Cancer Prehabilitation: Staff perspectives on implementation

This report presents findings from focus groups with cancer prehabilitation staff exploring how cancer prehabilitation is being implemented across the care pathway, and what additional support is needed.


Annex C: Topic guides

Topic guide 1) Pathways and partnerships

  • In an ideal world, what would a multi-modal prehabilitation service look like?
  • What would the roles of the third-sector, local authorities and/or private providers be?
  • What would communication between teams or sectors look like across the whole pathway? Thinking about, for example, communication between prehabilitation and rehabilitation.
  • What would you say about the quality of cross-sector collaboration to deliver prehabilitation?
  • Typically, how are practitioners made aware of local prehabilitation activities? How could communication between teams/ sectors be improved to increase awareness of prehabilitation and support available?
  • What outcome measures are most likely to engage you in prehabilitation, for example, cost avoidance or clinical outcomes?
  • Of the vision that we’ve discussed, where are the ‘quick wins’ (actions that are low effort, high impact) to effective partnership and pathways?
  • Is there anything else you would like to say on the topic of prehabilitation (pathways and partnerships) that you haven’t had a chance to during the session?

Topic guide 2) Service redesign, renewal and sustainability

  • In your view, what would an ideal prehabilitation service(s) look like?
  • What would the funding structure look like?
  • Some of the common concerns raised in the survey were around staffing and sustainability: the importance of dedicated funding to support specialist staff to fill gaps, to deliver a full complement of prehabilitation modes and to ensure staff capacity beyond ad hoc delivery. How do these resonate with your experience? Are there any other barriers you experience as practitioners?
  • How important is it for us to demonstrate effectiveness and cost avoidance? What outcomes can we measure to support this? How would these be recorded, and used?
  • How could prehabilitation services in your area could be improved in a sustainable way?
  • Of the vision that we’ve discussed, where do you think the key areas of focus for a sustainable prehabilitation service should be?
  • Is there anything else you would like to say on the topic of prehabilitation (service redesign, renewal and sustainability) that you haven’t had a chance to during the session?

Contact

Email: socialresearch@gov.scot

Back to top