Financial transparency and profit limitation in children's residential care: consultation analysis

Report produced by external analysts on the results from the financial transparency and profit limitation in children's residential care consultation.


Annex 2: Question response rates

Question Organisations (out of 23) Individuals (out of 8) Total (out of 31)
Q1: Do you agree that the provisions outlined should cover both children’s residential care home services and residential schools provided by persons other than a local authority? (Yes / No) 18 (78%) 8 (100%) 26 (84%)
Q1: Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 6 (75%) 23 (74%)
Q2: Do you agree that both Not-for-Profit and Private services should be included in these proposals? (Yes / No) 19 (83%) 7 (88%) 26 (84%)
Q2: Can you give reasons for this? 19 (83%) 6 (75%) 25 (81%)
Q2: Is there anyone else we would need to capture? 11 (48%) 6 (75%) 17 (55%)
Q3: Should the Bill provisions also cover other services such as secure care? (Yes / No) 19 (83%) 8 (100%) 27 (87%)
Q3: Can you give reasons for this? 19 (83%) 6 (75%) 25 (81%)
Q4: Do you agree with the proposal to increase financial transparency? (Yes / No) 18 (78%) 8 (100%) 26 (84%)
Q4: Can you give reasons for this? 19 (83%) 7 (88%) 26 (84%)
Q5: What implications will financial transparency have on the different types and sizes of residential children’s homes? 18 (78%) 7 (88%) 25 (81%)
Q6: How could we minimise any negative impacts you have outlined above? Please explain your answer. 16 (70%) 7 (88%) 23 (74%)
Q7: In order to cause the least impact to businesses, what format do you believe the financial transparency request should take? e.g. audited annual accounts or a more detailed version of the information captured in forms such as those provided to SXL or CI. Please explain your answer. 18 (78%) 7 (88%) 25 (81%)
Q8: What explanatory information would you want to provide alongside the financial information collected to demonstrate the ways in which the finances are structured? e.g. additional funds being saved to open a new home. Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 6 (75%) 23 (74%)
Q9: Do you agree that the information should be provided at individual service level, provider level and at parent/associated company level? Please explain your answer. 19 (83%) 6 (75%) 25 (81%)
Q10: Is there any additional information that the Scottish Government should be collecting that is not included in the proposal above? Please explain your answer. 15 (65%) 5 (63%) 20 (65%)
Q11: Would it be useful to use the financial information collected to watch for potential market failure? (Yes / No) 16 (70%) 8 (100%) 24 (77%)
Q11: Can you give reasons for this? 16 (70%) 6 (75%) 22 (71%)
Q12: Do you agree with the proposed measures outlined above? (Yes / No) 18 (78%) 8 (100%) 26 (84%)
Q12: Could you give reasons for your answer? 20 (87%) 5 (63%) 25 (81%)
Q13: How would you define profit for these purposes? Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 6 (75%) 23 (74%)
Q14: Could this impact a residential childcare service’s ability to meet their aims/function and objectives? Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 5 (63%) 22 (71%)
Q15: What challenges would services face in trying to reduce profit/surplus and how could this be supported? Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 4 (50%) 21 (68%)
Q16: What impacts could these provisions have, both positive and negative, on providing the best care for Children and Young People? Please explain your answer. 17 (74%) 4 (50%) 21 (68%)
Q17: Do you have any comments on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment? Please explain your answer. 15 (65%) 6 (75%) 21 (68%)
Q18: Do you have any other comments on the residential childcare proposals in the Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill? Please explain your answer. 20 (87%) 5 (63%) 25 (81%)

Note: Closed questions are indicated with “(Yes / No)”. All other questions are open.

Contact

Email: ChildrensResidentialCare@gov.scot

Back to top