New National Parks - appraisal framework: consultation analysis
Consultation analysis report on the draft appraisal framework criteria for new National Parks.
Appendix A: Quantitative Analysis
This appendix provides more detailed breakdowns of the 29 quantitative closed questions included in the consultation.
The tables for each question show:
- The number of respondents from the total sample of 165 respondents who selected each response, and the corresponding percentage.
- The number and percentage response among those who answered each question, broken down by:
- Individual and organisation responses.
- By type of organisation.
Please note that the row percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.
Criterion 1: Outstanding national importance
Q1. Do you agree that ‘outstanding national importance’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 138 | 14 | 5 | 8 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 84 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 157 | 88 | 9 | 3 | - |
| Individuals | 129 | 86 | 10 | 4 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 96 | 4 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q2. Do you agree with the components of criterion 1 (outstanding national importance)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: Is the proposed area of outstanding national importance due its natural heritage, including biodiversity, geodiversity and landscapes?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 139 | 13 | 4 | 9 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 84 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 156 | 89 | 8 | 3 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 88 | 9 | 3 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: Is the proposed area of outstanding national importance due to the area’s cultural heritage, including the historic environment?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 114 | 21 | 14 | 16 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 69 | 13 | 8 | 10 |
| All answering (%) | 149 | 77 | 14 | 9 | - |
| Individuals | 121 | 73 | 16 | 12 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Criterion 2: Size, character and coherence
Q3. Do you agree that ‘size, character and coherence’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 132 | 19 | 4 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 80 | 12 | 2 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 85 | 12 | 3 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 83 | 14 | 3 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 96 | 4 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 33 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q4. Do you agree with the components of criterion 2 (size, character and coherence)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: Does the proposed area have a distinctive character and coherent identity?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 136 | 14 | 5 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 82 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 88 | 9 | 3 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 86 | 10 | 4 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 96 | 4 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: Is the proposed area of a sufficient size to warrant integrated management as a National Park?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 117 | 23 | 12 | 13 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 71 | 14 | 7 | 8 |
| All answering (%) | 152 | 77 | 15 | 8 | - |
| Individuals | 124 | 77 | 15 | 8 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 79 | 14 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 80 | 10 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 33 | 33 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 0 | 100 | 0 | - |
Criterion 3: Meeting the special needs of the area
Q5. Do you agree that ‘meeting the special needs of the area’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 143 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 87 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| All answering (%) | 158 | 91 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 90 | 7 | 3 | - |
| Organisations | 30 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 80 | 0 | 20 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q6. Do you agree with the components of criterion 3 (meeting the special needs of the area)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: How would National Park designation support the conservation and enhancement of cultural heritage and the historic environment?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 135 | 17 | 3 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 82 | 10 | 2 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 87 | 11 | 2 | - |
| Individuals | 126 | 85 | 13 | 2 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 97 | 3 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: How would National Park designation support nature recovery and restoration in the area, including ecosystem restoration, protection and recovery of vulnerable and important species and wildlife management?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 145 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 94 | 5 | 1 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 94 | 6 | 0 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 0 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 3: How would National Park designation help to promote the understanding and enjoyment of the area by Scotland’s people?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 131 | 15 | 7 | 12 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 79 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 153 | 86 | 10 | 5 | - |
| Individuals | 124 | 85 | 10 | 5 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 90 | 7 | 3 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 86 | 7 | 7 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 4: How would National Park designation support the sustainable development and well-being of local communities?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 141 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 85 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 91 | 7 | 2 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 90 | 7 | 2 | - |
| Organisations | 30 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 75 | 25 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 5: How would National Park designation support the sustainable use of the area’s natural resources and how it would make a significant contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 141 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 85 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 92 | 5 | 4 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 90 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 97 | 0 | 3 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Criterion 4: Visitor management and experience
Q7. Do you agree that ‘visitor management and experience’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 139 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 90 | 6 | 5 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 87 | 7 | 6 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q8. Do you agree with the components of criterion 4 (visitor management and experience)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: How would National Park designation enhance opportunities for enjoyment, recreation and understanding of the area’s natural and cultural heritage?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 138 | 10 | 6 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 84 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 90 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 89 | 6 | 5 | - |
| Organisations | 27 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 13 | 92 | 8 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 33 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: How would National Park designation support visitor management in the area?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 135 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 82 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 88 | 6 | 6 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 86 | 8 | 6 | - |
| Organisations | 27 | 96 | 0 | 4 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 13 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 0 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 3: How could National Park designation support current and potential future transport infrastructure in and around the proposed area?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 132 | 9 | 13 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 80 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 86 | 6 | 8 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 86 | 6 | 8 | - |
| Organisations | 27 | 85 | 4 | 11 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 13 | 85 | 8 | 8 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 0 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 0 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 4: How could National Park designation support access to nature for Scotland’s people?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 135 | 13 | 7 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 82 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 87 | 8 | 5 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 88 | 6 | 6 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 82 | 18 | 0 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 79 | 21 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 10 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 33 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Criterion 5: Added value
Q9. Do you agree that ‘added value’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 112 | 26 | 17 | 10 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 68 | 16 | 10 | 6 |
| All answering (%) | 155 | 72 | 17 | 11 | - |
| Individuals | 127 | 69 | 19 | 12 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 86 | 7 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 71 | 14 | 14 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q10. Do you agree with the components of criterion 5 (added value)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: How would the benefits of a National Park in the area justify the investment required?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 116 | 20 | 17 | 12 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 70 | 12 | 10 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 153 | 76 | 13 | 11 | - |
| Individuals | 126 | 76 | 14 | 10 | - |
| Organisations | 27 | 74 | 7 | 19 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 57 | 14 | 29 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 9 | 89 | 0 | 11 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: What is the added value that National Park designation would bring to the area?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 109 | 25 | 17 | 14 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 66 | 15 | 10 | 8 |
| All answering (%) | 151 | 72 | 17 | 11 | - |
| Individuals | 124 | 71 | 19 | 10 | - |
| Organisations | 27 | 78 | 7 | 15 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 64 | 7 | 29 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 9 | 89 | 11 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Criterion 6: Local support
Q11. Do you agree that ‘local support’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 121 | 22 | 14 | 8 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 73 | 13 | 8 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 157 | 77 | 14 | 9 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 73 | 17 | 9 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 87 | 0 | 13 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q12. Do you agree with the components of criterion 6 (local support)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: What level of local support (with evidence) is there from local interests (community bodies, landowners and managers, businesses, third sector organisations, public bodies etc).
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 115 | 27 | 15 | 8 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 70 | 16 | 9 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 157 | 73 | 17 | 10 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 69 | 21 | 10 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 87 | 0 | 13 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: What level of support (with evidence) is there from the local authority/authorities in the area?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 113 | 23 | 21 | 8 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 68 | 14 | 13 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 157 | 72 | 15 | 13 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 69 | 18 | 13 | - |
| Organisations | 29 | 86 | 0 | 14 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 80 | 0 | 20 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 0 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Criterion 7: Strategic contribution
Q13. Do you agree that ‘strategic contribution’ should be a criterion for assessing nominations for new National Parks? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 142 | 12 | 2 | 9 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 86 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| All answering (%) | 156 | 91 | 8 | 1 | - |
| Individuals | 128 | 91 | 8 | 1 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 89 | 7 | 4 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 15 | 87 | 13 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 90 | 0 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Q14. Do you agree with the components of criterion 7 (strategic importance)? If you disagree, please give reasons for your answer.
Component 1: How could National Park designation support the area’s leadership on climate change mitigation and adaptation in a way that is fair and inclusive for local communities?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 134 | 12 | 8 | 11 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 81 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 154 | 87 | 8 | 5 | - |
| Individuals | 126 | 88 | 8 | 4 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 82 | 7 | 11 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 0 | 7 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 70 | 20 | 10 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 0 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 2: How could National Park designation support the area’s contribution to commitments within the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy, including ecosystem restoration, protection and recovery of vulnerable species, wildlife management, nature friendly farming, the expansion of areas that are protected for nature and the development of nature networks?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 134 | 9 | 9 | 13 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 81 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| All answering (%) | 152 | 88 | 6 | 6 | - |
| Individuals | 124 | 89 | 6 | 5 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 86 | 4 | 11 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 80 | 0 | 20 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 0 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 3: How could designation as a National Park support sustainable investment in the area’s natural capital?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 128 | 15 | 10 | 12 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 78 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 153 | 84 | 10 | 7 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 85 | 10 | 5 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 79 | 7 | 14 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 86 | 7 | 7 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 70 | 10 | 20 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 67 | 0 | 33 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 4: How could designation as a National Park support the development of green skills and jobs in the area?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 136 | 11 | 6 | 12 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 82 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| All answering (%) | 153 | 89 | 7 | 4 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 89 | 8 | 3 | - |
| Organisations | 28 | 89 | 4 | 7 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 10 | 70 | 10 | 20 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Component 5: How could designation as a National Park complement the contribution that Scotland’s existing National Parks make to tackling the nature and biodiversity crises?
| n= | % Agree | % Disagree | % Don’t know | % No answer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents (n=) | 165 | 137 | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| All respondents (%) | 165 | 83 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| All answering (%) | 151 | 91 | 5 | 4 | - |
| Individuals | 125 | 91 | 6 | 3 | - |
| Organisations | 26 | 88 | 4 | 8 | - |
| - Interest organisations / Stakeholders | 14 | 93 | 7 | 0 | - |
| - Public sector bodies | 9 | 89 | 0 | 11 | - |
| - Built Environment / Land management | 2 | 50 | 0 | 50 | - |
| - Energy | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | - |
Contact
Email: nationalparks@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback