Reducing the Drink Driving Limit in Scotland Analysis of Consultation Responses

This is the analysis of consultation responses


7 Summary

7.1 There were 138 responses to the consultation; this included 82 individuals and 56 organisations.

7.2 There was majority agreement that the drink drive limits should be reduced in Scotland. There was also majority support for the Scottish Government's proposal to reduce the drink driving limits.

7.3 When asked to provide any evidence for the main consequences of the proposals, respondents mentioned impacts such as fewer road accidents, fewer casualties or the reduced risk of road accidents. Road accident figures from other countries which have lowered their limits were quoted. Other impacts identified by respondents related to a potential loss of business for local pubs, restaurants and hotels or a loss of tourism business to Scotland. There were concerns over a lack of available data and calls for more data to be collected or made available in relation to drink driving accidents.

7.4 Respondents were also asked whether they had any evidence for what would be the financial impact of the Scottish Government proposals. Most of those who answered did not provide figures.

7.5 While some respondents commented that longer-term savings would increasingly outweigh any additional costs, others expressed concern over a potential loss of business to the licensed trade and tourism; rural areas in particular were seen as vulnerable. There was some concern over a lack of quantifiable evidence with which to assess savings.

7.6 Very few respondents commented on ancillary matters.

7.7 A wide range of other measures that should be considered in order to tackle drink driving were suggested by respondents. The main suggestions were:

  • Zero limit.
  • 20mg limit.
  • Different limits for different types of drivers.
  • Concern over morning after issues if the limit is lowered.
  • The need for random breath testing.
  • The need for stronger enforcement; especially more visible policing.
  • The need for stricter penalties; vehicle forfeiture in particular.
  • The need for education on the limits and the effects of alcohol; particular emphasis on young or new drivers.
  • The need for publicity campaigns to promote the new limit and to promote the don't drink and drive message.
  • Concern over persistent offenders and the need to target this group.
  • The need to look at preventative measures.

7.8 The findings from this consultation will help to inform policy thinking and support discussion on what else can be done to tackle the scourge of drink driving in Scotland.

Contact

Email: Jim Wilson

Back to top