Digital Government (Scottish Bodies) Regulations 2022: Fairer Scotland Duty Summary
Fairer Scotland Duty Summary for the Digital Government (Scottish Bodies) Regulations 2022
The Digital Government (Scottish Bodies) Regulations 2022 : Fairer Scotland Duty Summary
Fairer Scotland Duty Summary
Title of policy, strategy or programme
The Digital Government (Scottish Bodies) Regulations 2022
Summary of aims and expected outcomes of strategy, proposal, programme or policy
The Digital Government (Scottish Bodies) Regulations 2022 add certain Scottish public authorities with devolved functions ("Scottish Bodies") to schedule 7 (debt) and 8 (fraud) of the Digital Economy Act 2017 ("the Act") so providing a new legal gateway for Scottish Bodies to use to enter into information sharing agreements with other listed bodies. The UK and Welsh Governments have already added UK, English and Welsh bodies to the schedules.
Part 5 of the Act introduces new information sharing powers to reduce debt owed to, or fraud against, the public sector. To be able to use the information sharing powers, public authorities (and bodies which provide services to public authorities in Scotland) must be listed in schedule 7 of the Act for the debt powers or schedule 8 for the fraud powers. A listed public authority can only share data under these powers with other persons who are also listed in the relevant schedule. The Act regulates what data can be shared and for what purposes. The Act does not compel public authorities to share data. The information sharing powers in the Act are permissive. It is for the public authorities listed to decide to make use of the powers and to seek to enter into information sharing agreements with other listed bodies.
The Scottish Bodies listed in the Regulations are in the Annex.
Summary of evidence
Public authorities listed in schedules 7 and 8 of the Act must have regard to the Code of Practice for public authorities disclosing information under Chapters 1, 3 and 4 (Public Service Delivery, Debt and Fraud) of Part 5 of the Digital Economy Act 2017) (the Code). The Code provides details on how the debt and fraud information sharing powers should operate. It provides that in the first instance, all information sharing under the debt and fraud powers is run as a pilot. The impact of Scottish Bodies using the debt and fraud powers will not be apparent until proposals to pilot the use of the powers are in development. Therefore, this is an introductory Fairer Scotland Duty Assessment which will be reviewed once initial evidence from pilots on their impacts becomes available. However, public authorities will have to act in accordance with equalities legislation in developing their data sharing arrangements and many are subject to the Fairer Scotland Duty.
The Code sets out the guidance on the process which bodies will need to follow to establish a new pilot. The purpose of such pilots is to allow for the benefit of the data share to be explored and to identify any potential impacts and ethical issues. Pilots will determine whether and how there is value in sharing personal information for the purposes of taking action in connection with debt owed to, or fraud against the public sector.
Public bodies wishing to establish a pilot submit a business case, information sharing agreement, data protection impact assessment and security plan to the secretariat of a review board. The UK Government has established a review board to oversee reserved and England-only data sharing under the fraud and debt powers. The board assesses and makes recommendations to UK Ministers on each pilot proposal. The Scottish Government will similarly establish its own structures for the oversight of data sharing arrangements for Scotland.
The Code also includes Fairness Principles which provide a set of best practice guidelines to help ensure a common approach to fairness is considered when sharing information under the debt power. The UK Government worked in partnership with non-fee paying debt advice providers to develop these Principles. Where a vulnerable customer is identified, the Fairness Principles provide that they should be given appropriate support and advice. This is particularly relevant in the wake of Covid-19 where individuals may be experiencing hardship.
The Code sets out that information about information sharing agreements should be published in a searchable electronic public register. The UK Government has established a register for reserved and England-only information sharing agreements. A similar register will be established for devolved information sharing agreements.
Failure to have regard to the Code may result in a public authority or organisation losing the ability to disclose, receive and use data under the powers in the Act.
Other safeguards are in place as bodies will have to comply with equality, data protection and Human Rights legislation and some the Fairer Scotland Duty.
There have been two public consultations seeking views on Scottish Bodies to be included in the schedules. Amongst those invited to respond to the consultations were Scottish public bodies, poverty groups and the Information Commissioner.
There was broad support for the proposals. No concerns were raised by stakeholders or individuals regarding negative impacts on inequality for those experiencing poverty.
The only concern raised about the impact of the Regulations was in relation to the requirement to comply with section 22 of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 which provides that it is an offence for a person who has acquired protected information in an official capacity to disclose the information to another person. Protected information is information relating to an application for a gender recognition certificate. These arrangements are not affected by the Regulations
The consultations, answers from respondents who gave permission for them to be published and analysis of responses, can be found here:
Scottish public authorities sharing data: consultation
Scottish public authorities sharing data: further consultation
Summary of assessment findings
Taking in to consideration the information above, no potential improvements have been identified.
Albert King, Chief Data Officer
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback