Building regulations - proposed review of fire safety topics: analysis of responses

9. Conclusions

Individuals and organisations with detailed knowledge and varied experiences participated in the consultation, sharing their views on a proposed review of fire safety topics, including recommendations from the Cameron House Hotel FAI. The proposals addressed fire safety regulations in various potential buildings, including conversions of traditional buildings to hotels, boarding houses and hostels.

There was majority support for many of the proposals presented in the consultation. Respondents felt the proposals could enhance public safety in relevant buildings and assist fire and rescue services. The importance of having clear guidance to assist stakeholders, such as those involved in construction, verification and fire rescue, was emphasised throughout the consultation. While many respondents explained why they agreed or disagreed with the proposals, other aspects or considerations respondents felt should be addressed were often highlighted at each question.

Majority support was evident for mandating active fire suppression in certain buildings to address the special risks these presented, with occupant safety being seen as a key benefit. Factors relating to the conversion of traditional buildings were also highlighted. Introducing a clear definition of ‘hotel’ based on building size and complexity was welcomed to help determine which buildings would need suppression systems.

Varying levels of support and a range of views were expressed on proposals for other specific fire safety regulations. Respondents supported proposals to retain existing guidance, amend wording and propose revisions to the regulations and guidance, with recommendations made for aspects to include or consider. Most proposals were supported by a majority of respondents, particularly the requirement for certain buildings to display an external wall plate. Proposals to undertake further research and gather evidence on BS 476, battery energy storage systems and car parks and electric vehicles were also supported.

The proposals were felt to impact businesses more than other stakeholders, for instance, due to perceived increased costs or potential impacts on the workforce. Potential positive impacts on older, vulnerable or disabled people or for those in remote, rural areas were also noted. Respondents agreed with the suggested timeline, though calls were made for sufficient lead-in time to allow stakeholders time to prepare for implementation.

Alongside other evidence, the consultation responses provide valuable and informative evidence for the Scottish Government to draw upon when finalising their proposals.