Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement: call for evidence analysis report
We held a call for evidence from 26 November 2024 to 18 February 2025 to gather the expert input needed to inform development of the Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement (IFMI) Programme. This document summarises the responses to the call for evidence.
Part 1: You and Your Business
In total, 100 written responses were received to the Call for Evidence. Most responses were submitted to Citizen Space, the Scottish Government’s online platform for public consultation, although some responses were also received via email. These responses were reviewed by the research team and uploaded to Citizen Space.
Of those who responded to the Call for Evidence, 52 individuals and 48 organisations submitted responses. Eight respondents submitted their response as part of a campaign, although respondents were able to edit their response and consequently these responses are analysed as any other individual respondent.
Question 1: What is your role in relation to the commercial inshore fisheries sector in Scotland?
Respondents were given the choice of options outlined within Table 1 when answering this question. Please note that some respondents stated that they held more than one role, hence the total number of respondents in Table 1 being more than the 100 respondents who responded to the Call for Evidence.
| Role | Number of respondents | Percent % |
|---|---|---|
| Science & academia | 7 | 6.25 |
| Inshore commercial fisher | 27 | 24.11 |
| National fishers’ representative | 5 | 4.46 |
| Regional fishers’ representative | 8 | 7.14 |
| Seafood processing / other ancillary seafood sector | 5 | 4.46 |
| Coastal community group | 11 | 9.82 |
| Environmental Non-Governmental Organisation (eNGO) | 13 | 11.61 |
| Public sector | 5 | 4.46 |
| Other (For example, hobby fisher) | 34 | 30.36 |
| Total | 115 | 100 |
Question 2: Of the six Regional Inshore Fisheries Groups, which one are you most closely associated with geographically?
Respondents were given the choice of options outlined within Table 2 when answering this question. Respondents also provided information on which Regional Inshore Fisheries Group they were most closely associated with geographically (table 2). Of those who responded, 26 (over a quarter of respondents) were not associated with a geographic region (e.g. they were a national body). The region with the highest number of respondents was the South West Coast (23), with the lowest number of respondents from Shetland (3) and Orkney (5).
| Region | Number of respondents |
|---|---|
| None (i.e. a national body) | 26 |
| Shetland | 3 |
| Outer Hebrides - from the baseline between the Butt of Lewis and Barra Head, as well as the sea out from St Kilda, the Flannan Isles, North Rona and Sula Sgeir. | 11 |
| North West Coast - Cape Wrath in the north to Ardnamurchan Point, including the Inner Hebrides north of Ardnamurchan. | 16 |
| South West Coast - Ardnamurchan Point to the national border with England in the Solway Firth, including Inner Hebrides south of Ardnamurchan. | 23 |
| North and East Coast - Durness on the north coast and all of the east coast down to Burnmouth close to the border with England. | 16 |
| Orkney - Orkney, extending out to 12 miles around the isles and the waters surrounding Sule Skerry to the west. | 5 |
| Total | 100 |
Contact
Email: inshore@gov.scot