Publication - Consultation responses

2014 Consultation on the management of inshore Special Areas of Conservation and Marine Protected Areas - Consultation analysis report

Published: 10 Jul 2015
Part of:
Marine and fisheries
ISBN:
9781785444890

2014 Consultation on the management of inshore Special Areas of Conservation and Marine Protected Areas - Consultation analysis report. Summary of the responses received relating to each site.

236 page PDF

11.9 MB

236 page PDF

11.9 MB

Contents
2014 Consultation on the management of inshore Special Areas of Conservation and Marine Protected Areas - Consultation analysis report
Appendix 7: East Mingulay SAC Management Measures

236 page PDF

11.9 MB

Appendix 7: East Mingulay SAC Management Measures

Figure A7.1 - Map of proposed measures

Figure A7.1 – Map of proposed measures

Table A7.1 - Site level assessment of measures [1]

East Mingulay SAC

Area (KM [2] )

As %

Site

114.89

Protected from creels, set nets and long lines

57.72

50%

Protected from mechanical dredge, suction dredge, beam trawls, and demersal trawls

114.89

100%

Table A7.2 - Qualifying feature assessment [2] - Protected from creels, set nets and long lines

SAC Qualifying Feature

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Lophelia pertusa reefs

Area (km 2)

3.61

3.61

100%

Count

6

6

100%

Stony Reefs

Area (km 2)

11.78

6.19

53%

Table A7.3 - Qualifying feature assessment - Protected from demersal trawls, mechanical dredge, suction dredge and beam trawls

SAC Qualifying Feature

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Lophelia pertusa reefs

Area (km 2)

3.61

3.61

100%

Count

6

6

100%

Stony reefs

Area (km 2)

11.78

11.78

100%

Table A7.4 - Priority Marine Feature Added Value Assessment - Protected from creels, set nets and long lines#s included need to calculate.distribution of these responses is also showning cumbers, and burrowed. Therefore we cannot imple

Other PMFs

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Burrowed mud (Fireworks anemone)

Count

12

5

41.7%

Burrowed mud (Tall seapen)

Count

5

2

40%

Burrowed mud (Tall seapens and burrowing megafauna)

Count

2

0

0%

Northern feather star

Count

7

2

28.6%

Northern sea fan and sponge communities

Area (km 2)

7.02

7.02

100%

Count

3

2

66.7%

White cluster anemone

Count

12

9

75%

Table A7.5 - Priority Marine Feature Added Value Assessment - Protected from mechanical dredge, suction dredge, beam trawls, and demersal trawl

Other PMFs

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Burrowed mud (Fireworks anemone)

Count

12

12

100%

Burrowed mud (Tall seapen)

Count

5

5

100%

Burrowed mud (Tall seapens and burrowing megafauna)

Count

2

2

100%

Northern feather star

Count

7

7

100%

Northern sea fan and sponge communities

Count

3

3

100%

Area (km 2)

7.02

7.02

100%

White cluster anemone

Count

12

12

100%

Table A7.6 - Other Marine Habitat Added Value Assessment [3] - Protected from creels, set nets and long lines#s included need to calculate.distribution of these responses is also showning cumbers, and burrowed. Therefore we cannot imple

Other Habitats

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment communities

Count

5

3

60%

Offshore circalittoral mud communities

Count

3

1

33%

Table A7.7 - Other Marine Habitat Added Value Assessment - Protected from mechanical dredge, suction dredge, beam trawls, and demersal trawls

Other Habitats

Feature Records

Records Included

% Included

Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment communities

Count

5

5

100%

Offshore circalittoral mud communities

Count

3

3

100%


Contact