Community sentencing options for people with substance use problems: review findings summary

Summary findings from review of community sentencing options for people with substance use problems.


Footnotes

1. Substantial practical, legal and ethical challenges make it very rare for studies in this space to utilise the most rigorous methodologies like randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or robust quasi-experimental or matching approaches, meaning that researchers seldom have access to a meaningful comparator group that would allow them to confidently attribute impact.

2. It is organised based on Wallace's (2019) "Recommended Menu of Evidence Based Addiction Treatment" from the leading textbook on mandated drug dependency treatment, supplemented with evidence from the wider literature on addressing people's complex needs in this setting.

3. These acronyms refer, respectively, to Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous and Crystal Meth Anonymous

4. See, for example, the Identity Theory of Desistance (ITD) (Patenoster and Bushway, 2009), the Social Identity Model of Cessation Maintenance (SIMCM), the Social Identity Model of Recovery (SIMOR), and Social Identity Model of Transition (SIMT)(Frings and Albery, 2015; Best et al, 2016; Kay and Monaghan, 2018).

5. These acronyms refer, respectively, to Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous and Crystal Meth Anonymous

6. See, for example, the literature canvassed in International Approaches to Drug Law Reform (Scottish Government, 2021): International approaches to drug law reform: research - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

Contact

Email: socialresearch@gov.scot

Back to top