Big Climate Conversation: report of findings
A summary of findings from the Big Climate Conversation, a public engagement programme about climate change held over six months across Scotland.
The Big Climate Conversation engaged over 2,500 people in Scotland over a six month period in a discussion about Scotland's response to tackling the global climate emergency.
Conversations took place across the whole country in a variety of formats, with events held in over 80% of local authority areas. Participants had the chance to discuss with others the national and societal changes required to transition to a net-zero emissions society.
Participants were able to engage in a variety of different ways. Ten open-audience workshops were held, this included a specific event in Stirling focused at a youth audience. A further 5 facilitated events were held that were specifically targeted at participants with lower prior engagement in climate change. A 'How-To Guide' was also created to enable communities to hold their own conversation events and submit their feedback. This was further supported by a small-grants fund to encourage new audiences to engage in the process. An online event was also held on Twitter.
Due to the differing audiences that engaged in the different workshops, a wide variety of responses was received. For example participants at the 10 open audience workshops were clear in saying they did not think government targets were ambitious enough. This response differed when talking to audiences who were less engaged in climate change issues.
Across responses there was widespread support for increased action on climate change in a variety of areas. A full analysis of sectoral discussions is included within the report.
Although there was a wide range of views expressed throughout The Big Climate Conversation, a number of cross-cutting issues emerged:
1. A holistic and system-wide approach
Participants thought all actions proposed were important, but suggested that they need to be taken forward as part of an integrated plan rather than as individual strands.
2. Government leadership
There was a consensus amongst participants that Government needs to change 'the system' so that low carbon behaviours become the most convenient or only option.
3. A just transition
Participants stressed that action to address climate change should not exacerbate inequalities and, where possible, should reduce them.
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback