Journey Times in the Scottish Criminal Justice System 2024-25

3.    Background

The information presented in this bulletin illustrate some of the key trends in journey times for accused persons in the Scottish criminal justice system. For the purposes of this bulletin, a journey through the criminal justice system begins when the police is aware of an offence and ends when COPFS close the case or with the accused’s verdict and sentencing in courts, if applicable. Therefore, depending on the nature and severity of the charges involved, an accused can leave the criminal justice system via COPFS or at court.

The original purpose of this bulletin was to report on journey times for victims of Sexual crimes. Therefore, Sexual crimes are prioritised throughout this bulletin. This is different from other published justice statistics in Scotland which consider Non-sexual crimes of violence before Sexual crimes. Sexual crime can involve historic offences resulting in a lengthy investigation time.  While not covered extensively in this bulletin, the journey times on other crimes are explored in detail  in the published dashboard (Journey times in the Scottish Criminal Justice System interactive dashboard).

When an incident is reported to the police, they begin by considering whether a crime has been committed. If a crime has been committed and a suspect is identified, then police will follow one of three routes: decide that no further action is necessary, issue a fixed penalty notice or recorded police warning (police direct measures) or submit a report to COPFS. In cases where a police direct measure is issued, the time from an individual being cautioned or charged with an offence to being issued with a direct measure is usually short, if not immediate. This may allow for increased use of police direct measure as a disposal for low level offending in the future. Due to the rapid disposal of these cases, they are therefore not included in the scope of this bulletin. If a report is submitted to COPFS, the procurator fiscal will decide how to proceed with the case. This can involve taking no action (e.g. where there is not enough evidence), issuing a Fiscal direct measure (e.g. alternative to prosecution, fiscal fine or warning letter) or submitting the case for prosecution in court.

This bulletin uses two datasets supplied by COPFS and SCTS covering the time period April 2017 to March 2025 to calculate overall journey times and different stages. Both datasets consist of management information derived from live operational databases and as such may be subject to minor changes over time. The data sets have been subject to each organisation’s internal quality assurance procedures before being used for this analysis. Using these data sets, the bulletin presents information on median times (along with the 90th percentile time and number of accused, provided in the Supplementary tables) for accused persons from the “police known date” to the date that the case is closed by COPFS or they are disposed in court (i.e. the accused is given a verdict).

An issue involving the extraction times of the data included in this bulletin has been resolved. This issue has caused a delay in the publication of this bulletin and will cause future bulletins to be delayed by 6 months. The issue meant that some cases where one charge was disposed before another more serious charge were missed. This impacted the overall numbers of cases but internal QA work showed that median journey times were not significantly changed. Therefore, previous bulletins in this series have not been revised. The 2025-26 bulletin will be published by the end of 2026.

As with many other areas, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption and presented significant challenges for the operation of the justice system. Under emergency legislation enacted following the onset of the pandemic, the statutory time in which different parts of a criminal case had to be concluded were extended. Compliance with public health measures during the pandemic influenced operations across the criminal justice system. The Lord Advocate issued revised guidelines on the use of police custody, and the courts had to close for extended periods or operate at reduced capacity. The necessity for non-essential court business to be suspended and the need for social distancing rules to be considered as courts re-opened will have lengthened case journey times. In addition, the effects of the pandemic on police and COPFS workforces may also have impacted the growth in system backlogs and case journey times. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have added significantly to the age profile of business in hand which in turn will affect journey lengths.

Changes to court backlogs, as well as structural changes within the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, may be reflected in journey times.

During 2024–25, Summary Case Management (SCM) remained in the early stages of rollout and was not fully implemented until January 2026. As such, any changes in median registration-to-verdict times in Sheriff Court summary cases should not be interpreted as reflecting the impact of SCM.

The effects of SCM, together with the reintroduction of statutory time-bar limits to their pre-COVID durations in September 2025, are expected to become evident in future bulletins.

This bulletin does not seek to explain the reasons for changes in journey times. Individual justice organisations are best placed to provide insight into the factors driving any such changes.