Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment on Pelagic Fisheries Management Plans
This partial business and regulatory impact assessment (BRIA) describes the anticipated economic impact of the five proposed fisheries management plans (FMPs) for pelagic fish stocks on the fishing sector and associated businesses.
Section 1: Background, aims and options
Background to policy issue
The Fisheries Act 2020[4] (‘the 2020 Act’) provides the framework to manage UK fisheries as an independent coastal state outside of the EU Common Fisheries Policy. The 2020 Act requires the UK fisheries policy authorities (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) and the devolved administrations in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales) to prepare and publish fisheries management plans (FMPs) to help deliver the UK ambition for sustainable fisheries. The relevant UK fisheries policy authorities for these six pelagic FMPs are Defra, Scottish Government and the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in Northern Ireland (DAERA):
- Atlanto Scandian herring FMP
- North Sea herring FMP
- West Coast of Scotland (and Clyde) herring FMP
- North Sea greater silver smelt FMP
- West of Scotland greater silver smelt FMP
- North Sea horse mackerel FMP
For the following two FMPs the relevant UK fisheries policy authorities are Defra, Scottish Government, the Welsh Government and the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in Northern Ireland (DAERA):
- Northern Shelf mackerel FMP
- Northern Shelf blue whiting FMP
Sea fish and shellfish are a common good because they are rivalrous[5] and non-excludable[6]. Given these characteristics, overexploitation and overconsumption are risks unless governments intervene. In addition to these characteristics, there are also negative externalities[7] associated with fishing itself and positive externalities associated with having a healthy and diverse marine environment. FMPs are one of many tools available to the Scottish Government (and other Governments), and managing the sustainability of fish stocks can additionally involve setting fishing quotas, introducing technical measures, or encouraging research and development.
The Joint Fisheries Statement[8] (JFS), published in November 2022, and updated in December 2024, lists 43 proposed FMPs to be published, including eight pelagic FMPs in UK waters, of which five will be consulted on first The fisheries policy authorities have a statutory obligation to prepare and publish any FMP on that list in accordance with the timescales set out in the JFS.
FMPs set out the policies designed to restore one or more stocks of sea fish to, or
maintain them at, sustainable levels or to contribute to that restoration or maintenance. Where there is not sufficient scientific evidence for assessing Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), plans may also consider steps to obtain scientific evidence for this. Each plan specifies the stock(s), type of fishing and the geographic area covered. Each FMP also identifies the actions that could be used to deliver its policies. Such measures may include both existing or new regulations, statutory instruments, technical measures, or non-statutory routes such as research plans, voluntary agreements, or codes of conduct.
The precise mechanisms used will depend on the policies set out in the plan and, where appropriate, will be enforced by the relevant national fisheries authority. The proposed measures could be regulatory or deregulatory, and positive or negative to business. Where actions involved proposed introduction of new measures, separate assessment, consideration, consultation and engagement on those measures would take place in the usual way before any introduction.
This BRIA has been produced to support the consultation on the pelagic FMPs. The purpose of the consultation is to seek views from those with an interest in the plans. The consultation also seeks feedback on the evidence presented in the plans and provides an opportunity for respondents to provide additional evidence that may support development of the FMP policies.
Purpose/ aim of action and desired effect
The aim of the five pelagic FMP is that the fisheries they cover are managed sustainably, to help ensure that stocks are maintained above biomass levels capable of producing MSY and to highlight areas that could lead to refinements to management approaches in the future.
In developing the policies and actions for the five Scottish Government-led pelagic FMPs, the fisheries policy authorities have considered the current policy landscape. This includes applicable international agreements and declarations, conservation advice and wider policy development already underway, in addition to considering what additional evidence, measures or policies may be needed to support both the vision of these FMPs and delivery of the fisheries objectives.
To ensure effective ongoing management of the pelagic fisheries in the UK waters, the five FMPs identify six policies (see below) focussed on domestic and international management priorities. These policies and the individual actions that sit under each policy, are subject to the consideration of the consultation and will be prioritised appropriately to ensure realistic and measurable outputs. They were drafted to meet the requirements of policies set out in the JFS and sections 6(3)(a) or 6(3)(b) of the Fisheries Act 2020 (where appropriate).
There is significant overlap in policies for the five pelagic FMPs, apart from policies 1 and 2 in the West Coast of Scotland and Clyde herring FMP which are different to account for the complexities around these stocks; this is intentional to ensure that there is harmonisation in management approaches and delivery as far as practicable. Area specific considerations, which do not span all five FMPs, are denoted in the individual FMPs.
For North Sea herring, ASH, Northeast Atlantic mackerel and Northern Shelf blue whiting FMPs the six policies are:
- Policy 1: Harvest the relevant stock sustainably, contributing to maintaining or restoring the biomass above the level capable of producing MSY
- Policy 2: Use the best-available scientific evidence to support management decisions relating to the setting of sustainable fishing opportunities
- Policy 3: Monitor catches of the relevant stock and ensure that where possible all catches are counted against quotas
- Policy 4: Identify and support implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches appropriate for the relevant fisheries
- Policy 5: Support fishing businesses to deliver socio-economic and cultural benefits for communities
- Policy 6: Reduce the impact of fishing on climate change and support the fishing industry to adapt to the impacts of climate change
For the West Coast of Scotland and Clyde herring FMP, the six policies are:
- Policy 1: Continue to manage the WoS and Clyde herring stocks using existing tools to maintain stock levels
- Policy 2: Improve the evidence base underpinning the stock, in order to support sustainable harvesting of the WoS and Clyde herring stocks, with biomass maintained above the level capable of producing MSY
- Policy 3: Monitor catches of WoS and Clyde herring and ensure that where possible all catches are counted against quotas
- Policy 4: Identify and support implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches appropriate for the relevant fisheries
- Policy 5: Support fishing businesses to deliver socio-economic and cultural benefits for communities
- Policy 6: Reduce the impact of fishing on climate change and support the fishing industry to adapt to the impacts of climate change
Once formally published, the policies and actions within the plans will need to be implemented. This will be an iterative process, and the Scottish Government will be working closely with the other fisheries administrations, the fishing sector and wider stakeholders on implementation.
Publishing the FMPs is the start of a multi-year cycle, and we will ensure that the plans strike the balance between building momentum for short-term actions and setting direction for the longer term. This can be further iterated as the evidence base is improved. The plans must be reviewed at least every six years. Cross regulator, government and industry groups have been central to the development of the draft FMPs. Stakeholder involvement and ongoing collaboration underpins successful delivery of the FMPs and will continue beyond their publication.
Options (considered so far/ still open)
Option 1 (preferred option): Publication of pelagic FMPs
The pelagic FMPs are published, setting out the policies designed to maintain stocks at sustainable levels by bringing together information on existing measures and available evidence, mapping where there are gaps and opportunities to fill them, setting a clear pathway to developing and introducing improved, evidence-based management in collaboration with industry/ stakeholders.
Option 2: Business as Usual (Do Nothing) – No pelagic FMPs published
If there was an intention to pursue Option 2, of not publishing the FMPs, amendments to the JFS would be required.
Sectors/ Groups affected
The following sectors have been identified as groups who will be affected by the proposal:
- UK pelagic fishing industry
- Wider UK and international pelagic fishing industry operating in UK waters
- UK retailers
Businesses will be invited to respond to the public consultation. This section of the
BRIA will be updated following input from relevant organisations.
Contact
Email: fmps@gov.scot