Draft circular economy strategy: consultation

We are consulting on the draft circular economy strategy for Scotland.

Open
67 days to respond
Respond online


Appendix 3: Indicator selection process and criteria Monitoring and Indicator Framework Development Process

As a starting point, a broad range of Circular Economy (CE) indicators with potential for application within a Scottish CE indicator framework were identified. This ‘long list’ was collated based on reviewing CE indicators from existing Scottish Government frameworks including:

  • The Environment Strategy for Scotland: vision and outcomes[71]
  • The Climate Change Plan 2018-2032 – update[72]
  • National Performance Framework[73]
  • Scotland’s Natural Capital Index[74]
  • Wellbeing economy monitor[75]

Indicators were also collated from frameworks used internationally by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),[76] Eurostat CE Monitoring Framework,[77] the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE),[78] Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE)[79] and individual countries. In total, over 170 potential indicators were identified and collated in an initial long list as the basis for selecting the most relevant indicators for application in a Scottish context. Each indicator was linked to one or more relevant circular economy outcomes.

Following the long listing stage, a set of indicator selection criteria (appendix 3) was developed and applied to the long list. Each indicator was given a rating of "Low," "Moderate," or "High" for each criterion. The criteria were:

1. data availability;

2. relevance to CE outcomes;

3. distinctiveness;

4. validity;

5. timescales/sensitivity; and

6. understanding.

The development of the indicator framework was led by a delivery team which included staff from Scottish Government policy (Circular Economy), Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division, and Zero Waste Scotland. A Working Group was also established, with representatives from various Scottish Government policy teams, analytical teams, Zero Waste Scotland, NatureScot, and Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). The Delivery Team reported to, and obtained feedback from, the Working Group at key stages, to facilitate communication between key stakeholders across the Scottish Government and relevant public bodies. The Delivery Team also reported to the Scottish Circular Economy and Resources Programme Board. Further internal engagement has also been undertaken with a broader set of policy teams, public bodies and key stakeholders (e.g. SEPA), on the proposed indicators. A UK-wide Analytical Group has also been established to ensure coherence and facilitate knowledge sharing and joint working on circular economy where appropriate. In addition, a workshop was held with relevant academics and non-governmental organisations in July 2025 to obtain initial feedback on the draft framework.

Indicator Selection Criteria - Stage 1

Selection Criterion (Stage 1)

High

Medium

Low

Data availability - the extent to which data for the indicator is readily available and accessible for use by wide range of stakeholders. This criterion also considers practicality of obtaining and working with the data - i.e. the extent to which an indicator can be measured in a cost-effective and practical manner.

Data at required frequency is available for Scotland/UK and other countries and no significant resources are required to obtain it. High degree of cost-efficiency (e.g. regular data collection mechanisms are in place or can be developed with reasonable costs).

There are some gaps in data (e.g. in terms of frequency or geographical coverage thus not allowing for international comparisons) but that data is still readily available. Not unreasonable costs and a moderate effort required to put in place appropriate data collection mechanisms.

Data is not available or there are significant time or geographical coverage gaps in the data. Disproportionately high costs and other practical barriers.

Relevance to CE Outcome(s) - the extent to which there is a clear relationship between an indicator and CE Outcome(s).

Indicator is completely relevant with a clear, unambiguous relationship to CE Outcome(s).

Indicator is broadly relevant and acceptable but lacks direct relationship to CE Outcome(s) in some ways.

Insufficient relationship between CE Outcome(s) and the indicator.

Distinctiveness - the extent to which an indicator measures something already captured under other indicator(s).

Indicator is completely distinctive and it doesn't measure anything already captured under other indicator(s).

Broad overlap between the indicator and other indicator(s) in the list but there are clear differences when it comes to details of what they measure.

Indicator is a duplicate or a near-duplicate and it is not clear how the indicator would enhance the monitoring of CE Outcome(s).

Stage 2

Selection Criterion Stage 2

High

Medium

Low

Validity - the extent to which an indicator measures what it is supposed to measure.

The indicator is robust and statistically validated, based on agreed definitions, classifications, standards and best practices, and methodology behind it is well-documented.

Gaps in any of these features but a broadly acceptable standard.

The indicator is generally poor, ambiguous and of limited robustness.

Timescales/sensitivity - the extent to which an indicator is sensitive enough to detect changes over time, particular in relation to the lifespan of the CEMIF.

Indicator is responsive to changes over time, in particular to relevant policy interventions.

Would expect the indicator to reflect changes to a reasonable extent but they may take longer time to manifest themselves or may be influenced by a wide number of factors beyond CE.

Would anticipate to see little to no change in the indicators within the timeframe of the CEMIF.

Understanding - the extent to which an indicator is easy to understand for policy-makers, the general public and other stakeholders.

Indicator is straightforward, unambiguous and easy to understand for non-technical audiences.

Includes an acceptable degree of complexity.

A generally poor and ambiguous or overly complex indicator that is likely to be hard for policy-makers and general public to understand.

Contact

Email: circulareconomy@gov.scot

Back to top