Private sector access to public sector personal data: exploring data value and benefit-sharing

The aim of this review is to enable the Scottish Government to explore the issues relevant to the access of public sector personal data.


1. Abboud, L. et al. (2021) Summary of results: case studies on barriers to cross border sharing of health data for secondary use. TEHDAS Milestone. Retrieved 8 July, 2022, from

2. Aidinlis, S. (2022) Chapter 5: Government-to-Business (G2B) research data sharing and the GDPR: Reconciling the public with the private? In E. Kosta, R. Leenes & I. Kamara (Eds.) Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law (pp. 115-142). Edward Elgar.

3. Aitken, M., Porteous, C., Creamer, E., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2018). Who benefits and how? Public expectations of public benefits from data-intensive health research. Big Data & Society, 5(2).

4. Andanda, P. (2019) Towards a Paradigm Shift in Governing Data Access and Related Intellectual Property Rights in Big Data and Health-Related Research. IIC 50, 1052-1081.

5. Ballantyne, A., & Schaefer, G. O. (2020) Public interest in health data research: Laying out the conceptual groundwork. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(9), 610-616. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106152

6. Beeck Center for Social Impact + Innovation (2017) Accelerating the Sharing of Data Across Sectors to Advance the Common Good" by the (U.S.). Georgetown University. Retrieved 5 August, 2022, from

7. Blankertz A. (2020) How to use data for the public interest, even - or especially - in a pandemic. Heinrich Böll Foundation Commentary. Retrieved 2 July, 2022, from

8. Borgesius, F. Z., Gray, J., & van Eechoud, M. (2015) Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Balancing Framework. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30(3), 2073–2131.

9. Braunack-Mayer, A. et al. (2021) Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey. J Med Internet Res, 23(10): e24200.

10. Cheung, S. (2020) Disambiguating the benefits and risks from public health data in the digital economy. Big Data & Society, 7(1).

11. Comandè, G., & Schneider, G. (2022) it's time. Leveraging the gdpr to shift the balance towards research-friendly eu data spaces. Common Market Law Review, 59(3), 739-776. doi:10.54648/COLA2022051

12. CORSS (2021) Streamlining the responsible sharing of public sector data. Retrieved 10 August, 2022, from

13. CORSS (2022) New public sector data sharing laws: key considerations for the private sector. Retrieved 10 August, 2022, from

14. European Commission (2019) Digital Single Market: EU negotiators agree on new rules for sharing of public sector data. Press release. Retrieved 2 August, 2022, from

15. Guay, R., & Birch, K. (2022) A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data in the USA and EU (2008–2016). Big Data & Society, 9(2).

16. Hopkins Van Mil (2021) Putting Good into practice - A Findings Report. PGiP report. Retrieved 2 June, 2022, from

17. Huston, P., Edge, V.L., & Bernier, E. (2019) Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health. Can Commun Dis Rep. 45(11).

18. Hutchings, E., Loomes, M., Butow, P., & Boyle, F. M. (2020) A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: A focus on privacy, trust, and transparency. Systematic Reviews, 9(1) doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01481-9

19. Igumbor JO, Bosire EN, Vicente-Crespo M et al. (2021) Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices. Wellcome Open Res, 6:214

20. Involve (2018) Data for Public Benefit Balancing the risks and benefits of data sharing. Retrieved 5 July, 2022, from

21. Jenkner, C. S., Ravi, N., Gabel, M., & Vogt, J.-C. (2022) Trust in data-requesting organizations—A quantitative analysis on cultural antecedents and individual-level perceptions. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 88(4), e12208.

22. Fischli, R. (2022) Data-owning democracy: Citizen empowerment through data ownership. European Journal of Political Theory, doi:10.1177/14748851221110316

23. Laurie, G., & Stevens, L. (2016) Developing a Public Interest Mandate for the Governance and Use of Administrative Data in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society, 43(3), 360–392.

24. Liddell, K., Simon, D., Lucassen, S. (2021) Patient data ownership: who owns your health?, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8 (2)

25. Lucas, J.C. et al. (2013) Donating Human Samples: Who Benefits? Cases from Iceland, Kenya and Indonesia. In D. Schroeder & J.C. Lucas (Eds.) Benefit-sharing. Springer.

26. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015) Service innovation. MIS quarterly 39(1), 155-176.MISQ/2015/39.1.07">

27. Martens, B. & Duch Brown, N. (2020) The economics of business to-government data sharing, JRC Digital Economy Working Paper, No. 2020-04, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved 10 July, 2022, from

28. Mészáros, J., & Ho, C. -. (2018) Big data and scientific research: The secondary use of personal data under the research exemption in the GDPR. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 59(4), 403-419. doi:10.1556/2052.2018.59.4.5

29. Micheli, M., Ponti, M., Craglia, M., & Berti Suman, A. (2020) Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data & Society 7(2).

30. Mockus, M. (2017) Open Government Data Licensing Framework: An Informal Ontology for Supporting Mashup. PhD Thesis defended at the University of Bologna. Retrieved 1 August, 2022, from

31. Munné, R. (2016) Big Data in the Public Sector. In J. Cavanillas, E. Curry & W. Wahlster (Eds.) New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy. Springer.

32. OECD (2015) Assessing government initiatives on public sector information: A review of the OECD Council Recommendation. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 248. Retrieved 13 August, 2022, from

33. OECD (2019) Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data: Reconciling Risks and Benefits for Data Re-use across Societies. Retrieved 22 July, 2022, from

34. OECD (2020) Statement by the Committee on Digital Economy Policy. Retrieved 22 July, 2022, from

35. OECD (2020) Chapter 5. Enhancing data access, sharing and re-use. OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2020. Retrieved 22 July, 2022, from

36. OECD (2022) Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data. OECD instruments. Retrieved 22 July, 2022, from

37. Ormondroyd, E., Border, P., Hayward, J. et al. (2022) Genomic health data generation in the UK: a 360 view. Eur J Hum Genet 30, 782–789.

38. Research Data Alliance (2016) RDA Principles on the Legal Interoperability of Research Data. Retrieved 2 August, 2022, from

39. Christine Rinik (2020) Data trusts: more data than trust? The perspective of the data subject in the face of a growing problem, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34:3, 342-363, DOI: 10.1080/13600869.2019.1594621

40. Schaefer, G.O., Laurie, G., Menon, S. et al. (2020) Clarifying how to deploy the public interest criterion in consent waivers for health data and tissue research. BMC Med Ethics 21, 23,

41. Scharfbillig, M. et al. (2021) Values and Identities - a policymaker's guide. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 18 September, 2022, from

42. Schroeder, D. (2007) Benefit-sharing: It's Time for a Definition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(4), 205–209.

43. Science Europe (2021) Science Europe Response to the European Commission's Consultation on a Future Data Act. Retrieved 2 August, 2022, from

44. Shaw, J.A., Sethi, N. & Cassel, C.K. (2020) Social license for the use of big data in the COVID-19 era. npj Digit. Med. 3, 128.

45. Stephenson, N., Smith, C. & Vajdic, C.M. (2022) Health and public sector data sharing requires social licence negotiations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 46: 426-428.

46. Tzanou, M. (2022) Modern Servitude and Vulnerable Social Groups: The Problem of the AI Datafication of Poor People and Women. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 41 (2): 105-108,

47. Van Eechoud, M. & van der Wal, B. (2008) Creative commons licensing for public sector information Opportunities and pitfalls. IVIR. Retrieved 1 June, 2022, from

48. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science 36(1), 1-10.

49. Vezyridis, P., & Timmons, S. (2021) E-infrastructures and the divergent assetization of public health data: Expectations, uncertainties, and asymmetries. Social Studies of Science, 51(4), 606-627. doi:10.1177/0306312721989818

50. Vezyridis, P., & Timmons, S. (2017) Understanding the conundrum: New information flows for economic growth. Big Data and Society, 4(1) doi:10.1177/2053951716688490

51. Waind, E. (2020) Trust, security and public interest: Striking the balance a narrative review of previous literature on public attitudes towards the sharing, linking and use of administrative data for research. International Journal of Population Data Science, 5(3) doi:10.23889/IJPDS.V5I3.1368

Governmental/legal documents

Communication from the European Commission COM(2022) 196/2 - "A European Health Data Space: harnessing the power of health data for people, patients and innovation" -

Regulation EU 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation of 2016) -

The Australian Government Data Availability and Transparency Act (DAT Act, 2022) -

The EU Data Act (2022) -

The European Strategy for Data (2022) -

The UK Government Licensing Framework (2016) -

The UK Information Communication Office's "Data sharing across the public sector: the Digital Economy Act codes" – (accessed September 1, 2022)



Back to top