# Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland 2011/12

Statistics on the percentage and number of children, working age adults and pensioners living in low income households in Scotland, and the distribution of household income across Scotland.

### Chapter 3: Income Inequality and the distribution of income

The tables and charts in this section provide information about income inequality, the distribution of income and the types of families which are most common at the top and bottom of the income distribution.

Deciles / decile points:

Deciles (or decile points) are the income values which divide the Scotland population, when ranked by income, into ten equal-sized groups. Therefore nine decile points are needed in order to form the ten groups. Decile is also often used as a shorthand term for decile group; for example 'the bottom decile' is used to describe the bottom ten per cent of the income distribution.

Decile groups:

These are groups of the population defined by the decile points. The lowest decile group is the ten per cent of the population with the lowest incomes. The second decile group contains individuals with incomes above the lowest decile point but below the second decile point.

The following chart and table present figures that relate to the Scottish Government's Solidarity Purpose Target which is "to increase overall income and the proportion of income earned by the three lowest income deciles as a group by 2017": http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Performance/scotPerforms/purpose/solidarity

Chart 6 shows the percentage of total income received by the three lowest income deciles (the thirty per cent of the population with the lowest incomes), from 1998/99 to 2011/12. It also shows the percentage of total income received by the three highest income deciles. This is a measure of how equally income is distributed across the population.

Chart 6: Percentage of total equivalised income going to the bottom and top three income deciles, 1998-99 - 2011-12

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP.

Main points:

• In 2011/12, the percentage of income received by those in the bottom 3 deciles was 14%, the same as 2010/11.
• Having dropped from 54 per cent to 51 per cent between 2009/10 and 2010/11, the percentage of income received by those in the top three income deciles increased slightly in 2011/12 to 52 per cent.
• There has been no significant change in income inequality between 2010/11 and 2011/12.
• Over the longer term it can be seen that there has been very little change in income inequality since 1998/99, with the percentage of income received by the bottom 3 deciles remaining at between 13 and 14 per cent.

3.1 Income thresholds

Most of the income figures in this publication are based on equivalised income. One consequence of the equivalisation process is that there are different poverty thresholds for households of different sizes and compositions. To help readers understand the figures in this publication, the following table presents some commonly used income thresholds, before equivalisation, for families of different sizes.

Table 1 - Income thresholds for different family types (income after tax and BHC)

 Single person with no children Couple with no children Single person with children aged 5 and 14 Couple with children aged 5 and 14 weekly annual weekly annual 286 14,900 427 22,300 513 26,700 654 34,100 292 15,200 436 22,700 523 27,300 667 34,800 172 9,000 256 13,400 308 16,000 392 20,500 177 9,200 264 13,800 317 16,500 404 21,000 156 8,100 233 12,100 279 14,600 356 18,600 194 10,100 290 15,100 347 18,100 443 23,100 223 11,700 333 17,400 400 20,900 510 26,600 255 13,300 381 19,900 457 23,800 582 30,400 292 15,200 436 22,700 523 27,300 667 34,800 330 17,200 493 25,700 591 30,800 754 39,300 379 19,800 566 29,500 679 35,400 865 45,100 438 22,900 654 34,100 785 40,900 1001 52,200 545 28,400 813 42,400 975 50,900 1244 64,800

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP. Note: To create ten decile groups only nine decile points are needed to split the population.

Main points:

• The relative poverty (BHC) threshold in 2011/12 is equivalent to £172 per week for a single person with no children; £256 for a couple with no children; or £392 per week for a couple with one young and one older child.
• A couple with no children with a combined income of over £34,100 (after tax) would be in the highest income 20 per cent of the population.

3.2 Trends in income distributions

Chart 7 shows how the median equivalised household income in Scotland has changed from 1998/99 to 2011/12.

Chart 7: Median equivalised weekly household income in Scotland: 1998/99 to 2011/12 (in placed 2011/12 prices)

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP. These figures are also presented in Annex 1 (Table A6).

Main points:

• There was a gradual increase in median equivalised weekly household income (BHC) in Scotland from £378 in 1998/99 to £461 in 2009/10 followed by a fall to £437 in 2010/11. Median income in 2011/12 fell slightly to £436 per week. All incomes are quoted in 2011/12 prices.
• The pattern is similar for median equivalised weekly household income (AHC) in Scotland, which was £322 in 1998/99 increasing to £416 in 2009/10, followed by a fall to £391 in 2010/11. However, median income AHC continued to drop in 2011/12 to £383.

Chart 8 shows how the weekly equivalised incomes have changed from 2007/08 to 2011/12 across the different income decile points.

Chart 8: Equivalised weekly household incomes (Before Housing Costs) for each decile point from 2007/08 to 2011/12 (in 2011/12 prices) - Scotland

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP. These figures are also presented in Annex 1 (Table A7).

Main points:

• Between 2007/08 and 2009/10, equivalised weekly household income in Scotland increased in real terms across all the income decile points except the 8th.
• In 2010/11, there was a drop in equivalised weekly household incomes in all but the bottom two income decile points. This is linked to the drop in average earnings.
• All deciles saw a slight decrease in 2011/12, in particular the top 4 deciles and deciles 3 and 4. The median (decile 5) recorded the smallest change between 2010/11 and 2011/12.
• Households in the bottom two deciles receive a greater proportion of their income from benefits and a smaller proportion from earnings. From April 2011, benefits were uprated by CPI instead of RPI, with the exception of the Basic State Pension which was uprated by RPI. This means incomes in the bottom deciles (where households are more likely to be benefit dependent) also recorded small decreases in real income between 2010/11 and 2011/12 as benefit increases were less than RPI measured inflation.

Chart 9 below shows how the distribution of income across Scotland changed between 1998/99 and 2011/12. The shaded area shows the shape of the 2011/12 income distribution, the continuous orange line for 2010/11 and the black line for 1998/99. The peak in median income in 2009/10 is also shown (£461) as median income had been increasing until then before decreasing in 2010/11. Previous year's figures are adjusted for inflation and are in 2011/12 prices.

Chart 9: Equivalised weekly household income distribution (before housing costs): Scotland - 1998/99, 2010/11 and 2011/12

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP.

Main points:

• The median equivalised weekly household income has decreased slightly from £437 per week in 2010/11 to £436 per week in 2011/12 (in 2011/12 prices).
• This follows a period of increasing median income up to 2009/10 (£461) and a subsequent decrease to present levels.
• The relative poverty threshold is based on the UK median equivalised household income. As the median income has fallen in the last two years, the poverty threshold also fell in 2010/11 and 2011/12. The UK median (£427) is used to calculate the poverty threshold in 2011/12, which is £256 per week for a couple with no children).

Chart 10 below shows the composition of family types by equivalised income decile.

Chart 10: Family type by equivalised income decile, 2011/12

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP. These figures are also presented in Annex 1 (Table A8).

Main points:

• There is a higher percentage of single people with dependent children towards the lower end of the income distribution.
• Single people without dependent children make up over 30 per cent of those in the lowest decile, and around 20 per cent in the other deciles.
• There are also more pensioners towards the lower end of the income distribution - the second, third and fourth income deciles contain the highest proportions.
• There are more couples without children towards the top end of the income distribution.

Chart 11 below shows the composition of the economic status of families by equivalised income decile.

Chart 11: Economic status of family by equivalised income decile: 2011/12

Source: HBAI dataset, DWP. These figures are also presented in Annex 1 (Table A9).

Note: The 'workless, other inactive category' would include, for example, non-working single parents, or those who cannot work due to long-term sickness or disability.

Main points:

• Families where no-one is working either through unemployment, retirement or economic inactivity (those who are neither in work, nor looking for work) are more common towards the bottom of the income distribution. 53 per cent of people in the bottom three income deciles are in families of these types compared to 13 per cent in the top three deciles. Two thirds of households in the lowest decile are households where no-one is working.
• People in families where at least one adult is working full-time (including those who are self-employed) make up 83 per cent of those in the top three deciles. Such families make up 36 per cent of those in the bottom three deciles.

### Contact

Email: Stephen Smith