Publication - Research and analysis

Impacts of lice from fish farms on wild Scottish sea trout and salmon: summary of science

Summary of information relating to impacts of salmon lice from fish farms on wild Scottish sea trout and salmon.

Impacts of lice from fish farms on wild Scottish sea trout and salmon: summary of science

Summary of information relating to impacts of salmon lice from fish farms on wild Scottish sea trout and salmon

The salmon louse is a native parasite that infests both farmed and wild salmonids to the potential detriment of aquaculture and angling interests (Torrissen et al. 2013). Recent reviews have considered information concerning interactions between salmon farms and wild salmonids (e.g. Taranger et al. 2015; Thorstad et al. 2015, Vollset et al. 2016). Here, the evidence available to assess the likelihood and scale of impact of salmon lice from salmon farms on Scottish wild salmonids is summarised. The aim is not to repeat existing reviews but to focus on key issues relevant to locating fish farms in the Scottish coastal zone.

Are salmon farms a significant source of salmon lice?

Yes, salmon farms have been shown to be a more important contributor than wild fish to the total numbers of salmon lice in the environment (Butler 2002; Penston & Davies 2009).

Is there an association between levels of lice on salmon farms and in the surrounding environment?

Yes, environmental larval lice concentrations relate to local farm lice loads (McKibben & Hay 2004; Penston & Davies 2009; Harte et al. 2017).  The distribution of lice depends on hydrodynamic conditions and so the relationship may be highly variable at any specific location (Salama et al. 2013).

Is there an association between levels of lice on salmon farms and on wild sea trout?

Yes, analysis of data from Norway highlights a significant relationship between infection potential from farms and settlement on wild sea trout (Hellend et al. 2015).   Data collected throughout the west coast of Scotland showed that the proportion of individual sea trout with sea louse burdens above a level known to cause physiological stress increased with the mean weight of salmon on the nearest fish farm (a measure of where they are in their production cycle), and decreased with distance from that farm (Middlemas et al. 2013). A similar pattern was noted in a study of farms in a loch on the Isle of Skye (Moore et al. 2018), and analysis of Irish and Scottish sea trout data (Shepherd et al. 2016).

Is there an effect of salmon lice on wild sea trout at the individual level?

Individual wild sea trout sampled on the west coast of Scotland have been shown to have salmon louse infestations above a level known to cause physiological harm (Middlemas et al. 2010, 2013).  Studies in Norway have also indicated changes in behaviour of sea trout, with them spending more time in freshwater environments when sea lice infestation levels were high (Halttunen et al. 2018).

Is there evidence of an effect of salmon lice on wild sea trout at the population level?

No such direct evidence for a Scottish situation has been published.

An experiment in Norway, comparing survival of anti-lice treated sea trout smolts with non-treated smolts, indicated an increased survival rate of 3.41% over 1.76% , this is about a 50% reduction in the stock returning to the river, suggesting that salmon lice can negatively affect sea trout populations (Skaala et al. 2014).

Is there an association between levels of lice on salmon farms and on wild salmon?

No information is available for wild salmon in Scotland. An association between lice levels on  farms with louse settlement on hatchery reared salmon held short distances away has been noted. However it is inconclusive as to whether it is possible to estimate infection pressure from salmon farms at specific points in time (Pert et al. 2014).  In Scotland and Norway, salmon lice abundance on farmed fish is lowest in early spring and peaks during autumn (Jansen et al. 2012; Murray 2016a). This seasonal change in lice infestation levels is comparable to those observed on wild salmonids in Norway (Serra-Llinares et al. 2014).

Is there an effect of salmon lice on wild salmon at the individual level?

No information is available for Scotland.

In Norway, an experiment examining returning wild and hatchery reared salmon that had been treated with an anti-lice medicine indicated that non treated salmon returning after one winter at sea tended to be smaller than the treated fish (Skilbrei et al. 2013).

Is there an effect of salmon lice on wild salmon at the population level?

No empirical information exists on impacts of lice on wild populations of salmon in Scotland. Declines in catches of wild salmon have been steeper on the Scottish west coast than elsewhere in Scotland and Norway (Vøllestad et al. 2009) although the authors stressed that this did not prove a causative link with aquaculture. Ford & Myers (2008) compared indices of salmon abundance on the east and west coasts of Scotland together with farm production data. They found a reduction in the catches and counts of salmon on the west coast correlating with increased production of farmed salmon. In addition Butler & Watt (2003) showed that rivers with farms had significantly lower abundances of juvenile salmon than those without farms.

Shephard & Gargan (2017) estimated that returns of salmon after one year at sea were 50% lower in the river Errif, Ireland, in years following high sea lice levels on nearby salmon farms during smolt migration than in other years.  A declining trend in marine survival of salmon remained when the predicted impact of sea lice was removed, suggesting multiple factors affecting survival. The authors considered that the reduction in returning salmon numbers due to sea lice could affect the viability of the salmon population in the long term.

Experiments comparing survival of smolts treated or untreated with anti-sea lice medicines have shown that sea lice adversely affect certain salmon populations in Norway and Ireland (e.g. Vollset et al. 2014; 2016). There is a great deal of year-to-year and site-to-site variability in the magnitude of such impacts and the reduction in numbers of returning salmon associated with lice infestations is in the range of 0-39% (Jackson et al. 2011; Krkošek et al. 2013; Skilbrei et al. 2013; Vollset et al. 2016). A meta-analysis of all available Norwegian studies showed anti-lice treatment increased returns of adult salmon by an average of 18% (Vollset et al. 2016).  It is not clear in these studies how much of the estimated impact of lice is due to baseline natural levels in the environment and how much is associated with an additional effect caused by salmon aquaculture.   The estimated mean effect size of lice seen in other countries is of a similar magnitude to the difference between the aquaculture zone and east coast of Scotland in the reduction in abundance of wild salmon determined using data from fish counters (Ford & Myers 2008). It is not clear how much of this regional variation may be due to factors besides aquaculture.

Over what distance do farms influence environmental lice levels?

Salmon lice transport modelling in a Scottish system reports that >97.5% of sea lice are transported within 15 km of fish farms (Salama et al. 2016).  However, site-specific factors, such as prevailing wind and currents, and local topography can have a large impact on the direction and distance of lice dispersal (Salama et al. 2013, 2018; Adams et al. 2012).

Middlemas et al. (2013) found a significant relationship between sea lice infestations on sea trout and the distance to the nearest salmon farm. Infestation levels were highest when sea trout were sampled near to a salmon farm and reduced as the distance to the nearest farm increased. There is considerable scatter around the general relationship found by Middlemas et al. (2013) which likely reflects unknown site-specific factors and unaccounted fish movements.

Do we understand the dispersal patterns of sea trout and salmon?

Salmon smolts depart rapidly from home rivers but there is no knowledge of their subsequent distribution in relation to the Scottish coast. In general sea trout remain near shore for their first two months at sea and then disperse more widely. There is no understanding of the scale of sea trout dispersal or whether it is uniform in direction relative to the home river (Middlemas et al. 2009, Malcolm et al. 2010).

Can fish farmers reduce numbers of lice released into the environment?

There are a number of control strategies that farms can use to reduce salmon lice infestation. These include chemical, physical and biological methods. Historically chemical treatments have been favoured, reduced efficacy of treatments has been documented (Lees et al. 2008; Aaen et al. 2015) as has increased frequency of treatment (Murray 2016b). This has encouraged alternative control methods to be investigated. One of these is the use of cleaner fish, such as wrasse, as a biological control. These fish are introduced into pens to directly eat lice off salmon (Leclercq et al. 2013). This adds an additional method to control sea lice as part of integrated pest management; other methods include functional feeds (Jensen et al. 2015), cage design to control salmon swimming depth or source of cage intake water (Stein et al. 2016; Nilsen et al. 2017), thermal removal of sea lice (Grøntvedt et al. 2015), freshwater treatment (Powell et al. 2015) and selective breeding (Gharbi et al. 2015).  

Summary

Salmon aquaculture can result in elevated numbers of sea lice in open water and hence is likely to increase the infestation potential on wild salmonids.  This in turn could have an adverse effect on populations of wild salmonids in some circumstances. The magnitude of any such impact in relation to overall mortality levels is not known for Scotland. Concerns that there may be a significant impact of aquaculture were raised initially due to declines in catches of both salmon and sea trout on the Scottish west coast. There is scientific evidence that individual Scottish sea trout can experience physiologically detrimental burdens of salmon lice in areas with salmon aquaculture but the effects on populations in different areas is not known. International scientific evidence from Norway and Ireland indicates that early protection against salmon lice parasitism results in reduced absolute marine mortality, and reduces the time spent at sea,  indicating that salmon lice can influence the population status of wild salmon.  Marine Scotland Science  is completing a pilot project to investigate feasibility of addressing this data gap for Scottish salmon. Further information on this project can be found on the SARF website. The interim findings, combined with other data from rod catches and counters, suggest that survival of wild salmon at sea on the west coast of Scotland is too low for the approach at present to be expanded into a network of experimental sites.

Details of all references cited:

Aaen S.M., Helgesen K.O., Bakke M.J., Kaur K., Horsberg T.E. (2015) Drug resistance is sea lice: a threat to salmonid aquaculture. Trends in Parasitology 31, 72-81.

Adams T., Black K., Macintyre C., Macintyre I. & Dean R. (2012) Connectivity modelling and network analysis of sea lice infection in Loch Fyne, west coast of Scotland. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 3, 51–63.

Butler J.R. (2002) Wild salmonids and sea louse infestations on the west coast of Scotland: sources of infection and implications for the management of marine salmon farms.  Pest Management Science 58, 595-608.

Butler J.R.A. & Watt, J. (2003) Assessing and managing the impacts of marine salmon farms on wild Atlantic salmon in western Scotland: identifying priority rivers for conservation. Pp 93-118 in Mills D (ed.) Salmon at the edge. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

Ford, J.S. & Myers, R.A. (2008) A global assessment of salmon aquaculture impacts on wild salmonids. PLoS Biology, 6(2), e33

Gharbi K., Mathews, L., Bron, J., Roberts, R., Tinch, A. & Stear, M. (2015) The control of sea lice in Atlantic salmon by selective breeding. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 12, 20150574

Grøntvedt R.N., Nerbøvik I.K.G., Viljugrein H., Lillehaug A., Nilsen H., Gjevre A.G. (2015)   Thermal de-licing of salmonid  fish – documentation of fish welfare and effect. Norwegian Veterinary Institutes Report series 13.

Halttunen E., Gjelland K-Ø., Hamel S., Serra-Llinares R-M., Nilsen R., Arechavala-Lopez P., Skarðhamar J., Johnsen I.A., Asplin L., Karlsen Ø., Bjørn P-A., Finstad B. (2018)  Sea trout adapt their migratory behaviour in response to high salmon lice concentrations.  Journal of Fish Diseases 41, 953–967

Harte A.J., Bowman A.S., Salama N.K., Pert C.C. (2017) Factors influencing the long-term dynamics of larval sea lice density at east and west coast locations in Scotland.  Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 123, 181-192.

Helland I.P., Uglem I., Jansen P.A., Diserud O.H., Bjørn P.A. & Finstad B. (2015) Statistical and ecological challenges of monitoring parasitic salmon lice infestations in wild salmonid fish stocks. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 7, 267-280.

Jackson D., Cotter, D., ÓMaoiléidigh, N., O’Donohoe, P., White, J., Kane, F., Kelly, S., McDermott, T., McEvoy, S., Drumm, A., Cullen, A., & Rogan, G. (2011) An evaluation of the impact of early infestation with the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis on the subsequent survival of outwardly migrating Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts. Aquaculture, 320, 159-163.

Jansen, P.A., Kristoffersen, A.B., Viljugrein, H., Jimenez,D., Aldrin, M. & Stien, A. (2012) Sea lice as a density-dependent constraint to salmonid farming. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 279, 2330–2338.

Jensen L.B., Provan, F., Larssen, E., Bron, J.E. & Obach A. Reducing sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis infestation of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) through functional feeds. Aquaculture Nutrition 21, 983-993

Krkošek, M., Revie, C.W., Gargan, P.G., Skilbrei, O.T., Finstad, B. & Todd, C.D. (2013) Impact of parasites on salmon recruitment in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 280, 20122359.

Leclercq E., Davie A. & Migaud H.(2013) Delousing efficiency of farmed ballan wrasse (Labrus bergylta) against Lepeophtheirus salmonis infecting Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) post-smolts. Pest Management Science 70, 1274-1282.

Lees F., Baillie M., Gettinby, G. & Revie C.W. (2008) The efficacy of emamectin benzoate against infestations of Lepeophtheirus salmonis on farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in Scotland, 2002-2006. PLoS ONE, 3, e1549.

 

Malcolm, I.A., Godfrey, J.D. & Youngson, A.F. 2010. Review of migratory routes and behaviour of Atlantic salmon, sea trout and European eel in Scotland's coastal environment: implications for the development of marine renewables. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science. 1, 14: 1-72. Available at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/295194/0111162.pdf.

McKibben M.A., Hay D.W. (2004)  Distributions of planktonic sea lice larvae Lepeophtheirus salmonis in the inter‐tidal zone in Loch Torridon, Western Scotland in relation to salmon farm production cycles.  Aquaculture Research 35(8), 742-750.

 

Middlemas S.J., Stewart, D.C., Mackay, S. & Armstrong J.D. (2009) Habitat use and dispersal of post-smolt sea trout Salmo trutta in a Scottish sea loch system. Journal of Fish Biology74, 639-651.

Middlemas S.J., RaffelL J.A., Hay, D.W., Hatton-Ellis, M. & Armstrong, J.D. (2010) Temporal and spatial patterns of sea lice levels on sea trout in western Scotland in relation to fish farm production cycles. Biology Letters 6, 548–551.

Middlemas S.J., Fryer R.J., Tulett D. & Armstrong J.D. (2013) Relationship between sea lice levels on sea trout and fish farm activity in western Scotland. Fisheries Management and Ecology 20, 68–74.

Moore I., Dodd J.A., Newton M., Bean C.W., Lindsay I. (2018)  The influence of aquaculture unit proximity on the pattern of Lepeophtheirus salmonis infection of anadromous Salmo trutta populations on the isle of Skye, Scotland.  Journal of Fish Biology 92, 1849-1865.  

Murray A.G. (2016a) A note on sea lice abundance on farmed salmon in Scotland 2011-13: significant regional and seasonal variation. Aquaculture Research47, 961-968.

Murray A.G. (2016b) Increased frequency and changed methods in the treatment of sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) in Scottish salmon farms 2005-2011.  Pest Management Science 72, 322-326

Nilsen A., Vale Nielsen K., Biering E. & Bergheim A. (2017)  Effective protection against sea lice during the production of Atlantic salmon in floating enclosures. Aquaculture 466, 41-50.

Penston, M.J. & Davies, I.M. (2009) An assessment of salmon farms and wild salmonids as sources of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) copepodids in the water column in Loch Torridon, Scotland. Journal of Fish Diseases 32, 75-88.

Pert, C.C., Fryer, R.J., Cook, P., Kilburn, R., McBeath, S., McBeath, A., Matejusova, I., Urquhart, K., Weir, S.J., McCarthy, U., Collins, C., Amundrud, T. & Bricknell, I.R. (2014). Using sentinel cages to estimate infestation pressure on salmonids from sea lice in Loch Shieldaig, Scotland. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 5, 49-59.

Powell, M.D., Reynolds, P. & Kristensen, T. (2015) Freshwater treatment of amoebic gill disease and sea-lice in seawater salmon production: Considerations of water chemistry and fish welfare in Norway. Aquaculture, 448, 18-28.

Salama N.K.G., Collins C.M., Fraser J.G. Dunn J., Pert C.C. Murray A.G. & Rabe B. (2013) Development and assessment of a biophysical dispersal model for sea lice. Journal of Fish Diseases 36, 323-337.

Salama, N.K.G., Dale, A.C., Ivanov, V.V., Cook, P.F., Pert, C.C., Collins, C.M. & Rabe, B. (2018) Using biological-physical modelling for informing sea lice dispersal in Loch Linnhe, Scotland. Journal of Fish Diseases, 41, 901-919.

Salama N.K.G., Murray, A.G. & Rabe B. (2016) Simulated environmental transport distances of Lepeophtheirus salmonis in Loch Linnhe, Scotland for informing aquaculture area management structures. Journal of Fish Diseases DOI: 10.1111/jfd.12375

Skaala, O., Kalas, S. &Borgstrom R. (2014) Evidence of salmon lice-induced mortality of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the Hardangerfjord, Norway. Marine Biology Research10, 279-288.

Serra-Llinares R.M., Bjørn P.A., Finstad B., Nilsen R., Harbitz A., Berg M. & Asplin L. (2014) Salmon lice infection on wild salmonids in marine protected areas: an evaluation of the Norwegian ‘National Salmon Fjords’. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 5, 1−16.

Shepherd S., MacIntyre C., Gargan P. (2016) Aquaculture and environmental drivers of salmon lice infestation and body condition in sea trout. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 8, 597-610.

Shephard S.,  Gargan P. (2017) Quantifying the contribution of sea lice from aquaculture to declining annual returns in a wild Atlantic salmon population.  Aquaculture Environment Interactions 9, 181-192.

Skilbrei O.T., Finstad B., Urdal K., Bakke G., Kroglund F. & Strand R. (2013) Impact of early salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, infestation & differences in survival & marine growth of sea-ranched Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts 1997-2009. Journal of Fish Diseases 36, 249–260.

Stein, L.H., Dempster, T., Bui, S., Glauropoulis A., Fosseidengen J.E., Wright, D.W. & Oppedal, F. 2016 ‘Snorkel’ sea lice barrier technology reduces sea lice load on harvest-size Atlantic salmon with minimal welfare impacts. Aquaculture 458, 29-37

Taranger G.L., Karlsen Ø., Bannister R.J., Glover K.A., Husa V., Karlsbakk E., Kvamme B.O., Boxaspen K.K., Bjørn P.A., Finstad B.&  Madhun A.S. (2015). Risk assessment of the environmental impact of Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72,997-1021.

Thorstad E.B., Todd C.D., Uglem I., Bjørn P.A., Gargan P.G., Vollset K.W., Halttunen E., Kålås S., Berg M. & Finstad B. (2015) Effects of salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis on wild sea trout Salmo trutta—a literature review. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 7, 91-113.

Torrissen O., Jones S., Asche F., Guttormsen A., Skilbrei O.T., Nilsen F., Horsberg T.E. & Jackson D.  (2013) Salmon lice–impact on wild salmonids and salmon aquaculture. Journal of Fish Diseases36, 171-194.

Vøllestad, L.A.,Hirst D., L’Abée-Lund J.H., Armstrong J.D., MacLean J.C., Youngson A.F. & Stenseth N.C. (2009) Divergent trends in anadromous salmonid populations in Norwegian and Scottish rivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B series, 276, 1021-1027

Vollset, K.W., Barlaup, B. T., Skoglund, H., Normann, E.S., Skilbrei, O.T. (2014) Salmon lice increase the age of returning Atlantic salmon. Biology Letters, 10:20130896.

Vollset, K. W., Krontveit, R. I., Jansen, P. A., Finstad, B., Barlaup, B. T., Skilbrei, O. T., Krkošek, M., Romunstad, P., Aunsmo, A., Jensen, A. J. and Dohoo, I. (2016), Impacts of parasites on marine survival of Atlantic salmon: a meta-analysis. Fish and Fisheries. 17, 714-730.