Pilot whale stranding: acoustic analysis report

1. Executive Summary

This report has reviewed several acoustic information sources available around the time of the long-finned pilot whale mass stranding at Tolsta on the east of the Isle of Lewis on 16^th July 2023. This includes analysis of passive acoustic data collected at a site (Tolsta site) approximately 12.5 km offshore of the beach where the stranding occurred, and at a site on the west of the Lewis (Garenin site). Data from the week prior to, and the day of the stranding were analysed. Both broadband acoustic data and cetacean click detections were available around the time of the stranding event and were processed and visually analysed. This report seeks to provide an account of (1) the presence of cetaceans around the time of the stranding, and (2) the presence of any identified sounds from presumed anthropogenic sources. It also summarises activities that were taking place in the region at the time, that may have generated underwater noise.

At the Tolsta site, cetaceans were detected regularly throughout the analysis period on both the broadband and click detector recorders. However, these could not be attributed to specific cetacean species, except to delphinids or porpoises. A total of 1,330 unique cetacean detection events were identified throughout the analysis period in the broadband data. Shipping noise was commonly encountered at the Tolsta site, consisting of continuous narrowband signals with several harmonics extending up to 40 kHz. Impulsive sounds were found in the recordings at around 01:00 UTC and 05:00 UTC on 16th July. Impulsive sounds were not found at other times. Given the frequencies and pulse patterns of these sounds, and that they decreased in amplitude over the duration of the recording, the sounds appear to be consistent with echosounders which are commonly found on vessels throughout Scottish waters, which would decrease in amplitude if the vessel was moving away from the acoustic recorder. However, the source of the detected sounds cannot be confidently verified given the lack of vessel presence at the time in the Automatic Identification System (AIS) and Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) evidence. From the data gathered, combined with the uncertainty around the time of the stranding, it is not possible to determine whether the pilot whales were in the area to hear these sounds, or what effect they may have had on their behaviour, if they were. However, such sounds are common in the marine environment. Any inferences on potential sources of the sound and the resultant influence on the pilot whales’ behaviour and stranding must therefore be caveated and contextualised with results of pathological analysis on the individuals.

The recordings from the Garenin site on the west of Lewis included high levels of shipping noise and also cetacean detections, but at much lower levels than those seen at the Tolsta site. Other biological sounds were also recorded, including sounds that are considered likely to have been from fish such as haddock.

In reviewing activities that could have produced underwater noise, MD-SEDD approached the Ministry of Defence (MOD), which reported activity in the area. The information provided by the MOD does not suggest any obvious activity that may have been a factor in the strandings, such as the use of active sonar or explosives, which have previously been linked with cetacean strandings around the world. Activities taking place under licence included a geophysical survey at a wind farm lease area on the west of Lewis. Much of that activity was carried out at very high frequencies, well outside of pilot whale hearing ranges. Sounds from the geophysical survey were not detected in the acoustic data collected by MD-SEDD at the Garenin site.