Land and Buildings Transaction Tax - property investment funds: consultation
This consultation seeks views on three specific issues focussed on the interaction between investment funds and LBTT including Co-ownership Authorised Contractual Schemes, Reserved Investor Funds and Seeding Relief.
Closed
This consultation closed 5 September 2025.
View this consultation on consult.gov.scot, including responses once published.
Questions
Part 1 – Co-ownership Authorised Contractual Schemes
Q1 - In your view, do the clauses as drafted work as intended to prevent an LBTT liability arising on the transfer of units within the CoACS?
Q2 – The draft clauses rely on various definitions set out in FSMA 2000. Are these definitions suitable for transactions in land and property situated in Scotland?
Q3 – In certain circumstances, the draft legislation seeks to treat the scheme operator as the buyer for purposes of the wider LBTT framework. Do these clauses work as intended?
Q4 – Should the Scottish Government consider amendments to the draft clauses to reflect any potential differences between Scots Law and property law elsewhere in the UK?
Q5 – Do you have any other comments, or proposed amendments, in respect of the legislation as drafted?
Part 2 – Reserved Investor Funds
Q6 - Should the transfer of units within RIFs be exempt from LBTT? Please set out further commentary on the basis of your views.
Q7 - If yes, should the LBTT treatment replicate the SDLT treatment of treating the RIF a company and units as shares? Please set out further commentary on the basis of your views.
Q8 - Are there any aspects of the existing SDLT framework which would need to be amended if equivalent LBTT arrangements were introduced?
Q9 - Are there any alternative approaches that the Scottish Government should consider?
Q10 - What would the impact be on investment in Scottish property if equivalent LBTT arrangements were not introduced?
Part 3 – Seeding relief
Q11 - Should seeding relief be introduced under LBTT? Please set out further commentary on the basis of your response.
Q12 - If yes, should the relief replicate that in place under SDLT?
Q13 - Are there any aspects of the SDLT framework which would need to be amended if equivalent LBTT arrangements were introduced?
Q14 - Are there any alternative approaches that the Scottish Government should consider?
Q15 - What would the impact be on investment in Scottish property if equivalent LBTT arrangements were not introduced?
Q16 - Should the Scottish Government consider bespoke seeding arrangements for any of the investment vehicles discussed in this consultation?
Q17 - If seeding relief is introduced in Scotland, should a different approach be taken to withdrawal of relief?
Part 4 - Addressing Tax Avoidance Risks
Q18 – Are amendments required to the draft legislation to ensure the exemption does not go beyond its’ intended scope – i.e. solely exempting the exchange of units within the scheme?
Q19 - If equivalent RIF arrangements are introduced under LBTT, is it appropriate to mirror the current SDLT safeguards?
Q20 - Should any specific or bespoke provisions be considered for the RIF framework under LBTT?
Q21 – in order to prevent artificial enveloping of properties, should the Scottish Government consider providing for seeding relief in respect of non-residential property only?
Q22 – Are there any other avoidance risks the Scottish Government should consider in respect of seeding relief?
Contact
Email: devolvedtaxes@gov.scot