Public Value and Participation: A Literature Review for the Scottish Government

This paper provides a brief account of the theory of public value and outlines how public participation can contribute to the process of authorising what public managers do, establishing priorities and decision making and measuring the performance of public organisations.


ANNEX TWO PARTICIPATION TECHNIQUES USED BY SCOTTISH PUBLIC AUTHORITIES 2000

Table 2.4 Use of Public Participation Techniques by Scottish Public Authorities (Percentage use)

Base = 126 respondents

LAs

SIPs*

Health Board

Working for Communities
Pathfinders

Local Enterprise
Company

Housing Association

All Respondents

High Levels of Use (%)

Links with community groups

97

85

100

100

85

91

91

Open/public meetings

97

73

100

100

92

91

88

Local newsletters

84

75

80

100

85

100

84

Exhibitions

91

63

100

75

92

73

79

Focus groups

81

63

100

100

85

73

77

Surveys

94

73

87

100

100

95

87

Variable Levels of use (%)

Users Comments & complaints

97

65

87

50

100

100

85

Written consultation

97

80

93

75

100

59

84

Workshops

94

80

93

100

100

55

83

Pilot initiatives

78

73

53

75

92

55

71

Staff suggestion schemes

63

30

80

25

85

73

57

Depth interviews

63

45

53

50

77

27

51

IT (internet; kiosks)

63

35

67

50

77

14

47

Low Levels of Use (%)

Mystery shopping

19

8

7

0

46

0

13

Deliberative polling

16

8

7

50

8

5

10

Freephone no. for comments

44

13

40

0

38

14

26

Citizens' Panels

41

10

27

25

31

14

23

Citizens' Juries

16

5

13

0

8

0

8

Other (eg Planning for Real, Open Space,
Business Panels, Public Surgeries)

22

23

13

0

15

9

17

Source: Adapted from George Street Research, 2000
*Social Inclusion Partnerships were replaced by the Community Regeneration Fund initiative in 2005

Back to top