Jordanhill School Budget Review 2025/26: equality impact assessment

Stage 3: Assessing the impacts and identifying opportunities to promote equality

Do you think that the policy impacts on people on the grounds of their age? Either directly or indirectly?

Age

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation - None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to age.

• Advancing quality of opportunity - None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to age.

• Promoting good relations among and between different age groups - None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on promoting good relations among and between different age groups

Do you think that the policy impacts disabled people? Either directly or indirectly?

Disability

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation – None

Reason for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to disabled people.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reason for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to disabled people.

• Promoting good relations among and between disabled and non-disabled people - None

Reason for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to disabled and non-disabled people.

Do you think that the policy impacts on men and women in different ways? Either directly or indirectly?

Sex

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to sex.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to sex.

• Promoting good relation between men and women – None

Reasons for your decision

There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on promoting good relations between men and women.

Do you think that the policy impacts on women on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity? Either directly or indirectly?

Pregnancy and Maternity

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on promoting good relations in relation to pregnancy and maternity.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on promoting good relations in relation to pregnancy and maternity.

• Promoting good relations - None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on promoting good relations in relation to pregnancy and maternity.

Do you think your policy impacts on people proposing to undergo, undergoing, or who have undergone a process for the purpose of reassigning their sex? Either directly or indirectly? (NB: the Equality Act 2010 uses the term ‘transsexual people’ but ‘trans people’ is more commonly used)

Gender reassignment

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to gender reassignment.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to gender reassignment.

• Promoting good relations - None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to gender reassignment.

Do you think that the policy impacts on people on the grounds of their sexual orientation? Either directly or indirectly?

Sexual orientation

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to sexual orientation.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to sexual orientation.

• Promoting good relations – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to sexual orientation.

Do you think the policy impacts on people on the grounds of their race? Either directly or indirectly?

Race

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to race.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to race.

• Promoting good relations – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to race.

Do you think the policy impacts on people on the grounds of their religion or belief? Either directly or indirectly?

Religion or belief

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to religion or belief.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to religion or belief.

• Promoting good relations – None

Reasons for your decision - There is no evidence to show that the funding review for the School will have either a positive or negative impact on eliminating unlawful discrimination in relation to religion or belief.

Do you think the policy impacts on people on the grounds of their marriage or civil partnership? Either directly or indirectly?

Marriage and Civil Partnership^[2]

• Eliminating unlawful discrimination – None

Reasons for your decision - Not relevant to this policy.

• Advancing equality of opportunity – None

Reasons for your decision - Not relevant to this policy.

• Promoting good relations – None

Reasons for your decision - Not relevant to this policy.