SG/2026/56: Reform of the Victim Notification Scheme: report for Parliament - March 2026

ANNEX Summary of position on VNS review recommendations

All section numbers are those in the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Act 2025

Recommendation 1

Considerable attention should be given to devising meaningful objectives and targets across the delivery of the VNS, which clearly relate to its purpose. There should be a common currency for targets, to include a focus on improvement, user satisfaction and well-being.

Scottish Government position in response - Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 2

Mental health cases should come within the ambit of performance reporting to provide a full picture. We recommend the inclusion of reporting data on the handling of mental health cases in the Performance Report.

Scottish Government position in response - Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 44

Recommendation 3

Work should be done to identify the key data for the VNS, to identify overall how efficient and effective VNS performance is and to ensure it is readily available to managers of the Scheme to continuously improve it and ensure it genuinely meets its purpose and serves victims as intended. User feedback should be included. This should be the key information in the published performance report by each of the agencies involved.

Scottish Government position in response - Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 4

Recommend the Witness Portal work and the Single Point of Contact work arising from the Victims Taskforce VCA Workstream include provision for straightforward access to the VNS for victims.

Scottish Government position in response - Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 5

Recommend that SPS and COPFS jointly look at how the confirmation procedure might be streamlined.

Scottish Government position in response - Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 6

In the case of victims of offenders sentenced to under 18 months, we would hope this could be done centrally via a COPFS database, rather than an SPS official needing to contact an individual sentencing court.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in section 35

Recommendation 7

We recommend that unless there are exceptionally overriding circumstances, any rejection of a victim’s application should be explained to them.

Scottish Government position in response – To note

Current position – No further action required

Recommendation 8(a)

Consideration should be given to reviewing the information entitlements of registered victims in these circumstances [transfers into and out of Scotland].

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in sections 43 and 45

Recommendation 8(b)

“No Order Made” should be added to the list in Section 16C [of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003].

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 47

Recommendation 8(c)

Consideration should be given to adding appeals [against conditional discharge] and the outcome of appeals to the list of information entitlements.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 46

Recommendation 8(d)

These provisions [on conditions of conditional discharge relevant to victim] need to be clarified and relevant advice made available to registered victims.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 48

Recommendation 8(e)

Provision is needed for informing victims of appeals against recall to hospital or the outcome of such an appeal in these circumstances [where an appeal is made against decision to recall a patient].

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 47

Recommendation 8(f)

It is recommended that an amendment be made to allow victims to be notified of the first occasion of unescorted suspension of detention outwith hospital grounds.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Regulation-making power taken in section 42

Recommendation 8(g)

The review heard from victims that being told of a decision but not what the decision was is frustrating and stressful. Consideration should be given to what information can be provided and when information cannot be provided, the reasons for that explained.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Regulation-making power taken in section 42

Recommendation 8(h)

Registration forms should be reviewed and updated to ensure victims can opt to receive all the information to which they are entitled. Guidance for all victims needs to highlight the information entitlements that can only be met if registered with the VNS. This again highlights the need for an easier way for victims to navigate this system.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 8(i)

In these circumstances, we recommend that victims are told formally that they will stop receiving information when the earliest date of liberation is reached for those reasons [that disclosure of a health condition would be a breach of privacy].

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in section 41

Recommendation 9

A process should be devised to extend the VNS to include young offenders in secure care and young mentally disordered offenders.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in section 37

An interim process has been established by the Scottish Government to extend the VNS to cases involving children convicted on indictment under Section 205 or 208 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 and placed in secure care. This ensures that eligible victims in these cases can receive information in a way that is consistent with the wider VNS. This temporary process follows the same standards and approach as the broader VNS, ensuring consistency in communication and overall victim experience. Through this arrangement, registered victims continue to receive relevant updates while broader reforms to the VNS are developed. This interim process will remain in place until the new statutory VNS provisions come into force, at which point the permanent arrangements will replace it.

Secure care is a highly regulated, locked residential setting for children and young people under 18 who require intensive support and intervention. It provides a safe and controlled environment where staff can address the young person’s risks and needs while ensuring the safety of the child and the wider community.

Under the interim process, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) identifies eligible victims after sentencing and invites them to register for the scheme. If a victim chooses to register, the Scottish Government’s Education and Justice Directorate manages the case and provides the necessary information for as long as the child offender remains in secure care. If the offender’s sentence continues beyond their 18th birthday, and responsibility for their detention transfers to the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), responsibility for administering the VNS also transfers to SPS.

Recommendation 10

We recommend that victim notification procedures for victims in Scotland regarding prisoners and patients who may be transferred around the United Kingdom be reviewed, with a view to establishing appropriate protocols, supported by legislation if required. This review should also consider the notification of disclosable information concerning the deportation of foreign nationals.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in sections 40 and 43

Recommendation 11

We recommend that the considered exercise of discretion be extended to the table above, to reflect the reality of relationships on a case-by-case basis. This should not be taken as suggesting a wide relaxation of the criteria. There should be a general aim of limiting the victim’s eligibility to up to four relatives, but there is a need to allow discretion to reflect real circumstances rather than a traditional family tree hierarchy. Doing so would also support a trauma-informed and personalised approach. Once a genuine interest has been established, rejecting an application on grounds of the application of eligibility rules should only occur in the most exceptional circumstances.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in section 36 and Schedule 1

Recommendation 12

We recommend that victims are allowed to formally nominate one person to receive information on their behalf.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in section 39

Recommendation 13

Any proposed reforms to the VNS with regard to children should be accompanied by a children’s rights impact assessment.

Scottish Government position in response – To note

Current position – No further action required

Recommendation 14

We have concluded that children over the age of 12 should have the ability to authorise an adult to act on their behalf in the light of the UNCRC and ICO considerations above, that children over the age of 12 should be treated on a case-by-case basis according to their capacity and choice where appropriate and given the opportunity to appoint an appropriate adult to receive information on their behalf, if they wish.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Provision made in sections 38 and 39

We recommend that there should be a clearly laid-out process for establishing how a young person over the age of 12 should register, including how, where and when appropriate advice may be given, and safeguards to confirm any decision is proportionate and well-informed.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 38

Recommendation 15

We recommend that for sentences under 18 months, notification criteria be extended to include death in custody and transfer outwith Scotland.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 35

We recommend that in any instance of temporary release, where the offender might come into close proximity with the victim, that notification be made and that the ‘first release only’ provision be amended.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – regulation-making power taken in section 42

Recommendation 16

We recommend that where there is a VNS flag in respect of an offender, the VNS agencies and the MAPPA policy team should work together to address the anomaly of non-disclosure of relevant information to the safety planning partnership.

Scottish Government position in response – To note

Current position – No further action required

Recommendation 17

Having carefully considered the arguments, we have concluded that a solution to many of the currently perceived shortfalls of the process could best be addressed by the adoption of a system of automatic referral of all eligible victims. All victims meeting the current criteria for registration with the VNS should be systematically identified and their details passed to a suitably qualified team of contact officers within a prescribed time limit. Having received these details, the team would make personal contact with the victim (again within a prescribed time limit to ensure timely engagement) to explain the process, invite registration or, if the victim chooses not to do so, set a time to make further contact with the victim later to check the victim’s wishes or needs had not altered. This allows for the personal communication with the victim, opportunities to answer questions or explain, to offer choice to the victim relating to their needs and wishes and, above all, flexibility.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 43

Recommendation 18

For any system to be truly trauma-informed, the victim should be offered a readily accessible menu of means of staying in touch, so they choose what is best for them and they can alter their choice when they need to. Victim’s needs will change over time and the system should reflect this.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

We recommend delivery partners each clarify their GDPR procedures to ensure that restrictions are not applied unnecessarily with regard to use of email, records retention policies and sharing information with relevant partners.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

There are also occasions when notifications arrive on anniversaries, such as a birthday or date of the sentence. This causes particular distress. We noted that in New Zealand and other international jurisdictions, efforts are made specifically to avoid this unnecessary distress and this should also be adopted by the Scottish system.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree in principle

Current position – Work ongoing

Recommendation 19

We recommend that a review be undertaken of all the official websites giving details of the VNS, to rationalise VNS information into one common format in clear, concise, consistent and accessible language. Ideally, there should be one single website and one phone number / email address for victims to contact. Information should not be confined to script. We recommend also that visual information is available on one main website, containing videos and graphics for example, be produced alongside for those who prefer visual media. Mainstream platforms, such as YouTube, could also be considered.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Work ongoing through Justice Digital Front Door Project

Recommendation 20

We recommend that a new victim contact team, managed by or accountable to the Justice Directorate, be established, to sit outside the delivery organisations but work closely with them and the victim support organisations, to provide a personalised service for victims.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 43

Recommendation 21

This [victim contact] team should receive automatic referrals from COPFS for victims, where there has been a custodial sentence or Compulsion Order and Restriction Order, within a target period and make personal contact with the victim within another specified target period. The team should offer enrolment within the VNS, provide information on the process and their rights and entitlements. They should offer a choice of future communication, including how to opt out of any information not desired and the right to re-enrol at any time of their choice. The team should be managed centrally by or accountable to the Justice Directorate of the Scottish Government and be made up of suitably trained and skilled operatives and be able to operate across all the interested delivery agencies with appropriate data sharing protocols.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Provision made in section 43

Recommendation 22

Diversity monitoring should be adopted to check on accessibility and progress.

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Work ongoing

Where information given is likely to cause anxiety, confusion or an emotional response, we recommend that such information be given orally where possible. We have further recommended that information be available in a variety of accessible forms, including the visual (recommendation 19).

Scottish Government position in response – Agree

Current position – Work ongoing