Publication - Report

Acoustic deterrence using startle sounds: long term effectiveness and effects on odontocetes

Published: 25 Nov 2013
Part of:
Marine and fisheries

This report presents the findings of field experiments aimed as testing the long-term effectiveness of a new deterrence method (acoustic startle reflex)on pinnipeds.

46 page PDF

1.2 MB

46 page PDF

1.2 MB

Acoustic deterrence using startle sounds: long term effectiveness and effects on odontocetes

46 page PDF

1.2 MB


Fjalling, A., Magnus, W., Westerberg, H., 2006. Acoustic harassment devices reduce seal interaction in the Baltic salmon-trap, net fishery. ICES J Mar Sci 63, 1751-1758

Fleshler, M., 1965. Adequate acoustic stimulus for startle reaction in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 60, 200-207.

Götz, T., Hastie, G., 2009. Noise profiles of other activities. In OSPAR commission: Overview of the impact of underwater sound in the marine environment. pp. 117-130. OSPAR commission.

Götz, T., Janik, V.M., 2010. Aversiveness of sound in phocid seals: psycho-physiological factors, learning processes and motivation. J Exp Biol 213, 1536-1548.

Götz, T., Janik, V.M., 2011. Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning. BMC Neuroscience 12.

Graham, I.M., Harris, R.N., Denny, B., Fowden, D., Pullan, D., 2009. Testing the effectiveness of an acoustic deterrent device for excluding seals from Atlantic salmon rivers in Scotland. ICES J Mar Sci 66, 860-864.

Jacobs, S.R., Terhune, J.M., 2002. The effectiveness of acoustic harrassment devices in the Bay of Fundy, Canada: seal reactions and a noise expsoure model. Aquat Mamm 28, 147-158.

Janik, V.M., Götz, T. (2008) An investigation of target-specificity and effectiveness of seal deterring sounds. Final Report to the Scottish Government.

Jefferson, T.A., Curry, B.E., 1996. Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: Do they work? Ocean & Coastal Management 31, 41-70.

Johnson, C.S., 1967. Sound detection thresholds in marine mammals, In Marine bio-acoustics. ed. W.N. Tavolga. Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.

Johnston, D.W., 2002. The effect of acoustic harassment devices on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Biol Cons 108, 113-118.

Kastelein, R.A., Bunskoek, P., Hagedoorn, M., Au, W.W.L., de Haan, D., 2002. Audiogram of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) measured with narrow-band frequency-modulated signals. J Acoust Soc Am 112, 334-344.

Kastelein, R.A., Wensveen, P.J., Hoek, L., Verboom, W.C., Terhune, J.M., 2009. Underwater detection of tonal signals between 0.125 and 100 kHz by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). J Acoust Soc Am 125, 1222-1229.

Lepper, P.A., Turner, V.L.G., Goodson, A.D., Black, K.D., 2004. Source levels and spectra emitted by three commercial aquaculture anti-predation devices, In Seventh European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA. Delft, Netherlands.

Lonergan, M., Duck, C.D., Thompson, D., Mackey, B.L., Cunningham, L., Boyd, I.L., 2007. Using sparse survey data to investigate the declining abundance of British harbour seals. J Zool 271, 261-269.

Lucke, K., Lepper, P. A., Blanchet, M.-A., & Siebert, U. , 2007. Testing the auditory tolerance of harbour porpoise hearing for impulsive sounds. Effects of Noise on Marine Life Conference. Nyborg, Denmark.

Mate, B.R., Harvey, J.T., 1987. Acoustical Deterrents in Marine Mammal Conflicts with Fisheries, In Oregon Sea Grant report. ORESU-W-86-001. p. 116, Oregon.

Morris, D.S., 1996. Seal predation at salmon farms in Maine, an overview of the problem and potential solutions. Mar Tech Soc J 30, 39-43.

Morton, A., 2000. Occurrence, photo-identification and prey of pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) in the Broughton Archipelago, Canada 1984-1998. Mar Mamm Sci 16, 80-93.

Morton, A.B., Symonds, H.K., 2002. Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada. ICES J Mar Sci 59, 71-80.

Nachtigall, P.E., Supin, A.Y. 2008. A false killer whale adjusts its hearing when it echolocates. J Exp Biol 211, 1714-1718.

Nash, C.E., Iwamoto, R.N., Mahnken, C.V.W., 2000. Aquaculture risk management and marine mammal interactions in the Pacific Northwest. Aquaculture 183, 307-323.

NMFS, 1995. Environmental assessment on protecting winter-run wild steelhead from predation by California sea lions in Lake Washington ship canal, In NMFS Environmental Assessment Report. p. 122. NMFS Northwest Regional Office, Seattle.

Norberg, B., 1998. Testing the effects of acoustic deterrent devices on California sea lion predation at a commercial salmon farm, In NMFS-NWFSC-28. ed. N.N.R. Office. NMFS Northwest Regional Office, Seattle.

Olesiuk, P.F., Nicol, L.M., Sowden, M.J., Ford, J.B., 2002. Effects of the sound generated by an acoustic harrassment device on the relative abundance and distribibution of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Retreat Passage, British Columbia. Mar Mamm Sci 18, 843-862.

Pemberton, D., Shaughnessy, P.D., 1993. Interaction between Seals and Marine Fish-Farms in Tasmania, and Management of the Problem. Aquat Cons Mar Freshwat Ecosys 3, 149-158.

Pilz, P.K.D., Schnitzler, H.U., Menne, D. 1987. Acoustic startle threshold of the albino-rat (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 101, 67-72.

Ross, A., 1988. Controlling nature's predators on fish farms, In Report for the Marine Conservation Society. p. 96.

Stoddart, C.W., Noonan, J., Martin-Iverson, M.T. 2008. Stimulus quality affects expression of the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice. Behav Neurosci 122, 516-526.

Taylor, V.J., Johnston, D.W., Verboom, W.C., 1997. Acoustic harassment device ( AHD) use in the aquaculture industry and implications for marine mammals. Proc Inst Acoust 19, 167-274.

Würsig, B., Gailey, G.A., 2002. Marine Mammals and Aquaculture: Conflicts and Potential Resolutions, In Responsible Marine Aquaculture. eds R.R. Stickney, J.P. McVey. CAB International.