Pre-recorded evidence and juror decision-making: evidence review

References

Antrobus, E., McKimmie, B. & Newcobe, P. (2016) ‘Mode of Children’s Testimony and the Effect of Assumptions about Credibility’ 23(6) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 922 – 940
Ask, K. & Landström, S. (2010) ‘Why Emotions Matter: Expectancy Violation and Affective Response Mediate the Emotional Victim Effect’ 34(5) Law and Human Behavior 392-401

Bornstein, B. (2017) ‘Mock Juror Sampling Issues in Jury Simulation Research: A Meta-Analysis’ 41(1) Law and Human Behavior 13-28
Brackel, G. (1976) ‘Videotape in Trial Proceedings: A Technological Obsession?’ 61 American Bar Association Journal 956-959
Braunack-Mayer, A. (2002) ‘The Ethics of Participating in Research’ 177(9) Medical Journal of Australia 471-472
Bray, R. & Kerr, N. (1987) The Psychology of the Courtroom, New York: Academic Press
Burton, M., Evans, R. & Sanders, A. (2006) ‘An Evaluation of the Use of Special measures for Vulnerable and Intimated Witnesses’, London: Home Office (Findings 270)

Cashmore, J. & De Haas, N. (1992) ‘The Use of Closed-Circuit Television for Child Witnesses in the ACT’, Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission
Cashmore, J. & Trimboli, L. (2006) ‘Child Sexual Assault Trials: A Survey of Juror Perceptions’, Crime & Justice Bulletin No 102, Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
Castelli, P., Goodman, G. & Ghetti, S. (2005) ‘Effects of Interview Style and Witness Age on Perceptions of Children’s Credibility in Sexual Abuse Cases’ 35(2) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 297-317
Clifford, B., Davies, G., Westcott, H. & Garratt, K. (1992) ‘Video Technology and the Child Witness,’ Final Report to the Police Foundation, London: University of East London
Council of HM Circuit Judges (2006) ‘Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims: A Consultation Response of the Council of Her Majesty’s Circuit Judges’, London: Council of HM Circuit Judges
Crown Prosecution Service (2009) ‘Child Abuse – Guidance on Prosecuting Cases of Child Abuse’, London: CPS

Davies, G., Wilson, C., Mitchell, R. & Milsom, J. (1995) ‘Videotaping Children’s Evidence: An Evaluation’, London: Home Office
Davies, G., Hoyano, L., Keenan, C., Maitland, L. & Morgan, R. (1999) ‘An Assessment of the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Evidence in Child Abuse Prosecutions’, London: Home Office
Davies, G. (1999) ‘The Impact of Television on the Presentation and Reception of Children’s Testimony’ 22 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 241-256
Devine, D., Olafson, K., Jarvis, L., Bott, J., Clayton, L. & Wolfe, J. (2004) ‘Explaining Jury Verdicts: Is Leniency Bias for Real?’ 34(10) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2069-2098
DePaulo, B., Stone, J. & Lassiter, G. (1985) ‘Deceiving and detecting deceit’ in B, Schlenker (ed.) The Self and Social Life, New York: McGraw Hill, 323–370
Diamond. S. (1997) ‘Illuminations and Shadows from Jury Simulations’ 21(5) Law and Human Behavior 561-571

Eastwood, C. & Patton, W. (2002) ‘The Experiences of Child Complainants of Sexual Abuse in the Criminal Justice System’, Canberra: Criminology Research Council
Eaton, T., Ball, P. & O’Callaghan, M. (2001) ‘Child Witness and Defendant Credibility: Child Evidence Presentation Mode and Judicial Instructions’ 31 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1845-1858
Edwards, J. (2003) ‘Medical Examinations of Sexual Assault Victims: Forensic Use and Relevance’ 15 Judicial Officers Bulletin 65-72
Ekman, P. (1985) Telling lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage, New York: Norton
Ellison, L. & Munro, V. (2014) ‘A Special Delivery? Exploring the Impact of Screens, Live Links and Video-Recorded Evidence on Mock Juror Deliberation in Rape Trials’ 23(1) Social and Legal Studies 3-29
Ellison, L. & Munro, V. (2010a) ‘Getting to (Not) Guilty: Examining Jurors’ Deliberative Processes in, and Beyond, the Context of a Mock Rape Trial’ 30(1) Legal Studies 74-97
Ellison, L. & Munro, V. (2010b) ‘A Stranger in the Bushes or An Elephant in the Room? Critical Reflections on Received Rape Myth Wisdom in the Context of a Mock Jury Study’ 13(4) New Criminal Law Review 781-801
Ellison, L. & Munro, V. (2009) ‘Turning Mirrors Into Windows? Assessing the Impact of (Mock) Juror Education in Rape Trials’ 49(3) British Journal of Criminology 363-383
Ellsworth, C. (1989) ‘Are Twelve Heads Better than One?’ 52 Law and Contemporary Problems 247-255

Finch, E. & Munro, V. (2008) ‘Lifting the Veil: The Use of Focus Groups and Trial Simulations in Legal Research’ 35 Journal of Law and Society 30-51
Finch, E. & Munro, V. (2006) ‘Breaking Boundaries? Sexual Consent in the Jury Room’ 26(3) Legal Studies 303-320
Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A. & Bull, R. (1992) ‘The effect of a 5 month delay on children’s and adult’s eyewitness memory 83(3) British Journal of Psychology 323 – 336
Fullwood, C., Judd, A. & Finn, M. (2008) ‘The Effect of an Initial Meeting Context and Video-Mediation on Jury Perceptions of an Eyewitness’ Internet Journal of Criminology 1-11

Goodman, G., Golding, J., Helgeson, V., Haith, M. & Michelli, J. (1987) ‘When a Child Takes the Stand: Jurors’ Perceptions of Children’s Eyewitness Testimony’ 11(1) Law and Human Behavior 27-40
Goodman, G., Taub, E., Jones, D., England, P., Port, L., Rudy, L., Prado, L., Myers, J. & Melton, G. (1992) ‘Testifying in Criminal Court: Emotional Effects on Child Sexual Assault Victims’, 57(5) Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1-161
Goodman, G., Tobey, A., Batterman-Faunce, J, Orcutt, H., Thomas, S., Shapiro, C. & Sachsenmaier, T. (1998) ‘Face-to-Face Confrontation: Effects of Closed-Circuit Technology on Children’s Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors’ Decisions’ 22 Law and Human Behavior 165-203
Goodman, G., Myers, J., Qin, J., Quas, J., Castelli, P., Redlich, A. & Rogers, L. (2006) ‘Hearsay versus Children’s Testimony: Effects of Truthful and Deceptive Statements on Jurors’ Decisions’ 30(3) Law and Human Behavior 363-401
Grant, J. (1987) ‘Face-to-Television Screen-to Face: Testimony by Closed Circuit Television in Cases of Alleged Child Abuse and the Confrontation Right’ 76 Kentucky Law Journal 273-299
Gudjonsson, G. & Henry, L. (2003) ‘Child and Adult Witnesses with Learning Disabilities: The Importance of Suggestibility’ 8 Legal and Criminological Psychology 241-252

Hamlyn, B., Phelps, A., Turtle, J. & Sattar, G. (2004) ‘Are Special Measures Working? Evidence From Surveys of Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses’, London: Home Office Research Study 283
HMCPS/ HMIC (2007) ‘Without Consent: A Report of the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Allegations of Rape’, London: HMCPSI

Kaufmann, G., Drevland, G., Wessel, E., Overskeid, G., & Magnussen, S. (2003) ‘The Importance of Being Earnest: Displayed Emotions and Witness Credibility’ 17(1) Applied Cognitive Psychology 21-34
Kerr, N. & MacCoun, R. (1985) ‘The Effects of Jury Size and Polling Method on the Process and Product of Jury Deliberation’ 48(2) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 349-363
Kerr, N., Nerenz, D. & Herrick, D. (1979) ‘Role Playing and the Study of Jury Behaviour’ 7(3) Sociological Methods and Research 337-355
Konradi, A. (1997) ‘Too Little Too Late: Prosecutors’ Pre-Court Preparation of Rape Survivors’ 22 Law and Social Inquiry 1-54
Krahenbuhl, S. (2012) ‘Does the Jury Really Need to Hear it All? The Effect of Evidence Presentation Practice on Jury Assessments of Children’s Eyewitness Testimony’ 18(9) Psychology, Crime and Law 847-858
Kramer, G. & Kerr, N. (1989) ‘Laboratory Simulation and Bias in the Study of Jury Behaviour: A Methodological Note’ 13(1) Law and Human Behavior 89-99

Landström. S., Ask, K. & Sommar, C. (2015a) ‘The Emotional Male Victim: Effects of Presentation Mode on Judged Credibility’ 56(1) Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 99-104
Landström, S., Ask, K., Sommar, C. & Willen, R. (2015b) ‘Children’s Testimony and the Emotional Victim Effect’ 20(2) Legal and Criminological Psychology 365-383
Landström, S. & Granhag, P. (2010) ‘In-court Versus Out-of-Court Testimonies: Children’s Experiences and Adults’ Assessments’ 24 Applied Cognitive Psychology 941-955
Landström, S. & Granhag, P. (2008) ‘Children’s Truthful and Deceptive Testimonies: How Camera Perspective Affects Adult Observers’ Perception and Assessment’ 14(5) Psychology, Crime and Law 381-396
Landström, S., Granhag, P. & Hartwig, M. (2007) ‘Children’s Live and Videotaped Testimonies: How Presentation Mode Affects Observers’ Perception, Assessment and Memory’ 12 Legal and Criminological Psychology 333-348
Landström, S., Granhag, P. & Hartwig, M. (2005) ‘Witnesses Appearing Live Versus on Video: Effects on Observers’ Perception, Veracity Assessments and Memory’ 19 Applied Cognitive Psychology 913-933
Lassiter, G., Geers, A., Handley, I., Weiland, P. & Munhall, P. (2002) ‘Videotaped Interrogations and Confessions: A Simple Change in Camera Perspective Alters Verdicts in Simulated Trials’ 87(5) Journal of Applied Psychology 867-874
Leippe, M. & Romanczyk, A. (1989) ‘Reactions to Child (Versus Adult) Eyewitnesses: The Influence of Jurors’ Preconceptions and Witness Behavior’ 13(2) Law and Human Behavior 103-132
Leippe, M. & Romanczyk, A. (1987) ‘Children on the Witness Stand: A Communication / Persuasion Analysis of Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses’ in S. Ceci et al (eds.) Children’s Eyewitness Memory, New York: Springer, 155-177
Lempert, R. (1975) ‘Uncovering Nondiscernible Differences: Empirical Research and the Jury-Size Cases’ 75 Michigan Law Review 644-707
Lieberman, J. & Sales, B. (1997) ‘What Social Science Teaches Us About the Jury Instruction Process’ 3 Psychology, Public Policy and the Law 589-644

MacCoun, R. & Kerr, N. (1988) ‘Asymmetric Influence in Mock Jury Deliberation: Jurors’ Bias for Leniency’ 54 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21-33
MacFarlane, K. & Krebs, S. (1986) ‘Videotaping of Interviews and Court Testimony’ in K. MacFarlane & J. Waterman (eds.) Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Prevention and Treatment, New York: Guildford Press, 67-100
McAuliff, B. & Kovera, M. (2012) ‘Do jurors get what they expect? Traditional versus alternative forms of children's testimony’, 18(1) Psychology, Crime & Law 27– 47
McCauley, M. & Parker, J. (2001) ‘When Will a Child Be Believed? The Impact of the Victim’s Age and Juror’s Gender on Children’s Credibility and Verdict in a Sexual Abuse Case’ 25(4) Child Abuse and Neglect 523-539
McMillan, L. & Thomas, M. (2009) ‘Police Interviews of Rape Victims: Tensions and Contradictions’ in M. Horvath & J. Brown (eds.) Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 255-280
Miller G. & Fontes, N. (1979) Videotape on Trial: A View from the Jury Box, Beverley Hills: Sage
Miller, G., Fonest, N., Boster, F. & Sunnafrank, M. (1977) ‘Methodological Issues in Jury Research: What Can Simulations Tell Us?’, paper presented at the Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco
Mills, L. (1973) ‘Six Member and Twelve Member Juries: An Empirical Study of Trial Results’ 6 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 671-711
Ministry of Justice (2016) ‘Process Evaluation of Pre-Recorded Cross-Examination Pilot (Section 28)’, London: Ministry of Justice
Ministry of Justice (2011) ‘Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Guidance on Using Special Measures’, London: MoJ
Montoya, J. (1992) ‘On Truth and Shileding in Child Abuse Cases’ 43 Hastings Law Review 1259-1319
Mukhopadhaya, K. (2003) ‘Jury Size and the Free Rider Problem’ 19(1) Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 24-44
Murray, K. (1995) ‘Live Television Link: An Evaluation of Its Use by Child Witnesses in Scottish Criminal Trials’, Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit

Nikonova, O. & Ogloff, J. (2005) ‘Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of Child Witnesses: The Impact of Judicial Warning’ 37(1) Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 1-19

Office for Criminal Justice Reform (2007) ‘Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims: Justice for Rape – Responses to Consultation’, London: OCJR
O’Grady, C. (1996) ‘Child Witnesses and Jury Trials: An Evaluation of the Use of Closed Circuit Television and Removable Screens in Western Australia’, Perth: Western Australia Ministry of Justice.
O’Neill & Zajac (2013) ‘The Role of Repeated Interviewing in Children’s Responses to Cross-Examination-Style Questioning’ 104(1) British Journal of Psychology 14-38
Orcutt, H., Goodman, S., Tobey, A., Batterman-Faunce, J. & Thomas, S. (2001) ‘Detecting Deception in Children’s Testimony: Factfinders’ Abilities to Reach the Truth in Open Court and Closed-Circuit Trials’ 25 Law and Human Behavior 339-372

Payne, S. (2009a) ‘Redefining Justice: Addressing the Individual Needs of Victims and Witnesses’, London: Home Office
Payne, S. (2009b) ‘Rape: The Victim Experience Review’, London: Home Office
Plotnikoff, J. & Woolfson, R. (2009) ‘Measuring Up? Evaluating Implementation of Government Commitments to Young Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings’, London: NSPCC
Pozzulo, J. & Dempsey, J. (2009) ‘Witness Factors and their Influence on Jurors’ Perceptions and Verdicts’ 36(9) Criminal Justice and Behavior 923-934

Ratcliff, J., Lassiter, G., Schmidt, H. & Snyder, C. (2006) ‘Camera Perspective Bias in Videotaped Confessions: Experimental Evidence of its Perceptual Bias’ 12(4) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 197-206
Reifman, A., Guisick, S. & Ellsworth, P. (1992) ‘Real Jurors’ Understanding of the Law in Real Cases’ 16(5) Law and Human Behavior 539-554
Richards, P., Morris, S. & Richards, E. (2008) ‘Turning Up the Volume: The Vulnerable Witnesses (Scotland) Act 2004’
available at http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2008/07/25160344/0).
Roper, R. (1980) ‘Jury Size and Verdict Consistency: A Line Has to be Drawn Somewhere’ 1414 Law and Society Review 977-995
Rose, V. & Ogloff, J. (2001) ‘Evaluating the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: A Method and An Example’ 25(4) Law and Human Behavior 409-431
Ross, D., Jurden, F. Lindsay, R. & Kenney, J. (2003) ‘Replications and Limitations of a Two-Factor Model of Child Witness Credibility’ 33(2) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 418-431
Ross, D., Hopkins, S., Hanson, E., Lindsay, R, Hazen, K & Eslinger, T. (1994) ‘The Impact of Protective Shields and Videotape Testimony on Conviction Rates in a Simulated Trial of Child Sexual Abuse’ 18(5) Law and Human Behavior 553-566

Scottish Court Service (2015) ‘Evidence and Procedure Review Report’, Edinburgh: Scottish Court Service
Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (2016) ‘Evidence and Procedure Review – Next Steps’, Edinburgh: Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service
Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (2017) ‘Evidence and Procedure Review: Child and Vulnerable Witnesses Project: Pre-Recorded Further Evidence Work-Stream Project Report’, Edinburgh: Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service
Scottish Executive (2005) ‘Special Measures for Vulnerable Adult and Child Witnesses: A Guidance Pack’, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
Scottish Government (2017) ‘Pre-Recording Evidence of Child and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: A Consultation’, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
Sealy, A. & Cornish, W. (1973) ‘Jurors and Their Verdicts’ 36(5) Modern Law Review 496-508
Sears, D. (1986) ‘College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of Human Nature’ 51 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 515-530
Sharp, F. (1989) ‘Video Evidence – A Doubtful Benefit for Children’ Journal of Child Law 95-97
Simon, R. & Mahan, L. (1971) ‘Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury and the Classroom’ 5 Law and Society Review 319-330
Spencer, J. (2012) ‘Conclusions’ in J. Spencer & M. Lamb (eds) Children and Cross-Examination: Time to Change the Rules? London: Bloomsbury
Stern, V. (2010) ‘Stern Review of Rape Reporting in England and Wales’ London: Home Office
Swim, J., Borgida, E. & McCoy, K. (1993) ‘Videotaped Versus In-Court Witness Testimony: Does Protecting the Child Witness Jeopardize Due Process?’ 23(8) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 603-631

Tayor, N. & Joudo, J. (2005) ‘The Impact of Pre-Recorded Video and Closed Circuit Television Testimony by Adult Sexual Assault Complainants on Jury Decision-Making: An Experimental Study’, Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series (No. 68), Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
Tinsley, Y. & McDonald, E. (2011) ‘Use of Alternative Ways of Giving Evidence by Vulnerable Witnesses: Current Proposals, Issues and Challenges’ 42(4)

Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 705-742
Tobey, A., Goodman, G., Batterman-Faunce, J., Orcutt, H. & Sachsenmaier, T. (1995) ‘Balancing the Rights of Children and Defendants: Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Children’s Accuracy and Jurors’ Perceptions’ in M. Zaragoza et al (eds.) Applied Psychology: Individual, Social and Community Issues, Volume 1: Memory and Testimony in Child Witnesses, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 214-239
Visher, C. (1987) ‘Juror Decision-Making: The Importance of Evidence’ 11 Law and Human Behavior 1-17

Wade, A., Lawson, A. & Aldridge, J. (1998) ‘Stories in Court’ 10(2) Child and Family Law Quarterly 179-189
Waterman, A. & Blades, M. (2013), ‘The Effect of Delay and Individual Differences on Children’s Tendency to Guess’ 49(2) Developmental Psychology 215-226
Weiten, W. & Diamond, S. (1979) ‘A Critical Review of the Jury Simulation Paradigm – The Case of Defendant Characteristics’ 23 Law and Human Behavior 71-93
Welbourne, P. (2002) ‘Videotaped Evidence of Children: Application and Implications of the Memorandum of Good Practice’ 32 British Journal of Social Work 553-571
Wessel, E., Magnussen, S. & Melinder, A. (2013) ‘Expressed Emotions and Perceived Credibility of Child Mock Victims Disclosing Physical Abuse’ 27(5) Applied Cognitive Psychology 611-616
Westera, N., Powell, M. & Milne, B. (2017) ‘Lost in the detail: Prosecutors’ perceptions of the utility of video recorded police interviews as rape complainant evidence’, 50(2) Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 252–268
Westera, N., McKimmie, B. & Kebbell, M. (2015) ‘Does the narrative style of video evidence influence judgements about rape complainant testimony?’ 29(5) Applied Cognitive Psychology 637–646
Westera, N., Kebbell, M. & Milne, B. (2013a) ‘Losing Two Thirds of the Story: A Comparison of the Video-Recorded Police Interview and Live Evidence of Rape Complainants’ (2013) Criminal Law Review 290-308
Westera, N., Kebbell, M. & Milne, B. (2013b) ‘It is Better, but does it look better? Prosecutor Perceptions of Using Rape Complainant Investigative Interviews as Evidence’ 19(7) Psychology, Crime and Law 595-610
Westera, N., Kebbell, M. & Milne, R. (2011) ‘Interviewing Rape Complainants: Police Officers’ Perceptions of Interview Format and Quality of Evidence’ 25(6) Applied Cognitive Psychology 917-926
Wilson, J. & Davies, G. (1999) ‘An Evaluation of the Use of Videotaped Evidence for Juvenille Witnesses in Criminal Courts in England and Wales’ 7(1) European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research 81-96
Wilson, D. & Donnerstein, E. (1977) ‘Guilty or Not Guilty? A Look at the ‘Simulated’ Jury Paradigm’ 16 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 175-190

Young, W., Cameron, N. & Tinsely, Y. (1999) ‘Juries in Criminal Trials Part 2: A Summary of the Research Findings’, Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission Paper 37

Zeisel, H. & Diamond, S. (1978) ‘The Effect of Peremptory Challenge on Jury and Verdict’ 30 Stanford Law Review 491-531