance of their clinical features being due to cancer. It was accepted that PPV data was not available for all cancer types.
HIS and CRUK were commissioned to review the suitability of reducing the PPV below 3% for this Guideline review. Published data showed that decreasing this threshold would increase referrals (e.g. change from 3% to 2% would increase referrals by 8%) but could detect a small proportion (<5%) of cancers in the year preceding development of more significant clinical features (i.e. those exceeding the 3% threshold)[8],[9]. The effect was not the same for all cancer types[8],[9]. Considering this modest effect on cancer detection and the current pressures on diagnostic services, the Steering Group decided to keep the current Guideline’s PPV threshold at equal to or greater than 3%. This threshold is in line with other cancer referral guidelines including National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Peer review sessions (PRSs) were held for each of the tumour groups. A session was also held to create a new guideline on assessing and referring people with non-specific symptoms of cancer. As national guidelines on Malignant Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) had been produced recently, the Steering Group decided not to hold a PRS specifically for MSCC and it has not been included in the Guidelines.
Scotland’s three Regional Cancer Networks were approached to nominate at least 3 representatives for each session, who were responsible for liaising with their respective tumour groups both ahead of the sessions and on the draft produced. The SPCCG was approached to identify Health Board GP Cancer Leads for each session, with a minimum of two in attendance at each PRS. HIS also identified a public partner to attend each PRS who was responsible for representing the public/patient perspective. There were also attendees who had participated in the previous SRG review - for a full list of attendees see Appendix 3. This process ensured geographic balance in representation.
Demographic data alongside the findings of the evidence reviews undertaken by HIS and CRUK were presented at each PRS. Decisions on the content of the new Guidelines were made based on evidence and clinical consensus. Where national guidelines were in place or being revised, effort was made to ensure consistency between these and the refreshed SRGs. CfSD has published several directly relevant pathways and guidelines to date - references and links to these have been included throughout the refreshed SRGs.
Decision logs for each PRS were produced to keep a record of all changes made. Attendees identified, reviewed, and systematically considered differences in recommendations based on their expert clinical knowledge and practical experience, while considering the Scottish context.
Following the 14 PRSs, a Task and Finish Sub-group of the Steering Group was established to take the SRGs from updated drafts to a finalised version, ready for publication (see Appendix 4). This group aimed to ensure that the language and formatting was clear and consistent throughout.
A 6-week wider stakeholder engagement phase then commenced, beyond those who had participated in a PRS. This helped ensure that the draft Guidelines were well populated across NHS Scotland and had the consensus needed to be effectively implemented at the point of publication.
Terminology used throughout the Guidelines
Throughout the SRGs ‘woman/women’ refers to the biological sex of a person born female and the term ‘man/male’ refers to the biological sex of a person born male, as defined by the Equality Act 2010.
It may be necessary to widen the definition for certain cancer types to account for anatomical considerations that would be applicable to a transgender woman or transgender man.
The reason for this is that the risk of a particular cancer type relates to biological sex and the effects of gender reassignment treatment. For example, transgender individuals are reported to have a higher risk of breast cancer compared to men, but a lower risk compared to women[10].
Where anatomical considerations or gender reassignment are relevant, this has been highlighted in the individual clinical guidelines.
Under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, the term ‘child’ refers to anyone under the age of 18. However, for the purpose of the Children and Young People Cancer Guideline, a ‘child’ refers to someone between the ages of 0 and 14, and a ‘young person’ between the ages of 15 and 24.
Throughout the Guidelines ‘people of colour’ are referred to where clinically relevant, such as in the Skin Cancers Guideline. This term refers to diverse skin colours and includes people of African, Asian, Latino, Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and Native American descent.
Equality Impact Assessment (EQIA)
The Scottish Government and NHS Scotland are committed to embedding the principles of equality, diversity and inclusion, and protecting the human rights of everybody in Scotland with respect to the nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation. Throughout the SRG review process, consideration was also given to how the updated Guidelines would impact those with carer status and those from a lower socio-economic background.
An equality impact assessment (EQIA) was used throughout the development process. At the end of each PRS the nine protected characteristics were reviewed and attendees were asked to consider any impact on changes made to the Guidelines. The purpose of this was to ensure that there were no unintended consequences for any of the protected groups.
Dissemination of the Guidelines
The Guidelines will be made available to all healthcare professionals to whom someone may first present with symptoms of a possible cancer. This includes GPs, Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) and other nursing staff, Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), pharmacists, dentists, optometrists, NHS24, paramedics and Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments. The Guidelines will also be brought to the attention of secondary care clinicians of all grades to encourage equal access to investigation and to facilitate interdepartmental referrals.
The Guidelines will be actively disseminated through a number of key stakeholders including Regional Cancer Network, SPCCG, NHS Cancer Managers, Royal Colleges, Scottish Government Primary Care Directorate, Directors of Pharmacy, Chief Operating Officer for NHS Scotland and through CfSD Board Champions. The delivery of a robust communications plan will support broad dissemination across all relevant groups, networks and stakeholders across NHS Scotland.
Future refreshes
The SRGs will be reviewed every three years although they may be subject to update before this period should new clinical evidence emerge. Timings will be considered with the SPCCG and CfSD’s Primary and Secondary Care Interface Group (PCSCI).
Monitoring effectiveness
USC referrals, and associated conversion and detection data, collected by Public Health Scotland (PHS), will be reviewed. In addition, it is recommended that NHS Boards conduct audits on the use of the Guidelines and any regrading or Active Clinical Referral Triage (ACRT) trends, at least every year, to ensure effectiveness.
Contact
Email: cfsdcancerandedteam@nhs.scot