6 The MAPPA in Operation
1 This chapter describes the process following identification and notification when a relevant offender is referred for consideration of multi-agency management at MAPPA Level 2 or Level 3. It also takes into account the Integrated Case Management (ICM) system developed by the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) for the supervision of prisoners.
2 Where an offender is subject to the Sex Offender Notification Requirements (SONR), and is also serving an Order for Lifelong Restriction (OLR) sentence, the responsible authorities will have regard to the requirements as detailed in the Standards and Guidelines for Risk Management (Risk Management Authority 2013).
Key Stages of the MAPPA
3 There are five key stages:
Stage 1 Identification of offender and notification.
Stage 2 MAPPA referral.
Stage 3 Pre-meeting information sharing.
Stage 4 MAPPA meeting.
Stage 5 Exit from MAPPA.
STAGE 1: Identification of offender and notification
4 The process and timescales for identification and notification of relevant offenders (Stage 1) is explained in full in Chapter 4 of this guidance. Stage 1 relates to all offenders who fall within the remit of the MAPPA at any particular time, regardless of the level at which they will be managed.
STAGE 2: MAPPA referral
Referral to multi-agency risk management - Level 2 or Level 3.
5 A referral to MAPPA Levels 2 or 3 must be informed by the current risk assessment and the proposed risk management plan.
Community sentence and other types of referral
6 As outlined in chapter 4 the lead responsible authority must submit a notification form to the MAPPA coordinator within three workings days of being notified of a community sentence disposal. The form must contain sufficient information to support the rationale for management at the recommended MAPPA Level. Should a decision be made to manage the offender at MAPPA Level 2 or 3 then a referral must be submitted to the MAPPA coordinator within five working days of submission of the notification form.
7 Multi-agency risk management can require a significant resource and should only be used where this level of collaboration and coordination is necessary and proportionate to the management of the risk of serious harm. Any decision to refer an offender into Level 2 or Level 3 must be on the basis that a coordinated multi-agency response by senior staff is necessary and proportionate to manage the risk of serious harm.
8 For those offenders subject to a community disposal, or under supervision or notification requirements in the community, a referral may be made either by the police or CJSW at one of the two following points:
- at the time of the first risk assessment and development of the management plan; or
- at any point during the period of the order, supervision or notification requirement where the level of risk appears to have significantly increased.
Referrals from custody
9 The decision to refer to the MAPPA process at Level 2 or 3 will be discussed and agreed at the pre-release ICM case conference as part of the risk assessment and risk management process. The police and other agencies can be invited to attend ICM meetings where appropriate. SPS must send the MAPPA coordinator a notification/referral as soon as possible and not less than ten weeks prior to release, unless there are extenuating circumstances, following the pre-release ICM case conference. See Chapter 12 for further detail on ICM and offenders within the prison system.
10 A referral form is contained within the MAPPA document set attached to this guidance.
Practical considerations for MAPPA referrals
11 The responsible authority will complete the referral form providing all relevant information and submit, within the timescales laid out in paragraphs 6 and 9, to the coordinator to allow them to make an informed decision.
12 On receipt of a referral the MAPPA coordinator will decide if the circumstances meets the criteria for inclusion in MAPPA Level 2 or Level 3 based on the information provided.
13 If the referral is accepted, the coordinator will confirm this to the responsible authority and arrangements will be made by the coordinator to progress the case to the initial Level 2 meeting/Level 3 (MAPPP). Timescales for this are provided at paragraphs 22 and 23.
14 If the coordinator does not accept the referral then as soon as possible this should be notified to the referring responsible authority outlining the reasons.
15 In the absence of the coordinator ( e.g. on annual leave), the responsible authorities will ensure that there are mechanisms in place for such decisions to be made.
16 Where there is disagreement as to the MAPPA level and this cannot be resolved the final decision will be made by the local MAPPP designated leads from the local authority, police and health, and their rationale will be accurately reflected in the minutes. In cases where, after resolution, it is decided that the matter should be managed at Level 1, then the rationale for the decision will be recorded on ViSOR by the coordinator.
17 It should be noted that those offenders who are subject to both the SONR and statutory supervision do not necessarily require management at MAPPA Level 2 or 3, although good Level 1 practice would require the police and CJSW to coordinate their respective activities via an agreed risk management plan.
STAGE 3: Pre-meeting information sharing
Pre-meeting information sharing makes certain that:
- all responsible authorities and relevant Duty to Cooperate (DTC) agencies are aware of the referral;
- all agencies have an opportunity to identify and share relevant information that they hold;
- it reduces the amount of time spent exchanging information at Level 2/Level 3 (MAPPP) at the meeting allowing the focus to be on the issues of risk assessment and risk management; and
- there is clarification of the threshold for Level 3 (MAPPP).
19 The information included in the referral will be passed to identified contacts within the responsible authorities and relevant DTC agencies directly by the MAPPA coordinator. This requires the receiving agencies to have a single point through which this information can be securely passed.
20 The receiving agency will search their agency records for all relevant information about the offender, or victim, or potential victims. The search should be undertaken and the response completed as a priority task, and in any case, both will be completed and forwarded within five working days to the MAPPA coordinator, in the following terms:
- If nothing found - no trace/negative reply.
- If material found but not relevant - positive trace/negative reply.
- If material found and relevant - positive trace/positive reply and share the relevant information with either the managing agency or the MAPPA coordinator (as directed) for the sole purpose of public protection and reducing the likelihood of reoffending.
- If material found and relevance not clear - positive trace/further consideration required.
21 Those operationally responsible for the management of the offender should liaise with the local authority Sex Offender Liaison Officer (SOLO) in relation to accommodation and environmental scanning arrangements as set out in the National Accommodation Strategy for Sex Offenders (NASSO).
STAGE 4: MAPPA meeting
Initial Level 2 and Level 3 meetings
22 For those offenders in the community an initial Level 2 meeting must be held within twenty working days of receipt of referral by the MAPPA coordinator or their administrator.
23 An initial Level 3 meeting must be held within five working days of receipt of referral.
24 For those offenders in custody or being managed within the Care Programme Approach (CPA) the initial Level 2 or Level 3 meeting must take place prior to their release/discharge into the community. Further information about the CPA is contained within chapter 14.
25 The product of pre-meeting information exchanges should be compiled and provided in advance of the meeting to all agencies attending an initial Level 2 or Level 3 meeting to allow for suitable preparation. The purpose of the meeting is to:
- bring additional information or assist agencies to assess the relevance of existing information;
- Review and establish agreement regarding the development and implementation of a Risk Management Plan including ensuring;
- The analysis of the risk of serious harm has identified the risks;
- That the identified risk management strategies and activities are implemented in line with professional role and competence;
- That decisions are taken to address any obstacles to the delivery of the RMP and uninterrupted service provision;
- consider whether the MAPPA level should increase or decrease;
- set a formal review date for the risk management plan.
Organising appropriate attendance at Level 2 or Level 3 meetings
26 The MAPPA coordinator will identify which agencies are central to the delivery of the risk management plan and arrange for their attendance.
27 As well as senior representatives from the responsible authorities, supervising social workers and police officers can be invited to attend where appropriate.
28 The MAPPA coordinator can maximise agency involvement by organised scheduling of meetings and, where necessary, by the use of video conferencing. All agencies should be represented by senior personnel who understand the strategies for minimising or reducing risk of serious harm, and who have the authority to implement appropriate strategies agreed at the meeting on behalf of their agency.
29 The Chair should make sure that the meeting is focused on systematic assessment based on identified risk factors. The Chair should summarise the risk factors and provide direction on the actions and resources required to appropriately manage the case.
30 A review meeting should be scheduled to assess progress against the risk management plan. The timing of this review will reflect the individual circumstances of the risk management plan and should be agreed at the initial meeting. There are however minimum standards in respect of review periods as follows;
- Level 2 cases will be reviewed no less than once every 12 weeks;
- Level 3 cases will be reviewed no less than once every 6 weeks.
31 All agencies have a responsibility to report to the MAPPA coordinator any information that indicates a change in risk whenever that occurs.
32 Further information on Level 2 and Level 3 (MAPPP) is provided in chapter 5.
STAGE 5: Exit from MAPPA
33 It is recognised that the notification period has no bearing on the risk presented and the need to manage that risk, however, the exit of an offender from MAPPA is determined by the length of the SONR, or alternatively under the provisions of The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Remedial) (Scotland) Order 2011. More information on the 2011 Order is available in Chapter 16.
34 The lead agency must notify the MAPPA coordinator when an offender is nearing the end of their SONR and about to exit the arrangements. This notice should be provided with sufficient time to allow for a review of the circumstances to confirm whether continued management through MAPPA is justified and necessary.
35 In a small number of cases the offender may be assessed as still posing a significant risk of serious sexual harm to the public at the point they would normally leave the MAPPA. In these cases consideration should be given for the application of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order under the terms of Section 104 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which carries an automatic SONR provision.
36 Where an offender exits the arrangements the coordinator must update the relevant ViSOR record accordingly.
37 Unless a restricted patient remains subject to MAPPA by virtue of a SONR he/she will cease to be subject to MAPPA in the following circumstances:
- Return to prison of a transferred prisoner (Section 136 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003)
- A prisoner reaching his Earliest Date of Liberation during detention in hospital
- A Hospital Direction patient being returned to prison (Section 59A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) (Act) 1995)
- A Hospital Direction patient reaching his EDL
- A Mental Health Tribunal revoking the Compulsion Order which has the effect of revoking the restriction order (Section 57A and section 59 or section 57(2)(a) and (B) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
- A Mental Health Tribunal revoking the Restriction Order but retaining the Compulsion Order
Email: Gus MacDonald