3. Proposals for Scotland
3.1. Timetable for Implementation
3.1.1. We are working towards the implementation programme for the new Vetting and Barring Scheme beginning in Scotland from late 2007 with any interim measures being introduced as soon as it is feasible. This consultation is the beginning of the process of change for those aspects which require primary legislation. Scotland already has robust systems in place for the protection of children and this legislative process is about extending protection to vulnerable adults and improving systems even further.
Consultation on framework legislation
Drafting of Bill
Introduction of Bill
Autumn 2006 -Spring 2007
Parliamentary consideration of Bill
Spring / Summer 2007
Consultation on detailed implementation
Secondary legislation made
Programme implementation begins
3.2. Vision, Aims and Objectives
3.2.1. The Scottish Ministers have set out the high-level vision for children and young people in Scotland, wanting them to have ambition for themselves and to be confident individuals, effective contributors, successful learners and responsible citizens. Ministers want to see all Scotland's children and young people being nurtured, safe, active, healthy, engaged in learning, achieving, included, respected and responsible. This legislation is about keeping Scotland's children safe from those who pose a danger to them whilst reducing the bureaucracy for those who provide services to children. We believe that strong child protection systems do not need to be at the expense of children's engagement in learning, sport and leisure activities, for example, which are so important in their development.
3.2.2. It is equally important that Scotland's adult population be afforded appropriate care and protection. The Scottish Ministers are committed to protecting and improving the health and quality of life of people in Scotland, and to promote better health and community care services, ensuring there is treatment, care, support and protection for those in greatest need. These legislative proposals are an important step to enhancing care and protection for vulnerable adults; other measures are scheduled for introduction to the Scottish Parliament as part of vulnerable adults legislation later this year.
3.2.3. Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child upholds children's right to be protected from 'all forms of physical or mental violence'. This scheme is designed to uphold that right by improving their protection from unsuitable people seeking access to them through their work.
3.2.4. On 2 February 2005, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution AP(2005)1 on safeguarding adults and children with disabilities against abuse. The new scheme would also support implementation of this Resolution.
3.2.5. In line with the vision, the two aims of the new vetting and barring scheme are that:
- those who are known to be unsuitable do not gain access to children or vulnerable adults through their work; and
- those who become unsuitable are detected at the earliest possible stage, and are prevented from continuing to work, or seeking to work, with children or vulnerable adults.
3.2.6. These aims must be met whilst respecting the human rights of individuals in the vulnerable groups' workforce. These include the need to deal with individuals fairly and justly and the right of individuals to earn a living. Scottish legislation is required by the Scotland Act 1998 (establishing the Scottish Parliament) to be compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights.
3.2.7. In support of these aims, we have the following objectives:
- reduce the bureaucracy around the disclosure process;
- reduce the burden on employers by including an assessment on unsuitability to work with vulnerable groups as part of the disclosure process and so improve consistency of decision making;
- deliver a vetting service which will support effective recruitment practices; and
- ensure consistency, compatibility and connectivity across the UK, even though we may adopt different approaches to some of the detail.
3.2.8. We will seek to deliver these objectives through the most efficient and effective means.
Costs, benefits and proportionality
3.2.9. Before turning to the specifics of the proposed scheme, it is important to recognise that there will be implications in delivering expected benefits which may impact in a number of interrelated ways:
- opportunity cost: expenditure on these proposals, whether incurred by the Executive or other bodies, will be met from money which could have, for example, been spent on frontline service delivery or other measures which have an impact on the safety and quality of life of vulnerable groups;
- speed versus scope of checks: the more extensive the checking regime is, the longer than the process will take. For example, if a large number of lists of offenders or professional registers needs to be checked, this will take time and effort;
- cost to the providers of information and user: the more extensive the checking regime is, the more expensive this is likely to be. This could result in a higher fee; and
- loss of capacity: the more precautionary and less flexible the scheme is, the more individuals will be precluded from the vulnerable groups' workforce and, with them, will be some who would not actually harm anyone.
3.2.10. These points illustrate the importance of balancing the wish to develop as robust a system as we can with the need for proportionality. The goal must be to devise a scheme which leads to an overall improvement in protection of vulnerable groups with costs which are identified and acceptable.
3.2.11. Respondents are asked to bear this in mind when considering their response to this paper. In particular, we would welcome an indication of what respondents think are the top priorities and those measures whose benefits which, although worthy in themselves, might have too great an adverse impact.
3.3.1. We are proposing a scheme that builds on the existing DWCL and the infrastructure provided by Disclosure Scotland and its network of registered bodies. The new system will be comprehensive, integrated in approach and have an element of centralised decision-making on unsuitability.
3.3.2. Building on Sir Michael's recommendations, the Scottish Bichard Vetting and Barring Scheme will operate as follows. For the purposes of this paper, applicant means the person making the application for disclosure (the subject of the disclosure) and employer means the person or body accessing the information. We use position to mean the job, role or setting for which disclosure is required and it includes working in the voluntary sector or volunteering. Vulnerable groups means children and vulnerable adults.
3.3.3. Not everything will change; there is a lot that works in the current system. Unless the person is barred, suitability for employment will remain for the employer. Referrals by employers, regulatory bodies and the courts will continue to be made to the DWCL and will be extended to include the new Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List. Pro-active consideration of offences and other police intelligence by a central body is the main new component of the system.
3.3.4. Application and first contact
Range of applicants
We will extend the scope of vetting to enable parents and personal employers to ask nannies, music teachers, carers for vulnerable adults etc to apply for enhanced disclosure. Applications will be mediated through a registered body just as employers countersign applications now.
Range of positions
The range of potential positions will be expanded to cover indirect contact with vulnerable groups (phone and internet) that provide opportunities for grooming and about those with substantial access to personal and sensitive information relating to children and vulnerable adults.
Making an application
Applicants will find the process of applying for an enhanced disclosure clearer and more straightforward. Anyone wanting to work with vulnerable groups will apply for a new Vetting and Barring Disclosure.
3.3.5. Barred lists
Checking the applicant against lists of barred persons
A new Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List ( DWVAL) will be created. The scope of the DWCL will be extended. The applicant will be checked against a comprehensive list of people barred from working with children or the separate list of people barred from working with vulnerable adults.
Checking for convictions
Information on the applicant's previous convictions, spent and unspent will be gathered.
Checking police intelligence on the applicant
Information sharing will be further improved between the police, Disclosure Scotland and decision-makers.
Determining whether the applicant should be entered onto the lists of barred persons.
A new Central Barring Unit will determine whether the applicant should be placed on one or both lists of barred persons depending on the conviction information and police intelligence available to Disclosure Scotland and any previous referrals (see below).
Sometimes, usually only in the case of a referral from an organisation, it may take time to determine whether the individual should be listed. In such circumstances, the individual will be provisionally listed. This means the individual will be able to continue to work pending the final determination, employers will be notified, and the fact of the provisional listing will appear on a disclosure check, or check of current barred status. The individual will receive relevant information and be able to engage in the determination process.
Appeal against barring
In any case where an individual is barred as a result of a determination by the Central Barring Unit, the individual may appeal against the barring decision to the sheriff court.
Final decision on employment
Unless the applicant is barred, the final decision to employ the subject will rest with employer on the basis of their robust recruitment and selection procedures. The exception will remain when individuals are listed as barred - employing someone in the relevant workforce who is on the DWCL (or the new DWVAL) will be an offence.
3.3.6. Information sharing
The ability of the scheme to provide accurate, relevant and timely information will require legislative provision to allow and improve information flow between relevant bodies. It is also dependent on ongoing improvements to the disclosure and police systems and we will continue to work with other parts of the UK to ensure systems and process are coherent and compatible.
Referrals by employers and other agencies
As with the current DWCL, where an employer, or other agency, is concerned that an individual poses a risk to vulnerable groups and they have taken action as a result of that, they will have a duty to make a referral to the Central Barring Unit. It will consider whether the individual needs to be added to either or both lists through a determination procedure as above, and any relevant current employer(s) / regulatory bodies informed.
3.4. Proposals and Issues Arising
Application and first contact
Proposal 1: individuals requiring Vetting and Barring Disclosure
Any individual new to the children and vulnerable adult workforce or changing positions (whether paid or unpaid) will need to apply for a Vetting and Barring Disclosure from Disclosure Scotland. (A Vetting and Barring Disclosure is a new type of Disclosure for the children and vulnerable adult workforce.)
3.4.1. If an individual is new to the workforce or changing positions (whether paid or unpaid) they will need to apply for a Vetting and Barring Disclosure from Disclosure Scotland. This is the entry route into the new vetting and barring scheme. On subsequent changes of position, organisations will be able to check the barred status of the individual rather than seek a full disclosure. There will be security measures to prevent unauthorised access of barred status.
3.4.2. We are not proposing to make a Vetting and Barring Disclosure mandatory for a list of specified positions or settings. Rather we intend to build on the wide ranging definition of child care position in the framework of the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003 (Schedule 2) amending this as necessary to improve clarity for organisations when considering if their posts could be considered 'child care'. A similar framework will be established for vulnerable adults.
Proposal 2: range of applicants
Parents and personal employers, as well as organisations, will be able to ask individuals to apply for a Vetting and Barring Disclosure or check the barred status of somebody already in the system.
3.4.3. Under the disclosure system, applications for standard and enhanced disclosures must be countersigned by a registered person. There are two reasons for countersignature by a registered person, firstly to verify the identity of the applicant and, secondly, to confirm that the post applied for is one that is exempt from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 ( ROA), which is the mechanism allowing the disclosure of spent convictions. At present, parents and personal employers are unable to request that an individual apply for a standard or enhanced disclosure because there is no mechanism to allow them to confirm that the post is exempt from the ROA. To implement this proposal, we will need to put in place arrangements for a registered body to confirm identity and allow access to spent convictions for applicants wishing to work for parents and personal employers.
Proposal 3: range of positions
The range of positions for which a Vetting and Barring Disclosure can be obtained will be expanded beyond those for which disclosure can currently be obtained. It will include occupations with indirect contact with children and vulnerable adults.
3.4.4. As well as covering those who work primarily and directly with vulnerable groups, the new Vetting and Barring Disclosure will be available to those people:
- whose work offers them the opportunity for regular contact with vulnerable groups (for example, telephone helpline operators and internet chat-room moderators);
- whose work places them in a position of trust in relation to vulnerable groups (for example, police officers); and
- who have substantial access to personal and sensitive information about vulnerable groups (for example, database operators).
Proposal 4: costs of Vetting and Barring Disclosure
The Scottish Ministers will have a power to set charges for Vetting and Barring Disclosure (as they do now for all Disclosures) and any other new processes. Detailed costs have still to be established but there will be additional costs in conducting a Vetting and Barring Disclosure which are likely to be met through the application fee. The current intention is that subsequent checks of barred status will be free, or at a lower cost. A fee would be charged for a subsequent full disclosure.
3.4.5. Under the new system, there are likely to be different fees for the initial disclosure procedure and subsequent checks. As now, it will continue to be the responsibility of the applicant to pay for disclosure, although many employers choose to cover the cost. The revenue raised through the collection of fees will need to cover the costs of the new system. One way to do this is for the initial check to be more expensive and subsequent checks of barred status to be cheaper or free of charge.
3.4.6. It is too early to calculate what any new fee might be since it will depend on the additional costs of the new system compared to the current system and the number of applications for Disclosure and subsequent checks. These, in turn, depend on the coverage of the new system and the lifetime of certificates, amongst other things being consulted on here and as we develop the detail of the system.
Proposal 5: free Vetting and Barring Disclosure for volunteers
It is planned that volunteers working in voluntary organisations with children or vulnerable adults will receive the Vetting and Barring Disclosure at no cost to themselves.
3.4.7. This proposal reflects the current position. We believe it is important that it should remain the case so as not to be a barrier to people who wish to volunteer.
Proposal 6: Vetting and Barring Disclosure of existing workforce (retrospective checking)
Retrospective Vetting and Barring Disclosures will not be an immediate requirement when the new scheme first becomes operational. The Scottish Ministers will have a power to set a time by which the entire relevant workforce should have been through the new procedures. This may be phased by occupation/sector. Such a time is likely to be in the range of within 3-5 years of operation of the new scheme.
3.4.8. Disclosure Scotland currently processes around 500,000 applications a year. To provide a check for all existing staff when the new scheme first becomes operational would present a significant burden and would deflect Disclosure Scotland from checking people new to the workforce. Organisations should have in place robust recruitment practices, of which disclosure checking is only one element, and sound child protection practices and procedures. The first priority for the new scheme when it goes live will be to operate efficiently in respect of new entrants to the vulnerable groups workforce or those moving between positions.
3.4.9. From day one, any employer will have the opportunity to request that existing employees apply for the new Vetting and Barring Disclosure, but there will be no obligation to do so. Once the scheme is established, time limits will be set by which the entire workforce should have been through the new procedures. To prevent the system being overloaded and to prioritise effectively, the most sensitive positions may have earlier time limits set than others. This information will be provided in sufficient time to allow organisations to plan how they will manage this process.
3.4.10. The Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003 makes provision for a Disqualified from Working with Children List ( DWCL).
Proposal 7: Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List ( DWVAL)
There shall be a list of persons barred from working with vulnerable adults.
3.4.11. We are proposing that there will be a Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List ( DWVAL) which will operate in a similar way to the Disqualified from Working with Children List.
Proposal 8: definition of vulnerable adult
The intention is to improve protection for those vulnerable adults aged 16 or over who are in receipt of care services and/or support from employees (including paid and unpaid volunteers) in regulated and NHS care settings. Therefore, the definition of "vulnerable adult" will primarily be a service-orientated definition.
3.4.12. A consultation paper, Protecting Vulnerable Adults - Securing Their Safety, was published in February 2004. Analysis of the consultation responses was published in August 2004 and views expressed in the consultation will be taken into account in developing this legislation. Since that consultation, the definitions of a vulnerable adult, and vulnerable adult care position, have been expanded. We are not looking for views on these definitions in this consultation exercise unless the context raises new issues.
3.4.13. More information on previous consultations and current proposals in respect of the protection of vulnerable adults is available on the Scottish Executive's website:
Proposal 9: changes to the Disqualified from Working with Children List
Schedule 2 of the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003 will be amended to clarify and extend the definition of child care positions. (Other amendments will be required to this Act in relation to other proposals in this paper.)
3.4.14. The 2003 Act provides for a Disqualified from Working with Children List ( DWCL) to be established and maintained by the Scottish Ministers and for those on the list to be barred from working with children. An individual who knows that he or she is listed commits an offence if he or she applies for, offers to do, accepts or does any work in a child care position (within the meaning of schedule 2) whilst listed, other than provisionally.
3.4.15. The 2003 Act places a duty on organisations to make a referral for possible inclusion in the DWCL where:
- an individual is in a child care position;
- that individual harms or places a child at risk of harm; and
- the organisation has dismissed the individual or moved them away from working with children or the individual has left before that action could be taken.
3.4.16. Individuals convicted of an offence against a child (within the meaning of section 10(9)(b)) may also be placed on the DWCL at the discretion of the courts.
3.4.17. An organisation commits an offence if it offers work in a child care position to an individual whom it knows is listed. The information that an individual is on the DWCL is released as part of a disclosure check.
3.4.18. As well as amending schedule 2 to extend the definition of childcare positions, we are proposing the following amendments to the 2003 Act (which relate to other proposals in this paper):
- extension of the list of regulatory bodies which can make referrals (section 4);
- inclusion of new offences created in the Protection of Children and Prevention of Sexual Harm Bill (schedule 1);
- possible changes to determination procedures (Determination Regulations 2004);
- granting the police powers to access the DWCL directly; and
- changes required to enable retrospective checking.
Some of these changes can be taken forward through secondary legislation.
3.4.19. More information on the operation of the Disqualified from Working with Children List can be found on the Scottish Executive's website: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/childprotection
Proposal 10: decisions on barred lists to be taken by a new Central Barring Unit
There shall be a new Central Barring Unit which will make decisions about which individuals should be placed on either list. Disclosure Scotland will continue to gather information and this will be passed to the Central Barring Unit for decision.
3.4.20. As now, the application to Disclosure Scotland would be the starting point for entry into the system. In those cases where information is revealed by a search, all relevant information will be passed on to a central expert team, the Central Barring Unit, to consider whether an individual should be barred from working with children or vulnerable adults. Based on the relevance and seriousness of the information received, a decision will be made as to whether that person is unsuitable to work with children and/or vulnerable adults. System improvements should speed up the process but this proactive barring assessment may delay the issuing of the Disclosure in the very small number of cases where an assessment needs to be made.
3.4.21. We need to determine whether the decision to bar should be made by a special panel, a "case conference" or by an administrator. The procedure is likely to be set out in secondary legislation but the primary legislation needs to contain the right enabling provision.
Proposal 11: status and governance of the Central Barring Unit
The status and governance arrangements for the new Central Barring Unit are to be determined, as is its precise relationship with Disclosure Scotland. The status and governance arrangements for Disclosure Scotland itself may also need to be adjusted.
3.4.22. Whatever model of governance is adopted for the Central Barring Unit, the Scottish Ministers are ultimately accountable for its decisions. But the model of governance does affect who is immediately responsible for making decisions on listing. We have identified three possible options for structure:
- a Non-Departmental Public Body ( NDPB, for which we would need to make legislative provision) with responsibility resting with a panel of experts or administrators;
- an Executive Agency linked to Ministers but one step removed - under this responsibility would ultimately rest with Ministers; or
- a core civil service function, as with the current DCWL arrangements, so that the Central Barring Unit is part of the Education Department or Health Department and Ministers are more directly responsible. (Even within this option, there is scope to alter the composition and operation of the Determination Panel, perhaps to include external representation.)
3.4.23. Alternatively, the Central Barring Unit could be part of Disclosure Scotland which, under current governance arrangements, would again mean that the Scottish Ministers were responsible for listing decisions. Currently, Disclosure Scotland operates the disclosure system on behalf of the Scottish Ministers. Staff of Strathclyde Joint Police Board, based in the Scottish Criminal Record Office (currently a common police service) and BT plc work in partnership to deliver the service. The Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill, currently before the Scottish Parliament, will establish the Scottish Police Services Authority ( SPSA), a new NDPB. Disclosure Scotland is currently expected to become part of SPSA.
3.4.24. In identifying the best structure, the following factors need to be taken into account:
- effective information sharing -- remembering the drivers for these changes, we need governance arrangements which make it easy for the Central Barring Unit to access the information it needs;
- accountability -- whatever individual or panel actually makes the barring decisions, somebody, if not the Scottish Ministers, needs to be publicly accountable;
- cost effectiveness -- there is a presumption against setting up new NDPBs if the work can be taken forward appropriately by existing bodies.
Proposal 12: responsibility for maintaining barred lists
As well as making decisions, the Central Barring Unit shall maintain the Disqualified from Working with Children List and the Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List on behalf of the Scottish Ministers.
3.4.25. The Central Barring Unit will maintain a list of those barred from working with children, based on the current DWCL, and a separate Disqualified from Working with Vulnerable Adults List, which will be introduced through this legislation. It will be possible for some individuals to be barred under both sets of criteria and named on both lists. Volunteering will be covered as well as paid work.
Proposal 13: continuous updating of barred lists
Any new information on an individual who has previously been the subject of a Vetting and Barring Disclosure will be passed to the Central Barring Unit to enable the barred status of the individual to be reviewed.
3.4.26. Even where the initial search reveals no information, the fact that a Vetting and Barring Disclosure has been carried out for work with vulnerable groups will be recorded by the Disclosure Scotland system with a link to the criminal history system. This will effectively be the equivalent of registration, since the record will be flagged so that Disclosure Scotland will be automatically alerted to any new information that subsequently becomes available relating to a flagged individual. They will pass that information to the Central Barring Unit. This continuous updating will allow the barring decision to be kept under review. The actual system for doing this is still to be determined and will be informed by the range and type of checks that will be required.
3.4.27. Where a decision is made to bar an individual on the basis of new information, for example from the police or from a referral, the applicant and any relevant organisations will be notified. The precise mechanism for doing this is currently being explored.
Proposal 14: provisional listing
Where it will take time to determine whether an individual should or should not be added to one or other list, the individual shall be provisionally listed and entitled to continue to work whilst the determination is made. This will particularly apply when the determination is based on a referral from an organisation.
3.4.28. Provisional listing means that the individual can continue to work whilst the determination is made. (This is different to provisional barring which would mean that the individual could not continue to work pending determination.) Organisations will be notified of provisional listing so as to allow consideration of any action to mitigate risk.
Proposal 15: appeals against listing
Appeals against listing in respect of either the DWCL or DWVAL, in any case other than a court disposal, shall be made to the sheriff court. Legislation shall provide for the appeals to be heard and determined in private. The subject shall have three months to appeal.
3.4.29. Consideration for listing can arise as a result of: information coming to light as part of disclosure; referral by an organisation; or referral as part of a court disposal. In relation to the first two cases, as much information as possible received by the Central Barring Unit must be shared with the applicant so that the individual has an effective appeal right. This is because the applicant needs to understand the basis on which the barring decision was made. However, in an extremely small number of cases, there may be some information which cannot be shared with the applicant. (See paragraph 3.4.37.) Any appeal is made to the sheriff court.
3.4.30. Where listing occurs as part of a court disposal, the defendant can appeal against being listed in the same manner as any appeal against conviction. Independently of how an individual ends up on either list and whether any appeal was made at first listing, they will be able to apply to the sheriff court for removal from the list after a period of time, usually 10 years.
Proposal 16: access to barred status
All "employers" with a legitimate interest shall have access to the applicant's barred status.
3.4.31. Access to the applicant's barred status will be available to all employers with a legitimate interest - this will include personal employers such as parents and those employing carers for vulnerable adults. Access will possibly be made available through the Internet with suitable security systems in place to limit access to the applicant's current or potential employers. In the case of small-scale and personal employers and parents, access may need to be mediated via a registered body. The principal function of the registered body would be identity checking. Whatever the access system decided upon the intention is to make it as quick and simple as possible for that to happen for those who have an authentic, legitimate interest in this information while ensuring an individual's privacy and rights are protected.
3.4.32. Effective information sharing will be crucial for the new scheme to work. Effective information sharing means:
- getting the relevant information to the decision-maker;
- avoiding overwhelming decision-makers with irrelevant information;
- restricting sensitive information to only those who need to know; and
- making sure that information is high-quality and accurate.
3.4.33. It is important to remember that the fundamental decision for which the whole system is being developed is whether an individual is unsuitable to be offered, or continue in, a position with access to vulnerable groups.
3.4.34. There are three main players in making this decision:
- the Central Barring Unit which decides whether the applicant should be barred from working with children or vulnerable adults;
- the regulatory body which decides whether the applicant continues to be professionally registered;
- the employer who decides whether to offer the applicant the position.
3.4.35. For these players as well as the other stakeholders (including the applicant himself, Disclosure Scotland, the police, the Scottish Criminal Record Office, the court service etc), we need to make sure the legislation recognises:
- the information which they hold and are allowed to hold (e.g. police databases);
- the additional information which they receive and from whom it comes (e.g. registration status from a regulatory body);
- the decision which they need to make (e.g. whether to make a referral); and
- the information which they can/must provide and to whom it shall be provided (e.g. barred status).
3.4.36. The flow of information between all those involved in vetting and recruitment currently, and in the future, is very complicated. It is important that we are clear that the purpose of sharing information is to determine unsuitability of those who would work with vulnerable groups. The following proposals highlight proposed changes and are not a comprehensive summary of the current or future position.
Proposal 17: information released to applicant by Central Barring Unit
Where a Vetting and Barring Disclosure has revealed information about the applicant, but there is not sufficient cause for that person to be added to one or other barred list, the information will normally be released as part of the disclosure. This gives the employer and professional body some discretion as to whether to offer the applicant the intended post.
3.4.37. Where a Vetting and Barring Disclosure does not result in the applicant being barred, but there is conviction and/or non-conviction information, this information will normally be made available to the applicant and employer, as is the case currently. In a very small number of cases, there may be information that the police consider should not be passed on to the applicant, usually because it would compromise an ongoing police operation or would put the source of the information at immediate risk of harm. The current legislation (section 115(8) of the Police Act 1997) makes provision for this information to be passed to the employer only or to be withheld. Whilst recognising that the individual has a right to know the basis on which decisions are made about him, we also need to make provision for the Central Barring Unit to withhold that information in those exceptional circumstances.
Proposal 18: duty on public authorities to share information
Legislation shall place a duty on the police and other agencies to share relevant information with the Central Barring Unit (effectively the Scottish Ministers). The Scottish Ministers shall have a power to specify what constitutes relevant information in regulations.
3.4.38. Information includes intelligence and other facts about the individual. Intelligence ranges from allegations, at the soft end, to criminal investigation, at the hard end. There is also semi-public information such as convictions. (Convictions are a matter of public knowledge at the time but no publicly searchable database exists for obvious reasons.) A balance needs to be struck between exchanging useful relevant information and the rights of the individual under ECHR. For operational reasons, the police need to be able to exercise some discretion in the information which they share with others (e.g. protection of sources).
3.4.39. Bichard also proposed that other public bodies, e.g. social services, who might hold information which could be relevant to the unsuitability of an individual to work with vulnerable groups should be under a duty to share it. It is our intention to place such a duty on local authorities, the details of which will be covered in regulations or elsewhere, following further consultation.
Proposal 19: changes to arrangements for notifying employers of convictions
Continuous updating of the barred lists will complement the current arrangements whereby the Scottish Criminal Records Office ( SCRO) provide details of subsequent convictions to employers and regulatory bodies for a range of occupations. The notifiable occupation scheme will need to remain for those occupations to which it currently applies and which will not be included within the vetting and barring scheme. It also has a continuing role in ensuring that employers are made aware of all convictions even where these might not be relevant to the protection of vulnerable groups.
3.4.40. Under circular 4/89 there is a range of professions where SCRO provide the employer and regulatory body (if appropriate) with details of any convictions. A number of the professions included in this scheme, including, for example, teachers and nurses, will fall within the vetting and barring scheme. The system for notifying offences will need to remain in place: for professions not within the vetting and barring scheme; to ensure that employers within the scheme continue to be notified of all convictions; and on a transitional basis until all staff have been through the new Vetting and Barring Disclosure.
Proposal 20: police powers to require details of occupation
We plan to give the police a power to require an individual to give them details of their occupation in cases where the actions of the individual would be of concern if they worked in the vulnerable groups' workforce. This would be defined in such a way as to cover voluntary work as well as paid employment. This will enable the police to take appropriate action in terms of notifying third parties if the individual is a member of that workforce. Failure to give the required information, or giving false information, would be an offence.
3.4.41. At the moment there is no requirement on an individual who has been arrested to provide the police with details of their occupation. Although the police can request this information, there is no obligation on an individual to provide it. This can prevent the notification of convictions to an employer where it would be appropriate. This proposal will also help to ensure that the Central Barring Unit is informed of subsequent information so that an individual's barred status can be reviewed.
Proposal 21: role of the regulatory/professional bodies in disclosure process
Regulatory bodies should be notified of a change in the barred status of an individual. Regulatory bodies should be under a duty to consider making a referral to the Central Barring Unit if they have concerns about any individual. The Central Barring Unit should be able to access professional registers.
3.4.42. Some positions in the vulnerable groups' workforce are governed by a regulatory body (e.g. teachers are regulated by the General Teaching Council for Scotland). When an individual goes through the Vetting and Barring Disclosure in respect of a regulated position, there is the possibility of sharing information with the regulatory body. We need to determine which regulatory bodies should receive information and what information that should be. We believe that it is appropriate for the regulatory body to be notified of the barred status since it may mean that the individual should not take up any position governed by that body. It is also important that regulatory bodies are provided with information, and only information, which has a bearing on the registered status of the individual.
3.4.43. Normally, referrals will be made by the employer because of an incident, or series of incidents, which takes place at work. However, it is important that regulatory bodies can and do make referrals to cover the following potential loopholes: where the employer fails to make a referral; where a complaint is made to the regulatory body directly; and where the regulatory body potentially has more information than anyone else because the individual has more than one employer. We need to consider how to make sure that regulatory bodies correctly identify when to exercise this power and do so effectively.
3.4.44. The Central Barring Unit should know whether an individual has been struck off any regulatory body's professional register. Obviously, being struck off should prevent the individual taking up a registered position. However, depending on the reasons for being struck off, it may be relevant to other positions. For example, an individual going through Vetting and Barring Disclosure for the purposes of becoming a Scout leader may have been struck off the General Teaching Council for Scotland's register of teachers many years before and this fact, and the reasons behind it, should be available to the Central Barring Unit.
Proposal 22: disclosure of civil orders
There shall be a requirement to include civil orders specified in regulations as part of a new Vetting and Barring systems disclosure check, for example Risk of Sexual Harm Orders should be disclosed. Some civil orders may not be relevant and there will be a discretion to disclose them.
3.4.45. We propose to specify in regulations the civil orders which should be disclosed. We do not believe it is appropriate to specify that all civil orders should be disclosed as some of them will have no relevance to protection of vulnerable groups.
Proposal 23: cross-referencing with offender registers and other lists
As part of the new vetting and barring procedure, if an individual is on the Sex Offenders Register or other list (e.g. the English and Welsh Protection of Children Act List), Disclosure Scotland will be required to pass that information to the Central Barring Unit. The Unit can then consider that information as part of their assessment of the individual.
3.4.46. The presence of an individual on the Sex Offenders Register or other list will not automatically lead to that individual being barred. (Of course, certain court disposals will include barring without further consideration.) We believe that to do so would inevitably lead to people being unfairly excluded from the vulnerable groups' workforce. However, the presence of an individual on the Sex Offenders Register or other list clearly needs to be identified and any potential risk assessed. At the moment, the fact that an individual is included on the Sex Offenders Register is normally included on a Disclosure certificate. We are proposing to make this a requirement so that it happens in every case. We will also monitor developments in England and Wales closely to make sure the approach both sides of the border is consistent.
Proposal 24: referrals of new incidents
As now, employers, regulatory bodies and courts will be able to make referrals to the Central Barring Unit in respect of those posing a risk to children. The legislation will extend this regime to those posing a risk of vulnerable adults.
3.4.47. Referrals will be received, as now, from employers when an individual's employment is terminated as a result of reasons associated with harm, or risk of harm, to children or been moved away from working with children or left the organisation before that could happen. Regulatory bodies will be able to highlight concerns about an individual and courts will be able to put individuals on either or both lists as part of the disposal. The proposed legislation will introduce a broadly similar arrangement for those working with vulnerable adults.
Proposal 25: retrospective referrals of incidents
Any employer may make a referral about an incident which occurred before commencement of the new scheme to the Central Barring Unit at any time, subject to the appropriate tests being met. There will be no obligation to do so.
3.4.48. We believe that retrospective referrals should be optional not mandatory, not least because there is no meaningful way of imposing a sanction on those who do not make a referral. However, responsible employers will wish to consider carefully whether there are any individuals whom they employ, or have employed, who should be referred in respect of an incident which occurred before the new scheme is in effect. In the case of someone working in a childcare position, the organisation is already under a duty to refer, should the appropriate tests be met.
Lifetime of certificates and checks
Proposal 26: lifetime of Vetting and Barring Disclosure certificate
The Vetting and Barring Disclosure certificate will be valid for a period of 10 years. The Scottish Ministers will be able to vary this time period, if necessary.
3.4.49. Many employers and regulatory bodies may require their employees to go through full disclosure on a regular basis but, to capture cases where this is not so, we are proposing that full disclosure should be undertaken at least every 10 years. This will be achieved through having the certificate expire 10 years after issue. This measure is in addition to the continuous updating of barred lists (proposal 13) and access to those lists (proposal 16) at any point during the life of the certificate and beyond.
3.5. Working with Other Jurisdictions
3.5.1. As is currently the case, vetting and barring in Scotland will be conducted separately to vetting and barring in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. If the new system works as intended, it should not matter in which jurisdiction in the United Kingdom a disclosure check is carried out and anyone barred in one part of the UK will be barred throughout. However, we need to make sure that UK-wide employers do not divert checks from one system to another for whatever reason (speed or cost) because this could overwhelm smaller systems. We also need to make sure that employers in each jurisdiction can utilise appropriate checks carried out, and certificates produced, by other jurisdictions.