Attainment Scotland Fund - 2022 to 2026: evaluation strategy

Annex B - Attainment Scotland Fund Evaluation Questions Mapped to Outcome Areas

Inputs

1. Governance

What worked well and what could be improved in the national and local governance and support with implementation of the refreshed SAC?

2. Funding

What funding was allocated through the SAC Refresh ASF to schools and LA's, to what extent was it used within funds requirements and/or supplemented with other funding sources? What were stakeholders views on the implementation of the new funding structure introduced with the SAC refresh?

Activities & Outputs

3. Implementation

How did local authorities implement the Strategic Equity Fund alongside PEF and CECYP?

4. Approaches

How do the approaches for equity support pupils (and parents) from the most socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds?

5. Monitoring and evaluation

How are schools and local authorities monitoring, refining and evaluating their approaches to address the poverty-related attainment gap?

Short-term outcomes / Medium-term outcomes

6. Collaboration

To what extent has the Fund resulted in established and/or strategic collaborations, and what has been the impact?

7. Data and evidence

To what extent have schools and authorities embedded use of data, analysis and evidence to drive improvements as part of the fund?

8. Engagement with and support for families and communities

To what extent has the fund embedded engagement with and support for families and communities?

9. Perceptions of local impact

To what extent did schools, local authorities and other stakeholders, including pupils, families and communities feel there had been progress towards achieving outcomes?

10. Unintended consequences

Did the changes to the funding structure with the refreshed SAC have any unintended consequences?

11. Approaches

To what extent was there awareness of and use of evidence based approaches and to what extent were approaches embedded in the system, refined and adapted based on effective interventions in the local context?

12. Engagement in decision-making (Voice)

To what extent was there improvement in children and young people's readiness to learn through focusing on engagement, attendance, confidence and wellbeing?

13. Readiness to learn

To what extent was there improvement in children and young people's readiness to learn through focusing on engagement, attendance, confidence and wellbeing?

14. Culture and ethos

To what extent was culture and ethos based on education equity embedded in the education system that promotes high aspirations and recognises broader achievement for all children and young people and their families.

Long-term outcomes

15. Closing the gap/educational outcomes

To what extent did the fund contribute to a closing of the attainment gap between the most and least socio-economically disadvantaged children and young people, in line with stretch aims?

16. Achievement

To what extent did the fund contribute to an education system which encourages, reflects and values the breadth of achievements that contribute to improved outcomes for children and young people.

17. Embedded practices and culture

To what extent did the fund contribute to an embedded culture of equity at different levels of the education system?

18. Education system

To what extent did the fund contribute to an education system which actively addresses poverty, removing barriers through inclusive ethos, practice and approaches for children and young people, parents and carers and practitioners?