Charity regulation review: consultation analysis
Consultation analysis report on the Review of Charity Regulation consultation. This consultation ran from 29 April to 22 July 2024.
Appendix A: Quantitative analysis
The consultation included 9 closed questions which asked respondents for their views on the possible approaches set out in the consultation paper. This appendix details the responses to these questions.
Not all respondents answered every question. However, where those who did not answer the closed questions expressed a view in their open comments, this has been noted in the qualitative analysis.
To allow comparisons across sub-groups, the tables in this report and appendix present the results of the closed questions based on those who answered each question.
For clarity, each table shows:
- The percentage of respondents from the total sample of 163 respondents who selected each response (grey row).
- The percentage of respondents among those who answered each question, broken down by individual and organisation responses and by type of organisation (rows including and under “All answering”.
- The sample size column notes how many respondents within each audience answered each question.
Please note that the row percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.
Q1. Should there be a review of charity regulation?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 80 | 8 | 9 | 4 |
| All answering | 157 | 83 | 8 | 9 | - |
| Individuals | 82 | 80 | 11 | 9 | - |
| Organisations: | 75 | 85 | 5 | 9 | - |
|
46 | 83 | 7 | 11 | - |
|
16 | 88 | 0 | 13 | - |
|
11 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q3. If a review of charity regulation is undertaken, which of the following should be the purpose of the review (choose one):
Option 1: To assess the effectiveness of current charity regulation in meeting the future needs of the sector.
Option 2: To review the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 - exploring if the Act is doing what it set out to do and if any changes are required.
Other – please specify.
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Option 1 | % Option 2 | % Don’t know | % Other | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 51 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 5 |
| All answering | 155 | 54 | 28 | 12 | 6 | - |
| Individuals | 82 | 56 | 30 | 10 | 4 | - |
| Organisations: | 73 | 51 | 25 | 15 | 10 | - |
|
46 | 37 | 37 | 13 | 13 | - |
|
15 | 80 | 7 | 7 | 7 | - |
|
11 | 64 | 0 | 36 | 0 | - |
|
1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q4. Do you think you or your organisation will have capacity to contribute views to a review process in the next 12 months?
Yes / No / Don’t know
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 67 | 9 | 20 | 3 |
| All answering | 158 | 70 | 9 | 21 | - |
| Individuals | 83 | 64 | 13 | 23 | - |
| Organisations: | 75 | 76 | 5 | 19 | - |
|
46 | 74 | 4 | 22 | - |
|
16 | 88 | 0 | 13 | - |
|
11 | 82 | 0 | 18 | - |
|
2 | 0 | 100 | 0 | - |
Q7A. Charitable purposes: Should this aspect of charity regulation be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 51 | 33 | 12 | 5 |
| All answering | 155 | 54 | 34 | 12 | - |
| Individuals | 83 | 58 | 35 | 7 | - |
| Organisations: | 72 | 49 | 33 | 18 | - |
|
46 | 43 | 35 | 22 | - |
|
14 | 71 | 14 | 14 | - |
|
10 | 40 | 50 | 10 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q7B. Public benefit: Should this aspect of charity regulation be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 52 | 26 | 13 | 9 |
| All answering | 149 | 57 | 29 | 14 | - |
| Individuals | 79 | 58 | 33 | 9 | - |
| Organisations: | 70 | 56 | 24 | 20 | - |
|
44 | 57 | 20 | 23 | - |
|
14 | 64 | 21 | 14 | - |
|
10 | 40 | 40 | 20 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q7C. Charity trustee duties: Should this aspect of charity regulation be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 66 | 17 | 12 | 6 |
| All answering | 154 | 69 | 18 | 13 | - |
| Individuals | 82 | 78 | 18 | 4 | - |
| Organisations: | 72 | 60 | 17 | 24 | - |
|
45 | 58 | 13 | 29 | - |
|
15 | 67 | 20 | 13 | - |
|
10 | 60 | 20 | 20 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q9A. Reorganisation of statutory and Royal charter charities: Should this technical topic be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 48 | 12 | 35 | 6 |
| All answering | 154 | 51 | 12 | 37 | - |
| Individuals | 81 | 49 | 15 | 36 | - |
| Organisations: | 73 | 52 | 10 | 38 | - |
|
47 | 43 | 9 | 49 | - |
|
14 | 71 | 7 | 21 | - |
|
10 | 70 | 10 | 20 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q9B. Incorporation to a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (SCIO): Should this technical topic be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 53 | 17 | 23 | 7 |
| All answering | 151 | 57 | 18 | 25 | - |
| Individuals | 82 | 55 | 22 | 23 | - |
| Organisations: | 69 | 59 | 13 | 28 | - |
|
44 | 48 | 14 | 39 | - |
|
13 | 92 | 0 | 8 | - |
|
10 | 70 | 20 | 10 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Q9C. Audit income thresholds: Should this technical topic be reviewed?
| Audience | Sample size (n=) | % Yes | % No | % Don’t know | % No answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 163 | 70 | 10 | 14 | 6 |
| All answering | 153 | 75 | 10 | 15 | - |
| Individuals | 82 | 74 | 13 | 12 | - |
| Organisations: | 71 | 75 | 7 | 18 | - |
|
45 | 67 | 7 | 27 | - |
|
13 | 85 | 8 | 8 | - |
|
11 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
|
2 | 50 | 50 | 0 | - |
Contact
Email: charityreview@gov.scot