Correspondence and Briefing relating to Transgender Prisoners: FOI release
Information request and response under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002
Information requested
All government correspondence (including emails, whatsapps, text) between officials, civil servants, ministers, special advisers, outside sources that mention Isla Bryson or Adam Graham over the last three months.
Response
Please accept my apologies for delay in responding to your request.
Some of the information you requested has been published in response to FOI reference 202300340450 which has been published on the Scottish Government website and available at: Correspondence and Briefing held by Scottish Government relating to Transgender Prisoners: FOI release - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)
I attach a copy of the remaining information you requested. Whilst our aim is to provide information whenever possible, we are unable to provide some of the information you have requested because elements of the correspondence you requested have been redacted under exemption in terms of section 38(1)(b), section 29(1)(a), section 25(1), section 30(b)(i) and 30(b)(ii) and section 36(1) of FOISA.
An exemption under section 38(1)(b) of FOISA (personal information) applies to a small amount of the information requested because it is personal data of a third party, ie names and contact details of individuals, and disclosing it would contravene the data protection principles in Article 5(1) of theGeneral Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act 2018. This exemption is not subject to the ‘public interest test’, so we are not required to consider if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption.
An exemption under section 29(1)(a) of FOISA (formulation or development of government policy) applies to some of the information requested because it relates to the formulation and development of policy on management of transgender prisoners.
This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. We looked at different stages in the policy development. In this case, a distinct and active phase of the current policy development started in January 2023 as a response to public concern around circumstances of an individual case and then a recognition that this phase will impact the ongoing wider Gender Identity and Reassignment Policy Review by SPS which though is in its final stages but will take into considerations the lessons learnt review undertaken during this period.
Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption. We recognise that there is a public interest in disclosing information as part of open, transparent and accountable government, and to inform public debate. However, there is a greater public interest in high quality policy and decisionmaking, and in the properly considered implementation and development of policies and decisions.
This means that Ministers and officials need to be able to consider all available options and to debate those rigorously, to fully understand their possible implications. Their candour in doing so will be affected by their assessment of whether the discussions on matters relating to this policy review will be disclosed in the near future, when it may undermine or constrain the Government’s view on that policy while it is still under discussion and development. While disclosure could contribute to debate on a matter of public interest, the exemption is upheld due to the sensitive nature of formulation of that policy and its interaction with personal information. As well as the need to ensure that wherever possible individual's rights are protected, and to ensure policy can be developed in a rigorous manner, the policy and information requested relates significantly to an individual case which adds weight to concluding that the exemption should be upheld.
Under section 25(1) of FOISA, we do not have to give you information which is already reasonably accessible to you. If, however, you do not have internet access to obtain this information from the website(s) listed, then please contact me again and I will send you a paper copy.
An exemption under sections 30(b)(i) (Free and frank provision of advice) and 30(b)(ii) (free and frank exchange of views for the purpose of deliberation) of FOISA applies to some the information you have requested. These exemptions apply because disclosure would, or would be likely to, inhibit substantially the free and frank provision of advice. This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’.
Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption. We recognise that there is a public interest in disclosing information as part of open, transparent and accountable government, and to inform public debate. However, there is a greater public interest in allowing a private space within which officials can provide free and frank advice and views before the Scottish Government reaches a settled public view. Disclosing the content of such free and frank exchange of views will substantially inhibit the communication of such matters in the future, which would not be in the public interest. As an individual case is a key starting point around the consideration of advice, the balance of the assessment around this is weighted even more in favour of withholding the information.
An exemption under section 36(1) of FOISA (confidentiality of communications) applies to some of the information requested because it is legal advice and disclosure would breach legal professional privilege.
This exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption. recognise that there is some public interest in release as part of open and transparent government, and to inform the public debate. However, this is outweighed by the strong public interest in maintaining the right to confidentiality of communications between legal advisers and clients, to ensure that Ministers and officials are able to receive legal advice in confidence, like any other public or private organisation.
Some of the information requested under this request relates to Gender Identity and Reassignment Policy 2014 which is currently under review. The interim measures announced on 09 Feb 2023 - Recommendations - Transgender prisoner management: urgent case review correspondence - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) will remain in place pending the outcome of the policy review.
About FOI
The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. View all FOI responses at http://www.gov.scot/foi-responses.
Contact
Please quote the FOI reference
Central Enquiry Unit
Email: ceu@gov.scot
Phone: 0300 244 4000
The Scottish Government
St Andrews House
Regent Road
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback