Participatory engagement and social research: methods toolkit

A toolkit of methods available to assist developers, consultants, and researchers carrying out socio-economic impact assessments (SEIA).

This document is part of a collection


9. References and Resources

Ahmed, W (2019) Using Twitter as a data source: an overview of social media research tools, available: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/06/18/using-twitter-as-a-data-source-an-overview-of-social-media-research-tools-2019/

Aitken, M, Haggett, C, Rudolph, D (2014) Wind Farms Community Engagement Good Practice Review: Executive Summary, available: https://www.climatexchange.org.uk/research/projects/what-is-good-community-engagement-on-wind-farm-developments/

World Meteorological Organisation (2016) Integrated Flood Management Tools, Series No.25 version 1.0, available: http://www.floodmanagement.info/publications/tools/Tool_25_Public_Perception_of_Flood_Risk_and_Social_Impact_Assessment.pdf

Beedasy, J, Samur Zúñiga, A F, Chandler, T, & Slack, T. (2020). Online community discourse during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: an analysis of Twitter interactions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101870

British Sociological Association (2017) Statement of Ethical Practice, available from: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24310/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice.pdf

Broecks, K P F, van Egmond, S, van Rijnsoever, F J, Verlinde-van den Berg, M, & Hekkert, M P (2016). Persuasiveness, importance and novelty of arguments about Carbon Capture and Storage. Environmental Science and Policy, 59, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.004

Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office (2003) The Middelgrunden Offshore Windfarm, available: https://base.socioeco.org/docs/a118_doc1.pdf

Ellis G, Barry J & Robinson C (2007) Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50:4, 517-551, DOI: 10.1080/09640560701402075

European Commission (2023) Tiree Onshore Scenario Mapping for the Proposed Argyll Array Offshore Windfarm, available: Tiree Onshore Scenario Mapping for the proposed Argyll Array Offshore Windfarm | The European Maritime Spatial Planning Platform (europa.eu)

Escobar, O (2015) Citizens’ juries on wind farm development in Scotland, available: https://www.climatexchange.org.uk/research/projects/citizens-juries-on-wind-farm-development-in-scotland/

Haggett, C, Coleman, R, and Hodges, J (2015) ‘Environment, Imagination and Aesthetics: a new environmental impact assessment for natural Scotland' in Griffith, D. (ed) Imagining Natural Scotland, published by Creative Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage

Kaiser, M, Brunsting, S, Mastop, J, Zimmer, R, Shackley, S, Mabon, L, and Howell, R (2015) CCS acceptability: social site characterization and advancing awareness at prospective storage sites in Poland and Scotland’ Oil and Gas Science and Technology 70 (4): 767-784: https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014024

Klein, S, MacDonald, S, Battista, N (2015) Engaging Communities in Offshore Wind Case Studies and Lessons Learned from New England Islands (2015) available: https://www.islandinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Offshore-Wind-Report_v70918.pdf

Lipietz, B, Wickson, T, Diaconescu, I, Lee, R (2018) Social Impact Assessment in London Planning MSc Urban Development Planning Practice Module Report, available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/development/sites/bartlett/files/social_impact_assessment_in_london_planning.pdf

Local Government Association (2012) Participatory appraisal in South Tyneside neighbourhoods, available: https://www.local.gov.uk/case-studies/participatory-appraisal-south-tyneside-neighbourhoods

IAP2, International Association of Public Participation (2014) Public Participation Spectrum, available: https://www.iap2.org/page/pillars

International Association for Impact Assessment (2015) Social Impact Assessment: guide for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects, available: SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf

Mabon, L, & Shackley, S (2015). Meeting the targets or re-imagining society? An empirical study into the ethical landscape of carbon dioxide capture and storage in Scotland. Environmental Values, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14345368709907

Mabon, L, Shackley, S, Blackford, J, Stahl, H and Miller, A (2015) ‘Local perceptions of the QICS experimental offshore CO2 release: results from social science research’ International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 38: 18-25: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.022

Mabon, L, Kita, J and Xue Z (2017) ‘Challenges for social impact assessment in coastal regions: a case study of the Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project‘ Marine Policy 83: 243-251

Merry M K (2014) Broadcast Versus Interaction: Environmental Groups’ Use of Twitter, Journal of Information Technology & Politics DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.933723

Roberts, J, and Escobar, O (2015) Involving communities in deliberation: A study of 3 citizens’ juries on onshore wind farms in Scotland; ClimateXchange https://www.climatexchange.org.uk/media/1438/citizens_juries_-_full_report.pdf

Rudolph, D, Haggett, C, and Aitken, M (2015) Community Benefits From Offshore Renewables: Good Practice Review, Research commissioned for ClimateXChange for the Scottish Government, available: http://www.climatexchange.org.uk/reducing-emissions/community-benefits-offshore-renewables-good-practice-review/

Scottish Government (2015) Mapping Flood Disadvantage, available: https://www.gov.scot/publications/mapping-flood-disadvantage-scotland-2015-main-report/

Scottish Government (2022) Scotland's Climate Assembly – process, impact and assembly member experience: research report, available: Scotland's Climate Assembly - process, impact and assembly member experience: research report - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

Terwel, B W, & ter Mors, E (2015). Host community compensation in a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) context: Comparing the preferences of Dutch citizens and local government authorities. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 15–23.

The Countryside Charity (2005) Mapping Tranquillity, available: https://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/mapping-tranquility/

US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2013) Guide to Survey Design and Implementation: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/05/f0/53827-12.pdf

Vanclay, F (2012) The potential application of social impact assessment in integrated coastal zone management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 68, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.016

Wilsdon, J & Willis, R, (2004) See-Through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream, available: www.demos.co.uk

Contact

Email: ScotMER@gov.scot

Back to top