People who self-harm: rapid evidence review and survey of practitioner perspectives
This rapid evidence review and survey of practitioner perspectives investigated if self-harm can be a barrier to accessing support and services, and what measures can be taken to overcome these barriers.
Appendix 1: SPIDER Table of Search Terms
Sample
- UK
- “United Kingdom”
- Scotland
- England
- N. Ireland
- Wales
- Youth
- “Young people”
- “Older people”
- LGBT+
- Neurodivergent
- Prisoners
- “Looked after”
Phenomenon of Interest
- Self-harm*
- “Self-harm”
- “Self-injury”
- SH
- “Self-violence”
- Cutting
- “Self-poisoning”
- “Self-inflicted violence” “Self-injurious behaviour”
- “Self-injurious behaviour”
- “Physical harm”
- “Mental Health problem”
- Help-seek*
- “Help-seeking behaviour”
- Seek*
- Support
- Therapy
- Counselling
- “Primary care”
- Emergency
- A&E
- “Accident & Emergency”
- Treatment
- Intervention
- “Psychological support”
- CAMHS
- Crisis
- “Mental Health services”
- NHS
Design
- Focus group*
- Interview*
- Observation*
- Randomised Control Trial
- Ethnography Ethnographical Qualitative
- Survey
- Questionnaire
Evaluation
- Barrier*
- Challenges
- Block*
- Obstacle*
- Obstruct*
- Hurdle*
- Difficulty
- Problem*
- Stop*
- Limit*
- Hinder*
- Impact
- Facilitat*
- Motivat*
- Enabl*
- Aid*
- Assist*
- Support*
- Allow*
- Permit*
- Ease*
- Promote*
Research Type
- Mixed methods
- Qualitative
- Quantitative
Contact
Email: socialresearch@gov.scot