Long Term Empty Properties and Second Homes
Councils classify some properties in their area as long term empty, unoccupied, or second homes for the purposes of calculating council tax liabilities. These statuses impact on the council tax through exemptions for unoccupied properties, discounts for second homes and some long term empty properties, or a levy for some long term empty properties. As a result information on the numbers of such properties is sourced from council tax statistics. It is collected annually from local authorities and is available for:
- Unoccupied Exemptions: generally properties which are empty and unfurnished for less than 6 months and exempt from paying council tax.
- Long Term Empty Properties: properties which have been empty for more than 6 months and are liable for council tax.
- Second Homes: homes which are furnished and lived in for at least 25 days in a 12 month period but not as someone's main residence.
Empty properties are of particular interest as they can help increase the supply of occupied housing in Scotland when brought back into use.
There are several factors that can impact on the number of long term empty properties and second homes that are counted through the council tax statistics including changes to council tax liability policy and management information systems.
Regarding policy changes, from 1st April 2013, local authorities gained the discretionary power to remove the council tax discount associated with long term empty properties or to set a council tax increase of up to 100% on certain properties which have been empty for 12 months or more. Prior to April 2017, second homes were entitled to a council tax discount of between 10% and 50%, and as of April 2017, local authorities were also given the option to remove the council tax discount on second homes. For 2018-19, 19 out of the 32 local authorities had removed the council tax discount on second homes and all other local authorities had opted for a 10% discount on second homes.
Management information systems can also have an impact on how properties are recorded. In addition, there have also been some improvements in the data held by some local authorities leading to the reclassification of a number of properties between the long term empty and second home categories. These changes should be kept in mind when comparing the numbers in recent years.
The latest figures, for September 2018, show that there were 24,907 second homes, 45,485 unoccupied exemptions which have generally been empty and unfurnished for less than 6 months, and 39,110 long term empty properties that had been empty for more than 6 months. Of those that had been empty for more than 6 months, over half (24,471 or 63%) had been empty for over 12 months, and of those 15,151 had a council tax discount below 10% or a council tax increase applied under the new powers described above.
Chart 13: Long Term Empty Properties, Second Homes and Unoccupied Exemptions, 2005 to 2018
Chart 13 above shows that, since 2005, the number of long term empty properties has generally been on the rise, having more than doubled over this period, however some of the rises in 2013 to 2015 will be due to the reclassification of some properties in the light of the new powers described above. There has been a slight decrease between 2015 and 2016, but an increase since then for 2018. The number of second homes has remained more steady until recently, with the reductions in 2013 to 2016 also likely to be at least partly due to reclassification. The number of unoccupied exemptions has remained relatively steady since 2005, aside from a slight increase in 2008.
After a decrease between 2005 and 2006 the total number of long term empty properties and second homes increased from 52,823 in 2006 to 66,053 in 2012 (13,230 dwellings or 24%). It has since fallen to 59,763 in 2014 before increasing to 64,017 in 2018 (with a slight peak of 63,736 in 2015). This is an increase in the last year of 1,222 properties (2%). However, this change over time should be interpreted with some caution; increases and decreases can be caused in part by reclassification exercises which local authorities carry out from time to time, or issues with management information systems, rather than real changes in numbers of properties.
Email: Felix Palin
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback