Information

Scottish Parliament election: 7 May. This site won't be routinely updated during the pre-election period.

Superfast, ultrafast and gigabit capable broadband infrastructure - open market review: request for information - January 2026

An Open Market Review into current and planned broadband infrastructure across Scotland. The outcome will support the planning and prioritisation of public interventions and minimise the risk of disrupting commercial plans. Data collected will inform broadband interventions in Scotland.


Annex B: Data submission format

Introduction

The Scottish Government requires certain fields of data for each pertinent Scottish address as identified by the UPRN in order to monitor the current and future delivery of superfast and gigabit-capable services. This is done by requesting data on current and future connections from relevant suppliers. The below describes the format of the request file and how to format the data to return to us. If you require any additional support, guidance or clarification with this, please get in touch with us at: gigabitomr@gov.scot

UPRN list files

The Scottish Government can provide a list of UPRNs if required. Please direct any requests to: gigabitomr@gov.scot

The UPRNs used for this OMR will be sourced from Ordnance Survey AddressBase Premium Epoch 124, published January 2026 using the following high-level logic:

  • addressbase_postal = 'N' are marked as ineligible i.e. not a postal address
  • CountryCode is ‘S’ i.e. within Scotland
  • LogicalStatusCode found in the Local Property Identifier is restricted to either to ‘1’ (approved) or ‘6’ (provisional)
  • LogicalStatusCode found in the BLPU table is restricted to ‘1', but if the BLPU State Code is NULL a LogicalStatusCode of '6' is also accepted.
  • Sort by entry date (descending) and remove UPRN duplicates (more recent records are given a priority over older records when multiple Local Property Identifier records are given for one UPRN).
  • A number of specific classifications are also excluded, those which the Scottish Government deem not eligible for a broadband connection. A list of classifications can be made available on request.

Further details can be obtained via the AddressBase Premium Technical Specification.[10]

Please do not pre-filter your data based on the UPRN files, instead please provide us with your entire UPRN dataset.

If you are using the UPRN files as the starting point for your return, please remove any UPRN rows which are not part of your current or planned network.

Please note that final UPRN datasets generated during IA design and issued as part of the invitation to tender (ITT) for procurements are further filtered, and deprioritised where necessary subject to factors such as UPRN proximity, type and location.

Explanation of Required Fields

The information that to be provided against each property/premises is as follows:

Field name: struprn

Description: The UPRN (see below) prepended with “STR”, this is a mitigation against certain spreadsheet tools treating the UPRN as a large number and removing significant digits

Format: Text

Field name: uprn

Description: The unique property reference number. This is a mandatory field. Any rows without a UPRN will be rejected.

Format: Number

Field name: address

Description: Comma delimited single line address (e.g. 1, Acacia Avenue, Anytown)

Format: Text

Field name: postcode

Description: Standard postcode

Format: Text

Field name: local_authority

Description: The local authority district

Format: Text

Field name: easting

Description: Six figure number for the X co-ordinate (British National Grid)

Format: Number

Field name: northing

Description: Six figure number for the Y co-ordinate (British National Grid)

Format: Number

Field name: longitude

Description: Longitude in the decimal degree format (WGS84)

Format: Number

Field Name: latitude

Description: Latitude in the decimal degree format (WGS84)

Format: Number

The connectivity information that we ask for against each property/premises is as follows (please note the definitions provided after the table below):

Field name: current_tech

Complete this field for UPRNs which are Ready for service (RFS) only

Description: The technology you use for supplying that particular premises, examples of this could be ADSL, FTTP, FTTC etc

Format: Text

Field name: current_max_ds

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’

Description: The maximum wholesale download speed in Mbit/s that you are able to supply to this property. This should be a positive number only.

Format: Number

Field name: current_max_us

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’

Description: The maximum wholesale upload speed in Mbit/s that you are able to supply to this property. This should be a positive number only.

Format: Number

Field name: future_tech

Complete this field for UPRNs that you plan to connect only

Description: The technology you intend to use for supplying that particular premises, examples of this could be FTTC, FTTP etc

Format: Text

Field name: future_max_ds

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: The maximum wholesale download speed in Mbit/s that you intend to be able to supply to this property. This should be a positive number only.

Format: Number

Field name: future_max_us

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: The maximum wholesale upload speed in Mbit/s that you intend to be able to supply to this property. This should be a positive number only.

Format: Number

Field name: date_future_rollout

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: This should be the planned RFS date for the premises and should align to your Calendar Deployment Plan and should correlate and be consistent with the information contained in your Supporting Evidence Pack. This should not be the date that build commences.

Format: DD/MM/YYYY

Field name: delivery_phase

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: The planned phase for any future rollout which each UPRN shall form part of, e.g. Phase 1/Phase 2 etc, Tranche 1/Tranche 2 etc, Region 1/Region 2 etc

Format: Text

Field name: design_stage

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: The current phase of your coverage by using one of the following field entries: 0. On hold, 0. On hold – blocked, 1. Awaiting HLD, 2. HLD complete, 3. LLD complete, 4. Build team appointed, 5. In build, or 6. RFS

Format:Text

Field name: funding_stage

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Future_Technology’

Description: Field entries to use: 1. No funding planned or committed, 2. Funding planned, but not committed, or 3. Funding committed

Format: Text

Field name: public_intervention

Complete this field for all UPRNs with either ‘Current_Technology’ or ‘Future_Technology’

Description: Define if coverage has been or is planned to be connected using a public intervention.

Format: Yes/No

Field name: public_intervention_type

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’ or ‘Future_Technology’ where ‘Public_Intervention’ is ‘Yes’

Description: This is the public intervention type, whereby the field entries to use are outlined in the definitions below.

Format: Text

Field name: public_intervention_reference

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’ or ‘Future_Technology’ where ‘Public_Intervention’ is ‘Yes’

Description: This is the public intervention reference, whereby the field entries to use are outlined in the definitions below.

Format: Text

Field name: gbvs_prp_reference

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’ or ‘Future_Technology’) where ‘Public_Intervention’ is ‘Yes’ and Public_Intervention_Type is GBVS (pre request) or GBVS (post request)

Description: This is a Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme pre-registered package (PRP) project reference; examples of field entries are as follows:

AA1001 (Pre-BDUK Voucher Funding Platform),

AB10000001 (Post-BDUK Voucher Funding Platform)

Format: Text

Field name: loc_code

Complete this field for all UPRNs where design_stage is ‘0. On hold’ or ‘0. On hold – blocked’.

Description: This is the Limit Of Construction (LOC) code for use alongside the design_stage entries of ‘0. On hold – blocked' and ‘0. On hold’. If there is more than one LOC code applicable please choose the primary reason for the build being on hold. The field entries to use are outlined in the definitions below.

Format: Text

Response Definitions

Ready for Service (RFS): RFS means a service can be ordered by a Communications Provider (CP) or end user for the premises and provisioned within industry standard timescales with no excess construction charges being applied to the CP or end user directly or indirectly (i.e. any end user would expect to pay only a published pre-agreed connection charge, if one was to be imposed, too), unless and to the extent that such excess construction charges are incurred due to a reason directly attributable to the private land of the end user, or of any landlord of the end user.

Future Rollout: All UPRNs must have a date of future rollout based on the expected RFS date for each premise. These dates must correlate with information provided in your Deployment Plan as part of your supporting evidence.

Delivery Phase: These phases should align to your Calendar Deployment Plan and should correlate and be consistent with the information contained in your Supporting Evidence Pack. Include context regarding each delivery phase in your Supporting Evidence Pack such as the risks and dependencies for the successful delivery of each phase and the mitigations/arrangements that you have in place to address these risks; a description regarding your resourcing plan for each phase; key milestones within each phase and the subsequent activities/timeframes to achieve RFS.

Design Phases:

‘0. On hold’ – Planned build to the premises has been placed on hold proactively, but may be restarted in future. Premises in this category should therefore be recorded in the Future_Technology columns. Build is not blocked by any external factors, but is likely to have been placed on hold for strategic decisions, perhaps related to funding or competitor activity for example (which should be explained in supporting evidence and clarified in your use of the ‘LOC_Code’ column).

‘0. On hold – blocked' – Build to complete the fibre network, in line with the Ready for Service definition, is blocked without a solution in place. Premises in this category should therefore be recorded in the Future_Technology columns. This is most likely to be caused by lack of 3rd party wayleaves, but could be as a result of other external blockers (which should be explained in supporting evidence and clarified in your use of the ‘LOC_Code’ column).

‘1. Awaiting HLD’ – High Level Design (HLD) has not yet been completed. ‘2. HLD complete’ – HLD/area level plan has been completed. However, Low Level Design (LLD) work has not yet been completed or is in progress. ‘3. LLD complete’ – LLD and survey work has been completed, however, subcontractors/build partners, or in-house resources to complete the network build, are still to be appointed. ‘4. Build team appointed’ – Subcontractors / build partners or if applicable in-house civil resource has been appointed and commissioned to start the network build in accordance with the LLDs. All the necessary planning, acquisitions and wayleave agreements are finalised to allow the network to be constructed. ‘5. In build’ – Network build is in progress, however premises are not yet able to take up a service. ‘6. RFS’ – Network build and end-to-end testing is complete and premises are RFS.

Funding Stage: The status of funding allocated to the UPRN. If your funding allocation is linked to your Delivery_Phase please reflect that in your data and explain in your Supporting Evidence Pack. The Scottish Government’s assessment of supplier returns will be based, in full, on the evidence requested in Annex C. As such, we cannot guarantee that we will accept how suppliers have categorised the status of their funding position.

Funding Stage Options:

‘1. No funding planned or committed’ - While you may be planning to deliver to this UPRN, the funding is not yet in place to do so and/or you are seeking funding. ‘2. Funding planned, but not committed’ - You have in principle funding agreed to deliver to this UPRN, but the funding is not immediately available, requires further decisions such as Board approval, or is dependent on (for example) performance metrics. ‘3. Funding committed’ - Funding has been identified and has been allocated to delivery of this UPRN. There are no further conditions around drawing down or using funding and the funding is ring-fenced solely for the delivery of associated premises. This should be explained clearly in your financial plan, which should be provided as part of your Supporting Evidence Pack.

Public Intervention:

Define if coverage has been or is planned to be connected using a public intervention. ‘Yes’ will be marked when a premises is dependent on funding from vouchers, GigaHubs, Superfast, LFFN, RGC, R100, SBVS or GIS Programmes, or when an existing service was built with funding from one of those Programmes. Any other public interventions (such as Local Authority schemes) should also be acknowledged and marked as a ‘Yes’ here. Further explanation should be referenced within your Supporting Evidence Pack. An entry of ‘No’ would indicate that the premises is planned to be built, or has already been built, entirely through commercial funding with no dependency on public intervention. Evidence of this funding should be provided in your Supporting Evidence Pack. Where you have indicated that a UPRN is dependent on public intervention by providing a ‘Yes’ in the ‘Public_Intervention’ column within your data coverage response; the approach by the Scottish Government is to provide a default Gigabit White determination to any planned build and to supersede this determination with project-specific intervention data as described in the OMR/PR - Subsidy Control Classification Guidance. Any current build would not usually undergo this same approach.

Public Intervention Type:

GIS (pre contract award)’ - Gigabit Infrastructure Subsidy, pre contract award; GIS (post contract award)’ – Gigabit Infrastructure Subsidy, post contract award for contracted and ‘Incidental Coverage’ premises, relevant only where you have secured a GIS contract. For a definition of Incidental Coverage premises, please refer to the instructions for completing the Financial Model in the ITT or contract; ‘Superfast’ – Coverage from the 2012 or 2016 National Broadband Scheme, including the Digital Scotland Superfast Broadband Programme (DSSB); ‘R100’ – Coverage planned or delivered via the R100 contracts; ‘SBVS (post approval)’ – voucher approved, not yet delivered; ‘SBVS (build complete)’ – voucher receipted, service delivered; ‘GBVS (pre request)’ – GBVS, before a Voucher has been requested;

GBVS (post request)’ – GBVS, after a Voucher has been requested / issued; ‘LFFN’ - Local Full Fibre Network; ‘GigaHubs’ – GigaHubs Project; ‘RGC’ – Rural Gigabit Connectivity. Additional public intervention types can also be provided, such as Local Authority funded schemes.

Public Intervention Reference:

GIS (pre contract award) – eg C0999, Lot 1;

GIS (post contract award) – eg C0999, Lot 1;

Superfast – Superfast Contract eg R100 North;

GBVS (pre request) – Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme ‘blank’ as no Voucher IDs available;

GBVS (post request) – Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme Voucher ID once requested and issued eg GV3NITM6;

SBVS (post requrest) – eg SBVS[UPRN]

GBVS PRP Reference:

Complete this field for all UPRNs with ‘Current_Technology’ or ‘Future_Technology’ where ‘Public_Intervention’ is ‘Yes’. Where an entry for both ‘Current_Technology’ and ‘Future_Technology’ is provided this entry will relate to the ‘Future_Technology’. This is a Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme voucher project reference, examples of field entries are as follows:

AA1001 (Pre BDUK Voucher Funding Platform), AB10000001 (Post BDUK Voucher Funding Platform)

LOC Code:

The following table of LOC Code types should be used when populating your LOC_Code column. If you believe you have a LOC type that is not covered here, please use the 15- OTHER code and add an additional ‘LOC_Code_Description’ column at the end of your data return to provide a free-text explanation of the non-standard issue you are experiencing.

If there is more than one reason that your build is on hold, please choose the primary reason for the build being on hold and consider adding further LOC_Code columns (e.g. ‘LOC_Code_1’, ‘LOC_Code_2’ and so on) to the end of your data return to provide a secondary, tertiary code etc if needed

loc_code: 1-JUP

LOC Type: Joint user pole

LOC Description: Joint user pole license unable to be obtained

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 2-MDU

LOC Type: MDU

LOC Description: Restrictions with MDU build and access

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 3-PIA

LOC Type: PIA

LOC Description: Restrictions to Public Infrastructure Access Network

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code:

LOC Type:

LOC Description:

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 4-SEC58

LOC Type: Section 58

LOC Description: Restrictions on road status - unadopted or newly resurfaced

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 5-SUR

LOC Type: Survey

LOC Description: Restrictions around listed buildings, monuments, Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) & Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). Additional permissions and provisioning barriers

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 6-WAY

LOC Type: Wayleave

LOC Description: Requires wayleave permission for private land or system process (build & sale)

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 7-SURF

LOC Type: Surface type reinstatement

LOC Description: Issues around surface type for reinstatements relating to permissions for example, if a shared drive etc

design_stage: 0. On hold - blocked

loc_code: 8-CURT

LOC Type: Fibre to the curtilage only

LOC Description: Build is planned to terminate at the curtilage only, for premises such as static homes and holiday parks due to build policy

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 9-NEW

LOC Type: New build

LOC Description: Anticipated to be provisioned via an alternative provider as part of Building Regulations covering new build properties

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 10-FILT

LOC Type: Filtered UPRN premises type

LOC Description: UPRN is not currently recognised as a valid premises, but is currently being reviewed. Premises such as water tower or caravans that would not benefit from gigabit following supplier investigation

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 11-SED

LOC Type: Special Engineering Difficulty

LOC Description: Required special engineering and may be out of cost (e.g. directional drilling)

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 12-UEC

LOC Type: Uneconomical, exceeds cost

LOC Description: Outside of budget/uneconomical/not value for money

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 13-DIG

LOC Type: Direct In Ground

LOC Description: Route has no duct and the cost of retro-fitting duct is not commercially viable

design_stage: 0. On hold

loc_code: 14-OTHER

LOC Type: Other

LOC Description: Any other Limit Of Construction not covered by the above categories. Please provide an additional non-standard column at the end of your data return (e.g. 'LOC_Description', or similar) to provide a description of the blocker. SG will review this description during the OMR and may request further information

design_stage: Either:

‘0. On hold’ or ‘0. On hold - blocked’

Any additional context should be included as an extra, non-standard, ‘LOC_Code_Description’ column at the end of your data return.

loc_code: 15-EXCE

LOC Type: Excess construction charge

LOC Description: Service cannot be provisioned because of an excess construction charge incurred due to a reason directly attributable to the private land of the end user, or of any landlord of the end user.

design_stage: 6. RFS

Extra columns

Aside from the standard columns above, you may wish to add additional columns to provide additional information about your network. If this is the case, please add additional column(s) at the end of your data return and provide a clear explanation in your Supporting Evidence Pack of what these columns indicate.

Logic Table

The logic table should be used as a reference when populating your data coverage submission. It demonstrates the typical data presentation that you should provide to the Scottish Government and is consistent with the common data checks carried out.

Cells that have been ‘greyed out’ should not be populated for the example scenarios provided.

The logic table can be downloaded from the ‘supporting documents’ section of this publication.

Frequently Asked Questions

To help with your submission the following FAQs have been provided for your reference.

1. I am planning on delivering to an area and would like to claim some Vouchers there. How should I reflect this in my OMR return, particularly if I am unsure on the specific UPRNs that I intend to claim Vouchers for?

1.1. If you can indicate in your OMR return which specific UPRNs are commercially funded and which are wholly/partially dependent on Vouchers, then please use the Public_Intervention column to show this.

1.2. If you are unable to identify the specific UPRNs at the time of your OMR return, you have two options:

1.2.1. Mark all UPRNs as ‘No’ for Public_Intervention i.e. all UPRNs are to be delivered using commercial funding. This may result in these UPRNs being classified as Under Review, Grey or Black subject to the presence of other suppliers and therefore being ineligible for Voucher funding.

1.2.2. Mark all UPRNs as ‘Yes’ for Public_Intervention i.e. all UPRNs are dependent on at least some public subsidy and without this subsidy you would not deliver there commercially. This is likely to result in these UPRNs being marked as White for your submission and therefore they could be eligible for Voucher funding subject to the presence of other suppliers.

2. Why should I respond to the OMR if I’m fully reliant on public subsidy funding? (i.e. Public_Intervention = Yes for all UPRNs)

2.1. If your future network plans are entirely reliant on public subsidy/interventions (e.g. vouchers) it may not be necessary for you to provide a complete set of supporting evidence alongside your data submission.

2.2. Technical Evidence is still required, however, the requirements relating to Financial/Commercial details may not be required on your Supporting Evidence Pack. If you are providing a first-time submission, we will advise if further information is required.

2.3. By providing a submission, this also ensures that we can represent your data correctly to encourage voucher eligibility accuracy; and also allows us to complete a comparison exercise with public subsidy data that we currently hold to ensure alignment with yourselves.

3. Why can’t the Scottish Government use my Ofcom’s Connected Nations data submission?

3.1. The Open Market Review (OMR) and Public Review (PR) - Subsidy Control Classification Guidance[11] provides strict guidance for the assessment of supplier submissions to create a legal baseline for intervention.

3.2. The Ofcom Connected Nations data is not collected for this purpose and is therefore not subject to the same assessment criteria.

4. How often should I update my OMR data / Supporting Evidence Pack?

4.1. Keep us updated - in a dynamic market, it’s difficult for us to assess information as valid if it’s more than six months old for example.

4.2. Where your evidence no longer aligns with your data coverage submission and / or your evidence has timed out, evaluators will request additional information from you.

4.3. For example, evidence and/or data that has not been updated for a long time by supplier X, who last provided evidence in January 2023. This would now likely be out of date and we would assume you would like to update this to reflect the current position in your Supporting Evidence Pack.

4.4. Suppliers are expected to sign off their Submission Information tab for every release of their Supporting Evidence Pack even if just to confirm that there is no change from the previous submission.

5. I have an existing contract e.g. R100 or Project Gigabit in Scotland GIS contract, how should I represent planned incidental build within my submission?

5.1 Please see scenario 4 within the logic table which shows that this coverage should be represented with Public_Intervention = ‘Yes’ and Public_Intervention_Type = ‘GIS (post contract award)’

5.2 If this GIS contract were to fall away for whatever reason, or this aspect of the coverage were to fall away within the contract, then these UPRNs should be updated in your next OMR and either removed from the planned coverage, or represented as commercial plans (i.e. Public_Intervention = ‘No’)

5.3 As this build progresses to RFS then please ensure your OMR return is updated to reflect scenario 2 in the logic table

6. Why can’t the Scottish Government use the UK Government’s national OMR data?

6.1 The Scottish Government captures data for additional purposes to UK Government, in particular superfast coverage to allow for monitoring against the R100 programme and SBVS eligibility.

6.2 In terms of GIS contracts, the Scottish Government is the procuring authority for Type A and Type B contracts and therefore has responsibility for the Subsidy Control compliance of those contracts.

7. I have completed infrastructure build to the curtilage of the property, but as the premises is part of a Multi-Dwelling Unit (MDU)/on a private road etc, I am unable to complete the fibre network and provision a service without a wayleave. Approval for that wayleave is not yet in place, but I am working on it. This may result in an excess construction charge and/or a delay to the provision of the service. How shall I reflect this in my data return?

7.1. As you do not yet have an agreed wayleave, and the process of getting one is going to result in a delay to the provision of the services and/or an excess construction charge being applied, this does not meet the definition of Ready for Service (RFS). Therefore these premises should be recorded using the Future_Technology columns and with a Design_Stage of ‘0. On hold - blocked’ to reflect that completion of your build is currently blocked.

7.2. Once you receive approval of all the necessary wayleaves you will be able to record these premises as Current_Technology (assuming they meet all the other criteria of the RFS definition).

7.3. For any premises marked as ‘0. On hold - blocked’ that result in a Gigabit White determination public subsidy to these premises will be considered on a case-by-case basis, but from the starting assumption that any subsidised build may similarly run into the same issues blocking achievement of RFS commercially.

7.4. Other scenarios where you might use the ‘0. On hold – blocked’ status include land ownership issues, private road access and section 58 notices. Please populate the LOC_Code column with the relevant LOC type (see above for a list of LOC codes) to ensure the main reason for the premises being on hold is clear.

8. I have completed infrastructure build to the curtilage of the property, but I am unable to complete the fibre network and provision a service without the end user paying an additional excess construction charge. This charge was not published or pre-agreed. However, this excess construction charge is a result of the landowner (on which the end user’s property sits) demanding payment for agreeing wayleave access. How shall I reflect this in my data return?

8.1. According to the definition of RFS published as part of this OMRRFS means a service can be ordered by a Communications Provider (CP) or end user for the premises and provisioned within industry standard timescales with no excess construction charges being applied to the CP or end user directly or indirectly (ie any end user would expect to pay only a published pre-agreed connection charge, if one was to be imposed, too), unless and to the extent that such excess construction charges are incurred due to a reason directly attributable to the private land of the end user, or of any landlord of the end user.”

8.2. As the excess construction charge is directly attributable to the landlord of the end user, you are therefore able to record this in your OMR data as Current_Technology with a Design_Stage of ‘6. RFS’. In this scenario please ensure you populate the LOC_Code for these premises with ‘15-EXCE’ to highlight these instances.

9. I have network infrastructure built to the curtilage of the property, but I am unable to complete the fibre network and provision a service as a competitor has achieved RFS build before me. It is no longer financially viable to complete the fibre network in line with the definition of RFS provided in Scottish Government’s OMR. How shall I reflect this in my data return?

9.1. A proactive decision has been taken to put this build on hold. The build is not blocked and could be restarted in future to achieve the RFS definition. As it stands, the build does not meet the definition of RFS.

9.2. Therefore the premises should be marked as Future_Technology with a Design_Stage of ‘0 - On hold’ to reflect that, even though build is not blocked, it is no longer progressing through the expected Design_Stage categories of one (1. Awaiting HLD) through to six (6. RFS). Ensure you populate the ‘LOC_Code’ column to provide the main LOC type reason for these premises being on hold.

9.3. If in future this build again becomes viable, you should amend the Design_Stage entry to the one that best matches its current build status, choosing between categories one through to six.

10. I am a supplier planning build to an MDU property. I have permission to access the MDU, but am unable to complete the network due to the complexity of the build itself. How should I reflect this in my data return?

10.1. If you are unable to complete the build as it is too complex, then you should reflect this simply as ‘0. On hold’, as you are not blocked from building. Consider using LOC_Code entries of ‘11-SED’ or ‘12-UEC’ to reflect that the cost would be prohibitive to overcome this level of complexity for example.

10.2. If you have been denied entry to the MDU, or are blocked due to other issues beyond your control, such as fire regulations and lack of permissions, you can use the ‘0. On hold – blocked’ Design_Stage and corresponding ‘2-MDU’ LOC_Code, or ‘6-WAY’

11. I am delivering build via public subsidy and am currently discussing a change to the contract/project. How should I represent this in my OMR return?

11.1. Wherever possible, please present the latest contractual baseline ie if you are discussing changes to scope with the Scottish Government, please do not include these in your OMR return until they are formally signed off by the Scottish Government.

11.2. However, if you have already made irreversible changes to your database and planned build data (e.g. if discussions are advanced and close to formal approval) you are able to submit these in your OMR alongside a statement that explains why your OMR return does not match the contractual baseline held by the Scottish Government.

Contact

Email: gigabitomr@gov.scot

Back to top