Reducing Reoffending Change Fund Evaluation of Year 1 - Public Social Partnership Development

This research report outlines findings of an evaluation of Public Social Partnership development funded by Year One of the Reducing Reoffending Change Fund. It focuses on how the funding was used, and what was achieved by the partnerships in the first six months of the Fund.


Appendix 7 - Public Social Partnerships Survey Results

Rationale and Goals

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
Our partnership has a clear vision 11% 6% 83% 54
Partners were involved in developing the vision 13% 7% 80% 55
Partners understand the purpose of the partnership 13% 2% 85% 55

Set up

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
A range of activities took place as part of the PSP development 7% 5% 88% 56
The activities were well attended and relevant 9% 14% 77% 56
The activities were successful and boosted partnership development 9% 20% 71% 56

Partnership Working

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
The right partners are on the PSP 7% 9% 84% 56
Partners are treated equally 14% 21% 64% 56
Support is available to maintain or achieve equality 7% 31% 61% 54

Impact

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
The PSP will have a positive impact on the quality of services being developed 2% 16% 82% 55
We will be able to identify the social benefit we deliver 4% 16% 80% 55
We will be able to prove the social benefit we deliver 5% 18% 76% 55

Learning

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
We have processes in place to capture learning 6% 24% 70% 54
We have identified barriers and enablers to delivery 9% 15% 76% 54
We have modified our partnership through learning 11% 26% 63% 54

Roles and responsibilities

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
Our PSP has set out clear roles and responsibilities for partners 6% 13% 81% 52
These roles build on individual partner strengths 12% 12% 77% 52
Governance is strong and accountable 10% 23% 67% 52

Sustainability

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
The PSP has adequately considered how it will maintain services beyond March 2015 17% 27% 56% 52
I am confident the services will be maintained by public sector partners beyond March 2015 if the outcomes are met 17% 29% 54% 52
The PSP has met my expectations and I would be part of a PSP again 10% 21% 69% 52

Communication

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
Our PSP meets regularly to a firm agenda 11% 13% 75% 53
Our meetings are minuted 8% 25% 68% 53
Information is shared among partners 6% 11% 83% 53

Service User Involvement

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
Service users have been involved in the PSP 6% 15% 79% 52
Service user involvement is valued by other partners 2% 10% 88% 51
Service user involvement has had a positive impact on the PSP 10% 18% 73% 51

Trust

Question Strongly disagree or Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree or Agree N
There is trust among partners 10% 17% 73% 52
Meetings are open and encourage dialogue 8% 4% 88% 52
Our vision is understood and shared by all partners 6% 17% 77% 52

Contact

Email: Carole Edwards

Back to top