Effectiveness of children's services planning guidance: consultation analysis

Analytical report for the consultation on children services planning guidance.


Discussion

The consultation attracted a strong response from a broad mix of different stakeholders as well as a small number of individuals. Most respondents provided a good level of detail in their open-ended responses, setting out reasons for their agreement or lack of agreement with each of the questions asked.

Overview of Findings

Yes No N/R
Q1. Does the statutory guidance provided to date assist in the effective development of a Children's Services Plan? 67% 19% 14%
Q3. Does the statutory guidance provide sufficient advice on how widely you should consult in advance of developing a Children's Service Plan 67% 16.5% 16.5%
Q4. Do you agree that the guidance supports, enhances and strengthens inter-agency collaboration 56% 19% 25%
Q5. Does the statutory guidance support practitioners and staff in delivering the contents of the Children's Services Plan 33% 44% 23%

While the majority of respondents gave positive responses with regards to the effectiveness of the guidance in developing plans, advising on consultation and strengthening inter-agency collaboration, fewer than half felt that the guidance, at present, supports staff and practitioners in delivery. This was mainly because respondents felt that it was outwith the scope of statutory strategic guidance to shape operational practice, rather than it being perceived a weakness of the document per se.

Cross-Cutting Themes

A number of cross-cutting themes emerged across the consultation including:

  • that the existing statutory guidance is helpful, but could be strengthened by supporting planning partners to effectively engage children, families and communities in the development and delivery of Children's Services Plans;
  • throughout, the importance of early intervention and prevention should continue to be stressed as a priority;
  • creation of shorter, more succinct guidance that is accessible to all would be welcomed. Similarly, the guidance could be clearer about the need for a Children's Services Plan to be accessible, meaningful and accountable to a broad range of people in the community, including children;
  • more guidance on how Plans should reflect the needs of some of the most vulnerable and hard to reach children and young people, including those with learning disabilities, physical disabilities, those living in criminal contexts, in abusive and/or transient households;
  • stressing the Rights of service users to be heard in the planning process;
  • best practice examples and use of case studies could be used to good effect to enhance the guidance throughout;
  • greater recognition may be needed of wider strategic planning frameworks which local authorities are required to adhere to and ways of streamlining planning activities (including consultation activities) could be explored (especially linking the Plans to Local Outcome Improvement Planning);
  • scope for improving communication between strategic decision makers and practitioners in how Plans should be implemented, and what issues should be prioritised locally;
  • opportunities to show connected purpose in reporting, to minimise duplication in data collection and reporting;
  • the guidance could be enhanced by agreeing a suite of national indicators that all partners could work towards across agencies;
  • changing the wording of the document may encourage more shared ownership of Plans beyond local authorities and NHS boards alone;
  • scope for better involving and utilising third sector partners in the planning process overall (drawing in their unique skills and experience) with the guidance reinforcing this message; and
  • better monitoring and evaluation of compliance with the guidance.

The main point, it seems, is that it could be made clearer in the guidance how Children's Services Plans fit alongside other ongoing reviews and planning commitments to ensure that a congruent approach to improving outcomes for children and young people is achieved.

Sector Analysis

Although the numbers of respondents in each 'type' of sector makes analysis of differences unreliable at the quantitative level, some observations were made regarding differences in views expressed by those representing different sectors and/or issues which might differentially effect those working in the public, private or third sector domains.

Sector

Emergent Concerns

Public Sector (Local Authorities)

  • more cohesion needed in the planning landscape
  • Plans should specifically link more explicitly with Local Outcome Improvement Plans (LOIPs) and the guidance should offer assistance on this
  • further clarity on data required to fulfill various planning requirements and where these overlap to avoid duplication of effort and lead to a more effective planning process

Public Sector (Health)

  • more clearly delineate the role of Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs) in the delivery of Plans
  • lack of national and board level health needs data (including data to allow health changes to be evidenced)
  • mental health issues to be brought more to the fore in the guidance

Private Sector

  • stressing the importance of including private sector partners to ensure planning on a truly multi-agency basis
  • encouraging partners to engage with the independent sector (including independent schools) could be advanced further in the guidance

Third Sector

  • local authorities and health boards should be encouraged to have third sector representatives as active and equal members of planning groups
  • better signposting to local Third Sector Interfaces and more consideration of how TSIs can be supported and funded to work with planning groups
  • more clearly defining the role of the third sector on planning groups and stressing the added value that their involvement can bring
  • making better use/learning from Third Sector skills and experience in community engagement
  • uncertainty with third sector budget commitments can make some partnership relationships unstable

Volunteers/Non-specialists

  • the guidance should encourage more involvement of those working in volunteering roles, e.g. Parent Councils and volunteer support workers, for more rounded and comprehensive Plans to be produced
  • more accessible and non-technical guidance is required for non-specialist audiences

Other

  • guidance on how Children's Services Plans link with Corporate Parenting Plans (encouraging Scotland's Corporate Parents to improve the everyday lived experience and outcomes for those with care experience through the Children's Service planning process)

Overall, respondents supported the principles set out in the guidance that planning should be truly multi-agency, and but felt there was scope for greater clarity of roles and guidance on how to include the full range or partners, and their respective skills and expertise.

How Findings Link to the Earlier Consultation

Many of the findings from the current consultation mirror findings from the earlier consultation[8], including:

  • a need for the guidance to connect with wider policy and legislation;
  • further detailed guidance being needed regarding consultation with children and young people as service users, especially the most vulnerable and hard to reach individuals; and
  • the need for more accessible guidance to maximise reach.

As with the earlier consultation, most respondents were broadly supportive of the guidance in supporting the development of plans, but felt that the scope should not extend into practice guidance. Although more guidance on implementation is perhaps needed, this was seen as something to be separately addressed.

Next Steps

The findings from the consultation analysis will be published and will be used alongside the learning from the Children's Services Strategic Engagement Scotland-wide programme of visits to Children's Services Strategic Partners local areas, which ran from 5 October 2018 to 10 June 2019.

Conclusions

Overall, the guidance was viewed positively and as being fit for purpose, subject to some minor changes. This involves streamlining the document and making is more accessible, ensuing that it better reflects the current planning and policy landscapes and further strengthening advice around involving partners from the third sector to maximise efficiency of plan production and effectiveness of delivery.

Respondents commented that that they were pleased to have been given an opportunity to respond to the consultation and inform the future refinement of the guidance. Stakeholders also seem keen to share best practice, exchange knowledge and skills and learn from the first round of reporting to ensure the effectiveness of Plans going forward.

All shared the aspirations of the guidance and Children's Services Plans to improve outcomes for children and young people in Scotland.

Contact

Email: kenzy.thomson@gov.scot

Back to top